ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Welfare Reform

1543 Words7 Pages

For eliminating those who scam government programs, such as welfare and the food stamp program, and so the taxpayer does not have to pay for other’s needs. It is such a burden on today’s society for all of those who have devoted their lives and labor to making a comfortable income, to fend for those who have failed to escape the suffocating grip of the lower-class lifestyle. It has been deemed the industrious taxpayer’s responsibility to make up for the shortcomings of others in today’s society. It is most frustrating to see a chunk of a well-earned paycheck be given to those who avoid working an honest job; given to those who instead scam government programs such as welfare, and food stamps, to make a living. These programs, designed as a …show more content…

Without welfare and food stamps, there is no other way to crawl out of poverty other than the way of the industrious hard-worker. This will create better citizens out of formerly corrupt individuals. There are plenty of opportunities for the unemployed out there; this idea is just what they need to kick start their drive to succeed.
Fourthly, a side effect of disposing of the SNAP and welfare program will be an increase in the middle class and a decrease in the lower/poor class. The lower class will either be forced to become part of the middle class, or they will die. A result of this will be a sharp decrease of poor, homeless people, and a great influx of the population of the middle class. A large middle class is the trademark of all developed, prosperous nations, as the gap between the upper and lower class closes. This is just one of the many ways that abandoning the poor will lead to the success of our …show more content…

Some believe that understanding, and compassion for those who are in need will mitigate the social stigma that surrounds poverty, giving the confidence boost the impoverished need to seek out a job, or even a higher level of education (Williams, p. 11-12). Some may even suggest that increasing a welfare and food stamp tax on the 1% will allow some relief for the lower-middle class, who need every dime they earn to live comfortably, while still providing people in poverty with the benefits from SNAP and welfare that they need. And as for the issue concerning those who take advantage of these government programs, some have recommended that an increase in regulations and guidelines that target the scammers will be just as effective as eliminating these programs altogether. However, I must respectfully disagree. My idea not only has the potential to eradicate the lower class completely (something that none of these ideas have to offer), it is also extremely simple and practical. No new, convoluted regulations will have to be drawn out to prevent the success of scammers, and no monumental societal changes will have to be made by the American population in an effort to “accept

Show More
Related
236 Words | 1 Pages

The 1996 Welfare Reform Act abolished Federal Cash Assistance and Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) programs, all of which many believed locked people in the perpetual cycle of state- assisted poverty. There were three research findings on the “efficacy of the 1996 reform, all gave a summary of the most influential studies conducted by US researchers. Nearly all reached the same conclusions: First, Welfare Reform under the Clinton administration did result in a significant shift into new employment by the long-term welfare recipients. Secondly, the overall strong growth conditions were linked to the U.S. during the late 1900s. Third, the growth in income and employment experienced by the American poor welfare to work transition

Read More
295 Words | 2 Pages

James Madison's assertion, "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition," was a crucial development in the making of the American government. This quote shows that Madison knew that Americans had a strong ambition, which meant that these Americans' citizenship would be powerful. These men lived in America when the U.S. Constitution had an instructable will to be involved with the government based on their freedom from Great Britain, so these men would have a large percentage in popular participation and would take advantage of their citizenship. Therefore in this idea, Madison knew that with these men being ambitious, the government also had to be ambitious. After this idea, he knew that not just one person could run the government but

Read More
907 Words | 4 Pages

Research-Based Toulmin Argument Paper The term “welfare” is one that is used too loosely and without the proper knowledge in our society. “Eligibility for participation in government benefit programs can be based either on financial need or the occurrence of an event, such as reaching retirement age” (Kessler, 2015, p.1). This research-based toulmin argument paper considers if our government is truly taking steps in the right direction to assist citizens in need in a way that will benefit them for the long haul by exploring the following questions.

Read More
1102 Words | 5 Pages

That is not what welfare should be used for though, it should be used as an extra last resort support system for an individual until they can get back on their feet. This is why there are so many people on the street and in homeless shelters, because the government is giving them free money. This is why it should in the end be up to private organizations and charity. This is because if it is a small group of people working with the less fortunate they can get to know them individually and try to help them off of welfare or the support that they are getting. Granted there are some things that the less fortunate should have the opportunity to have and that is health care.

Read More
1041 Words | 5 Pages

The Welfare Reform is a program that was set up to aid and provide public assistance (Opposing Viewpoints). This type of assistance aids families who are in need of funds due to no income or very little income. Over the next years, the Welfare Reform Act has been slightly changed. Some changes have been an improvement to the program, while other changes did not make an impact on the individuals who receive this form of assistance. Critics of the welfare program have insisted the programs hinders people who receive this form of support.

Read More
333 Words | 2 Pages

If there were no welfare state then we could have freeflow of people across the border. You could work, leave, follow the work. There wouldn 't be a net loss in terms of the tax dollar. You would not be paying taxes then taking benefits.

Read More
877 Words | 4 Pages

Chad Johnson Suna Ridouane ENGL 1302 12 September 2014 Have Food Stamps Contributed to an Overly Dependent Underclass? Imagine it is 3am and you awake from a dream that has your mouth watering for some chocolate chip cookies and vanilla ice cream. You head to the kitchen and open the refrigerator and behold, every food product you ever wanted to purchase was there. The design of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as the Food Stamp Program) is to provide government assistance to purchase food for low and no income people.

Read More
1288 Words | 6 Pages

Today many women work, so welfare reformers adopt this value into welfare programs. Requiring welfare recipients to work for benefits gives people hope and opportunity, and gives them a chance to work. Everybody can do something and should be expected to do something, even if it is menial work, in order to get their pay, so that there’s a connection to the state sending them money to be able to do something to earn that money. The public wants welfare recipients, who are able to work, to take jobs, and the public wants welfare recipients who can’t find jobs to work at jobs that the state provides in welfare-to-work programs, and require everybody to do something for their pay. The biggest problem with requiring welfare recipients to work is there’s no new money for job placement, employment education, and job training.

Read More
1159 Words | 5 Pages

A common wish among Americans is if they were President they would change so much and do what is best for everyone. Now common sense suggest that this would most likely not happen. Because of the separation of powers created by the constitution the branches of government have the ability to keep each other in check. So this essay is going to be taken from the point of view that separation of powers gives the President a little more ability to pass what laws he wants without having to deal with the congress, senate, and the Supreme Court. With this in mind a controversial topic of today in our country is social services such as the welfare system and food stamps.

Read More
1126 Words | 5 Pages

I agree with this assertion. I believe that there are many Americans that have learned to “cheat” the system. If the government made cutbacks and shrinked the pool of welfare recipients, than it would be less likely that certain Americans could continue cheating the system. This idea will most likely give everyone a fair chance to find a job. There would be almost no reason to have welfare if all Americans were compensated fairly for their work.

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

This results in those that are poor staying poor and those that are rich getting

Read More
1293 Words | 6 Pages

Many pros to the Food Stamp act are avaible. The Program takes care of the needs of a lot of people. The main point for Food Stamps act was to service low income people during a low economic crisis. The program started at two million in 2000 and has quickly rose to 6.4 million. The Food Stamp act offers work to people who need it.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

An article from The Washington Post, “The Double-Standard of Making the Poor Prove They’re Worthy of Government Benefits” by Emily Badger, conveys her insights on the double-standard that is put on citizens who receive welfare benefits. We don’t drug-test farmers who receive agriculture subsidies, college students who receive Pell Grants, and wealthy families who cash in on the home mortgage interest deduction (Badger). No one seems to give a second glance when the government hands out money to farmers, college students, and wealthy home-owners because, when compared to the portion of the population on welfare, society has taught us who is more likely to abuse drugs. In most cases, welfare recipients are given a check from the government about once a month. This is a clear-cut, easy to see benefit.

Read More
831 Words | 4 Pages

Millions of Americans receive government aid such as welfare every year. Of those Americans who are on welfare, many are unemployed. Some people may need welfare because they don’t make enough money to support their families. However, the amount of money spent on welfare every year is tremendous. Welfare should be taken away from those who don’t work.

Read More
393 Words | 2 Pages

I am here to persuade you that making welfare harder to obtain will not only positively affect those who apply, but our nation in a wide-scale socio-economic aspect. C. Preview of Main Points: I will explain where the government gets the money to fund programs, specifically TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families). Personal and socio-economic benefit will be explained. D. Benefit Instead of using money to fund drug use, money will be better spent in other areas within the states. The incentives to stop

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Welfare Reform

Related Topics

Open Document