ipl-logo

The Role Of King Henry VIII In Mind Of A Tyrant

813 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: History of king henry viii

The modern film, Mind of a Tyrant portrays the King of England, Henry VIII, as an oppressive ruler. During his reign, Henry brought doom to the land of Britain with his overwhelming sexual desires, immaturity, and will power. In reality, the power enjoyed by England’s most infamous king varied throughout his reign. There were times where his power seemed to be easily swayed and manipulated by various flatterers, including his most personal advisors. In 1509, Henry stepped into his position as king. During Henry’s early years of reign, he naturally embraced his youth, possessing young, lively, and immature qualities. There were two great advantages Henry had. Once he ascended to the throne, his treasury was already in place and it not take much work for him to gain such power. Unfortunately, the king occupied himself with the pleasures and benefits of fame and power more than he did with ruling his country effectively. This did not benefit the country in any way. …show more content…

He came into conflict with anyone who opposed him or his views. He carried himself as a supreme individual and focused on his own ambition rather than the good of the people. This course touches on political and social components during the period. The influential society and intellectuals of this era caused issues throughout the modern period. However, these conflicts are what helped make history. The Henry the VIII: Mind of a Tyrant movie associates with the context of this course directly because of the way it covers a various amounts of the material that humans should learn as common knowledge and as it is in relation with the

Show More
Related
1230 Words | 5 Pages

This is shown through Henry recognising the importance of finance in methods of gaining power through loyalty and outside the country, as stated above and in the use of bonds and recognisances to consolidate his dynasty. This is demonstrated additionally in Henry’s use of the Chamber System where Henry would personally check all the items of income received in the chamber and sign each one, and the position of Treasurer of the Chamber was held by two of the king’s most beloved servants; Sir Thomas Lovell and Sir John Heron. However there is one unconvincing phrase in the interpretation of Henry’s attitude towards money, that his reputation as a miser was a result of a ‘misunderstanding of his policies’ which doesn’t take into account the extortionate reputation of Empsen and Dudley through their exploitation, therefore not showing the full extent of Henry’s dedication to

Read More
854 Words | 4 Pages

The implication is that the people are being ruled. Henry used his skills in speech to persuade the Council or Parliament that trying to rule over others was wrong. He spoke out against the way things had always been done and

Read More
380 Words | 2 Pages

First of all, King was being criticized for making troubles in people’s city

Read More
1094 Words | 5 Pages

When you develop the culture, he gives the citizens more pride. And the politics, he wanted everyone to have a say in the leadership of their country. He wanted everyone to able to participate in elections, and he wanted the heads of state that sat in the

Read More
718 Words | 3 Pages

(Henry). The desire to fight was strong with those who had had enough of the king’s oppression. Patrick Henry presents his beliefs with passion and

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

Such as Frederick William I of Prussia, otherwise known as “The Soldier King”. He increased his army, and land which therefore increased his power over the country. By increasing his army he made his country feel safe, and instilled fear in his people. This caused for his power over the people to increase therefore allowing him to become an absolute monarch. Louis the XIV also increased his military powers, which increased his total power.

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

But they put themselves in a level with wood and earth and stones [...] than men of straw or a lump of dirt’’. Henry’s ethos shows the audience of his strategy of going against the government corruption. Henry’s speech was well-planned out to shows his audience of his experience when rebelling the government; in addition, receiving forced punishment for not paying his poll-tax. He thought out things that made himself to commit this disobedience against the government and wanted to express his experience of his ideas and strategy to disobey the government.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

In certain cases, can violence be a better option than peace? In “Speech in the Virginia Convention,” Patrick Henry explains the necessity for fighting against the British to the delegates in the Virginia Convention. Henry develops his viewpoint by describing how fighting for freedom from the British is a better option for the colonies than keeping peace with the British and how the war for freedom is inevitable. One way Patrick Henry develops his viewpoint is by explaining how fighting for freedom from the British is better than keeping peace with them. In his speech, Henry proposes the question, “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?”

Read More
1545 Words | 7 Pages

‘The consolidation of royal authority, in the years 1487-1509, was due to Henry VII’s control over the nobility.’ Explain why you agree or disagree with this view. It can be argued to a certain extent that the consolidation of royal authority for Henry VII, in the years 1487-1509, was a result of control over the nobility. The challenge lied in the ability to decrease their power without alienating them whilst removing their position of threat. However, there were other contributory factors in Henry’s consolidation of his royal authority, such as his diplomatic skills in dealing with foreign powers and the indispensable use of royal finances.

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

“Henry did not face a genuine threat to his position as King from 1485-99.” Explain why you agree or disagree with this view. [25 marks] I find I partly disagree with the statement. Although it’s true that Henry VII was able to overcome all of the major threats to his reign during this period of time, and some of these threats were not as major as others - that does not necessarily mean any of the events were not dangerous enough to jeopardise Henry’s position as King. Notably, Perkin Warbeck’s ability to gain support from many royals around Europe put Henry into a position where he could likely be usurped, had Henry not been smart with his foreign relations, and had the imposter had sufficient military support in order to successfully land in England.

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

Although Henry did not alway carry himself with much dignity in his early years, he is portrayed as a powerful and honorable. Being a king puts him at the top of the social ladder, and garners respect from almost all below him. Along with this respect though, comes expectations. Henry is expected to be fearless and fair based upon his position in society.

Read More
1105 Words | 5 Pages

King Henry is portrayed to us as the main leader within the English ranks and an important component of their strategy. One characteristic of Henry’s leadership is that he is able to forge close connections with his men. During the Battle of Harfleur, we see him describe his men as “dear

Read More
1517 Words | 7 Pages

In great literature there are often characters who are deceitful to others to carry out a greater purpose. By doing so the character often compromises relationships with friends and family but it can also compromise the safety of the character and others around them. In the play Hamlet Shakespeare uses Hamlet’s character to elaborate on this situation, Claudius is deceiving his family and friends for a greater purpose which at times seems to do more bad than good. Claudius deceives many people in the tragedy Hamlet.

Read More
538 Words | 3 Pages

Henry’s temper is hard for him to control because he is sometimes faced with situations when he cannot distinguish between King Henry and friend Henry. This duality, paired with the duality that is being a king is an obvious cause for confusion and rage. Henry had such a strong bond with his old friends, that when his new friends were so quick to betray him he was deeply hurt. Another time Henry exhibits incomplete control of his temper is during the battle of Agincourt. Throughout the battle, Henry’s soldiers have taken many French soldiers prisoner and seem to have the advantage.

Read More
2026 Words | 9 Pages

He encompassed one of the most essential traits of being a leader, which is being authentic. This is evident in him understanding his purpose of being king; which was to bring change into the dictator political infrastructure. He practiced solid values such as integrity through demonstrating to people that he is not deviating from his purpose of bringing democracy as well as demonstrating self-discipline through adjusting his actions to meet his purpose. He established enduring relationships to ensure that people know that he cares about what they want and how he is going to do it. And lastly, he demonstrated courage through standing up against the bunker whom embraces an opposite political mindset as the one he envisioned for the future.

Read More

More about The Role Of King Henry VIII In Mind Of A Tyrant

Related Topics

Open Document