Criminal Justice Today: An Introductory Text for the 21st Century (13th Edition ed.). Retrieved from
“A stop involves only a temporary interference with a person’s liberty” ("Stop and Frisk," n.d.). If the officer finds anything on the person during the frisk, then they officer can make an arrest, otherwise, the person is released ("Stop and Frisk," n.d.). The New York “stop and frisk” law says “police officer may stop any person... in a public place whom he reasonably suspects are committing crimes and may demand… his name, address and an explanation of his actions," and when the officer "suspects that he is in danger…he may search such person for a dangerous weapon" ("Stop and Frisk," n.d.). In this case, Officer Martin, used the fact of knowing Sibron was associating himself with narcotic addicts as probable cause and reasonable suspicion; but it is not justifiable under the Fourth
Therefore the officer held a stop and frisk and found a .38 on both men. Officer McFadden states that he feared the two men may have had a gun. Therefore during an investigation, he does have the right to stop and frisk those men. Any kind of search and seizure must be thought of under the certain circumstances. In this case, it is two men walking past a storefront a few dozen times and having a meeting after every time they walked the block.
In the 1980 's legitimate pressure including police quests was an immediate consequence of the war on medications battle. Officers were urged to stop and seize or look suspicious vehicles to put an end on medication trafficking (Harns, 1998). Be that as it may, setting this forceful methodology into impact had numerous negative results. One issue was that it put police on a slim line with the established laws. To nothing unexpected, practically no information evaluating how frequently police quests fall outside protected laws exist.
The textbook history of Peel’s principles are often referenced as the foundational to modern policing in the 19th century. Criminal Justice may be interpreted in many different ways and through this article the importance of emerging historical scholarship as well as the textbooks gives us a better understanding of criminal justice eventually rethinking of Peels principles. In general, the invention of the Peels principles are found in the 20th century policing textbooks. Furthermore, Peels principles are important in todays criminal justice system and are often used in modern criminal justice education. The history of policing is perhaps brief compared to say the courts or laws.
The criminal justice system as a network of individual entities operates within two models of criminal justice. The crime control model is oriented towards community protection and swift punishment for crimes whereas the due process model is concerned with legal and equal rights of all citizens including suspects. Both models are reflected at different levels of the criminal justice system where for example the police acts within the crime control model and the courts within the due process model. The 2003 documentary “Capturing Friedman” by Andrew Jarecki is a prime example of the crime control model of criminal justice system that can blur the line between victim and offender. It also highlights the lack of rights for the accused especially
Name: Bisi Alade Date: November 25th, 2015 Article 1 Nahal Zamani. “The Human Impact.” (July 2012): 1-33. Web http://ccrjustice.org/sites/default/files/attach/2015/08/the-human-impact-report.pdf Center for Constitutional Right is a non-profit legal advocacy organization, affiliated with New York City, around for 49 years; co-founded in 1966 by William Kunstler. Nahal Zamani led the research effort, conducted and compiled the interview, nurtured community connections, and wrote the first draft of the report.
Tiana McCroskey Criminal Procedure Jamal Lopez 04, March 2016 Stop, Question and Frisk policy Stop, question, and frisk is an NYPD policy where a police officer can detain a suspect, question them and frisk them by patting down the suspect’s clothing based off reasonable suspicion. (Washington post).Stop and frisk policy is a controversial issue due to the rise of disagreement with in the public. Are the reforms to stop and frisk policy making New York City dangerous again? In order to answer that question we must first have to analyze the pros and cons of the policy to determine a proper answer for the question. Let’s first take a look at some positive attributes of this policy.
So, then the officer will go and ask them questions and then feel around the person’s outer garments such as pants, waist, by the sock area, jacket (if worn at time) only to check for a concealed weapon and/or contraband. Never should the officer go inside the person’s pockets, shoe, or their pants. Stop and frisk is one of the most controversial police procedures that there are. This is a limited search that should only be performed when an officer has reasonable suspicions on a suspect. The American courts adopted stop and frisk from the British command
The practical imperative orders that we never use people as a means to an end, or for any reason; People can’t be used to further an agenda, or for a result. The intent of aggressive stop and frisks may be a variety of reasons, officer safety, to create police omnipresence, or to further the individual police officer’s profiling agenda. The stop and frisk policy includes the use of many people in 2015, of the 22,939 citizens who were stopped, only 20% of them were arrested. This means that 18,353 completely innocent citizens were inconvenienced, and possibly afraid. The standard of suspicion for stop and frisk is only reasonable suspicion.
In this paper many will understand the concepts and the role of a stop and frisks. It will allow the readers to see the good and perhaps the bad of stop and frisk process. The research will also allow the readers to see how law enforcement can abuse power of authority in certain situation. Stop and frisk can be good and evil depending on the type of police officer at the time using his or her belief of the “Golden Rule” (meaning treating others with respect as everyone wants to be treated.) Stop and frisk is when police temporarily detain somebody and pat down their outer clothing when there are specific articulable facts leading a reasonable police officer to believe a person is armed and dangerous.
This article provided a look into the morality of a police officer and the decisions that are made that may be questionable. The authors use the film Dirty Harry to describe what is known as the Dirty Harry Problem. Using the example of shooting a criminal’s leg in order to get more information about a kidnapping and ransom case. This act of using a gun with excessive force is not necessarily the “right” thing to do. This is just one example and many more are provided in the article.
Assignment #1 Review questions Chap. 1 p. 26: 1. A single standard of ethics cannot be applied to all criminal justice agencies. The world is too complex to legislate morality and ethics. The cultures that make up each part of the world are not the same.
The trials of evolving practices that at the same time guarantee civil rights fortifications and public security are multifarious and serious. The atmosphere in which law enforcement officers must function is ever fluctuating; anticipations have been af-fected significantly by the happenings of September 11, 2001 over and above by modifications conveyed about by new technology and interconnected
It is easy to learn about a subject from a book, but it is an entirely different matter to learn about a subject through real life experience. I hope to learn how to serve and protect while implementing the law correctly, especially in today’s world when the level of support for police officers is very low and the level of misconduct cases concerning the police are very high. It is not easy to know what to do in every situation, especially when some reactions are needed with very little or no time to think about. It is one thing to hear about a crime happening and the response that would be best to give, and another thing to need
