ipl-logo

The Purpose Of Affirmative Action

1821 Words8 Pages

Affirmative action was implemented as a way to set the standard for common business practices regarding fair employment practices for all. This standard was enforced on a government level for any entities within the government and working for the government (contractors, etc.). The idea was the government would set the standard and others would fall in line. The plan worked on some level and created the Secretary of Labor. Affirmative action was an efficient way to bring the rest of America up-to-speed, and had a definitive purpose when created.
In regards to affirmative action, since 1965, the U.S. Department of Labor's Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) has been committed to ensuring that Government contractors …show more content…

It has promoted the broader cause of racial integration. And it has encouraged the emergence of a black and Latino middle class. “In the sphere of taste, mankind is divided into a multitude of factions and is always likely to remain so. About matters of taste, there is no point in arguing. Disputes are fruitless. Our differences of opinion look irreconcilable. Arguing about such matters will not bring us into agreement. On the contrary, we should wisely live with and gladly tolerate differences of opinion that express divergent tastes. (Adler, Ch 8) Adler called us to regard our peers as equal. Regardless of difference in opinions, race and religion he lets us know this does not …show more content…

Lobbying has become almost legal bribery in some areas of the government. Americans need to see more equality in all things including Affirmative Action. In subsection 204 D from Executive Order 11246 allows an exemption for some contractors and certain agencies from the Affirmative Action clause. It states “The Secretary of Labor may also provide, by rule, regulation, or order, for the exemption of facilities of a contractor that are in all respects separate and distinct from activities of the contractor related to the performance of the contract: provided, that such an exemption will not interfere with or impede the effectuation of the purposes of this Order: and provided further, that in the absence of such an exemption all facilities shall be covered by the provisions of this Order. (Department of Labor, 2015)’. This very broad statement allows for a loophole for any contractor or agency as needed. There certainly can be extenuating circumstances allowing these contractors/agencies to slip by government program screams unfairness to anyone looking in. Removing this subsection or replacing it with something a little more defined would go a long way in alleviating this unfair blanket statement. Anything that replaces it should include which courts or groups should be involved in allowing any such employment group these waivers from fair

Show More
Related
161 Words | 1 Pages

This compromise allowed them to discriminate and exclude Black workers from the AAAs subsidies, meaning

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act History The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 was signed into law by President Barack Obama, January 29, 2009. The purpose and goal of the Lilly Ledbetter Act is to amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This Ledbetter Act states that the 180-day statue of limitations for filing an equal-pay lawsuit regarding pay discrimination resets with each new paycheck affected by that discriminatory action. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilly_Ledbetter_Fair__Pay_Act_of_2009)

Read More
1548 Words | 7 Pages

The federal district court dismissed Ricci’s Title VII and equal protection claims. The Second Circuit upheld the court’s ruling and denied a re-hearing. Finally, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a certiorari. The U.S. Supreme Court brought the question before them according to Charles Mitchell (as cited in Ricci v. DeStefano, 2009) by framing it as “whether the purpose to avoid disparate-impact liability excuses what otherwise would be prohibited disparate-treatment discrimination”.

Read More
1556 Words | 7 Pages

Katznelson’s argument that affirmative action policies were enacted with purposeful, deliberate discrimination is convincing. Namely, he considers the historical context that would have shaped Americans at the time and swayed their opinions. For example, Katznelson references the Civil War and the end of slavery, and how these events shaped the attitudes of key players like the Southern Democrats, which would then result in the faulty policies that perpetuated affirmative action’s favoritism of whites. His evidence is sufficient as well. Katznelson highlights the trend of Southern Democrats interfering in affirmative action policies and the footholds they had in specific acts.

Read More
438 Words | 2 Pages

In the book, “When Affirmative Action Was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth-Century America,” by Ira Katznelson, he takes us, the readers, back to the 1930’s through 1950’s during the when he considered affirmative action to be pro-white rather than today’s perception of affirmative action where we ensure that interviewees are employed, and employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, belief, color, or national origin. Katznelson points out that this period of history was driven by politicians during the New Deal started creating government programs in order to take care of the wellbeing of people, their work, and during World War II in the 1930s and 1940s. The government intentionally single out and treated the vast majority of African Americans very differently. The fundamental issue was the support of Southern representatives in Congress was needed in order for the Democratic leaders to pass laws that are not in favor to African Americans. Simply put, that the New Deal union was being framed as a real mean middle man, making bargains between white people that want to help (aka progressives) and the white people that do not want to help and keep all the government benefit to themselves (aka

Read More
1143 Words | 5 Pages

Even though it is over 60 years later, it is still very relevant today. This act prohibited employers from turning away potential employees based on race, sex, color, religion, or origin. It was a successful attempt at stopping discrimination. A lot of people were turned away from

Read More
155 Words | 1 Pages

Shelby Steele’s perspective about affirmative action is that it’s didn’t help African Americans achieve equality. Continuously, he believes that affirmative action only reinforces the misconception that people should be treated differently according to their outward appearance. Affirmative action is created to improve opportunities for minorities in employment and education. Like any legalization, affirmative action has positive and negative sides, however I disagree with Shelby Steele that negative effect on minorities. In our country, we have decades of racial, economical, and social inequality for minorities, and affirmative action tries to address that disparity.

Read More
322 Words | 2 Pages

The main purpose of Affirmative Action is to put an end to discrimination towards the minorities. Although black citizens were put towards a disadvantage in society with the assistance of Affirmative Action was reversed back towards white citizens. When racials practice that have historically have placed blacks at a disadvantage are removed that is when whites believe that preferential treatment is given back to the blacks. Hill also argues that there needs to be some changes in the labor

Read More
267 Words | 2 Pages

The Act got rid of segregation against blacks in white schools. It made people angry because they did not want black people going to the same school with them. This Act caused many fights and riots. The

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

It established to tear down the restrictions that prevent African Americans to vote. It also states the prohibition of any discrimination when it comes to an individual of color when it comes to voting. This was all established by providing African Americans the 13th amendment. The 13th Amendment gave African Americans freedom to vote, but even after the abolition, they were still treated unfairly. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 banned all cases of discrimination towards race, sex, religion and etc (Document 4).

Read More
627 Words | 3 Pages

Thus, Teachers, lawyers, doctors, business owners and others professions have benefitted from affirmative action

Read More
148 Words | 1 Pages

It was a law that coincided with the minorities, therefore giving them more power. It succeeded because the minorities were unwilling to give up the chance that they have been fighting for. It succeeded cause it made things equal. The problem the law addressed was discrimination in all aspects of employment. The EEOC examines

Read More
1011 Words | 5 Pages

Affirmative action has become obsolete in today’s society. Affirmative action is an active effort to improve the employment or educational opportunities of members of minority groups and women; also: a similar effort to promote the rights or progress of other disadvantaged persons (Merriam-Webster, 2011). Today’s affirmative action will demoralize the very concepts that the policy was implemented to uphold: those of equality for all people regardless of color and discrimination. This policy supports racial multiplicity at the price of distinction, impartiality and experience; it also follows the line of reverse discrimination and sexual bias against white men (Reyna, Tucker, Korfmacher, & Henry, 2005).

Read More
1028 Words | 5 Pages

According to the dominant theory the affirmative action was firstly introduced to deal with two types of social disruption in the 1960s as campus protests and urban riots in the North. However, this article is based on different theory as dominant theory's empirical evidence is limited. It examines the initial reason for advent of race-conscious affirmative action in 17 undergraduate institutions in the United States. And according to the research this article concludes that there were two waves that contributed to affirmative action: 1) first wave in the early 1960s introduced by northern college administrators 2) second wave in the late 1960s introduced as a response to the protests of campus-based students. This article will help me to establish the main reasons for introduction of race-conscious affirmative action in undergraduate

Read More
1734 Words | 7 Pages

This is the next and more profound stage of the battle for civil rights. We seek not just freedom but opportunity––not legal equity but human ability––not just equality as a right and a theory, but equality as a fact and as a result” (Garrison-Wade & Lewis, 2003). That same year, President Johnson signed an executive order mandating government contractors “take affirmative action” in

Read More

More about The Purpose Of Affirmative Action

Related Topics

Open Document