ipl-logo

The Speedy Trial Act (1974)

647 Words3 Pages

The Sixth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution, the Speedy Trial Act of 1974 and the states’ constitutional or statutory provisions establish the right to a speedy trial of criminal defendants. In particular, the 6th Amendment’s Clause states that “in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial” (Susskind, 1993).While the U. S. Constitution does not provide a precise frame of time, states’ laws specify the time within which prosecution must try a defendant. However, the computations are so complex that cases are rarely dismissed on the ground of violation of the speedy trial right (Shestokas, 2014). In fact, ironically defendants have to demand a speedy trial for these time periods to run and their …show more content…

The same principle was included in 1776 into the Virginia Declaration of Rights and then incorporated by the Framers into the Bill of Rights (Legal Information Institute, n. d.). Nowadays, the Right to a Speedy Trial is among the basic rights ensured by the Constitution, since embodies one of the fundamental liberties granted to the American citizens. The term “speedy”, although quite relative, indicates that the defendant should be brought to trial within a reasonable time after being arrested. Otherwise, the charges should be dismissed. Basically, there are three main sets of reasons behind the rationale of the Speedy Trial Clause. In the first place, obviously, there is the purpose of effectuating the right of the defendant to a speedy trial. Also, the Clause is aimed to support the public interest, as well as the victims’ and witnesses’ rights to an accurate but timely conclusion of a criminal case. Finally, a Speedy Trial should further an effective use of public resources (American Bar Association, n.

Show More
Related
1082 Words | 5 Pages

The landmark Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) ruled that the 6th amendment obligated federal and state government to provide an attorney to anyone who could not afford one. Gideon v Wainwright ruled in favor of public defenders to create a mechanism which limited the government’s power by having them prove their convictions beyond a reasonable doubt. Currently, the Supreme Court ruling has created enormous caseloads that many busy courts struggle to handle. As a solution to the problems of high caseloads, plea bargaining has become the primary method of closing cases. Although achieving greater efficiency for the criminal justice is necessary, overly utilizing plea bargains weakens the criminal justice as it fails to reinforce the principles established in Gideon v Wainwright by foregoing trials.

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

This posed two main Constitutional questions: Do non-capital felony defendants still get the sixth amendment?s right to counsel in state courts? Should all states have to provide counsel in their courts for indigent defendants just as federal courts do, no matter what type of case it may be? (Street Law, 2012) The case of Gideon v. Wainwright helped bring into light and define the full rights of the accused. Through dealing with the sixth amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, it focused on the key aspect of appointing counsel for any defendant, and made one way our country handles criminal justice synonymous between state and federal

Read More
921 Words | 4 Pages

This means that those charged with lesser crimes are pushed to the back of their caseloads. Public defenders are overworked and underpaid meaning that many times they cannot do their job to the best of their abilities. Sadly because of this system, many of their clients sit in holding cells for months or years, awaiting for a trial that is continually pushed off by their attorney. While the system of free public defenders seemed like an equal foot for criminal clients to stand on in the justice system, it is in reality a very messy and disorganized system that overlooks those without the most pressing issue. Gideon V. Wainright was a landmark case, arguably one of the most important cases of the sixties.

Read More
1415 Words | 6 Pages

David Feige’s Indefensible: One Lawyer’s Journey nto the Inferno of American Justice invites people from all walks of life to a second hand experience of the criminal justice system hard at work. What is most interesting about Feige’s work is its distinct presentation of the life of a public defender in the South Bronx. Instead of simply detailing out his experiences as a public defender, Feige takes it a step further and includes the experiences of his clients. Without the personal relationships that he carefully constructs with each of his defendants, Feige would not be able to argue that the criminal justice system is flimsy at best, decisions always riding on either the judge’s personal attitudes or the clients propensity towards plea bargaining.

Read More
1559 Words | 7 Pages

Fracture is a movie that focuses on the court proceedings of an attempted murder trial and emphasizes the legal aspects of this event. In the film, there are several instances in which the Constitutional Amendments are used in the movie as positive or negative rulings in the court. Because this is a movie follows a complex court case, it is an excellent source for these Constitutional Amendments and provides a multitude of examples to accurately represent the commonly used amendments in trials and arrests. This movie focuses primarily on the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution, as well as the basic concepts of criminal justice.

Read More
1102 Words | 5 Pages

The Scopes Trial John Scopes, a high school biology teacher, who found himself at the center of one of the 20th century’s most famous life-changing court hearings; The Scopes Trial. It was also known as the Monkey Trial, where biology teacher John Scopes was prosecuted for teaching evolution in a public school located in Tennessee (Kemper). Prior to the trial, there was a anti-evolution law that was passed making Scopes actions illegal, this was known as The Butler Act. As a matter of fact, when Scopes went against this law it was the first step in moving towards modernism. As well as, causing America to move away from traditional values.

Read More
1151 Words | 5 Pages

Due Process Revolution Shantel Randolph CRM 322 Law of Criminal Procedure Saint Leo University Due Process Revolution Due Process Due process is basically a procedure that guarantees the rights of individuals during the criminal law proceedings and ensures the fair and unbiased legal proceedings. 5th and 14th amendments cover this process and propose that an individual as full right to know about the charges that have been accused against her or him, in addition, s/he also have right to put forward their stance, in self defense, during the court proceedings. The purpose behind it is to grant the individuals against possible chaotic actions by the state. The whole process covers a wide range of procedures and rules that

Read More
1186 Words | 5 Pages

Twelve Angry Men is in many ways a love letter to the American legal justice system. We find here eleven men, swayed to conclusions by prejudices, past experience, and short-sightedness, challenged by one man who holds himself and his peers to a higher standard of justice, demanding that this marginalized member of society be given his due process. We see the jurors struggle between the two, seemingly conflicting, purposes of a jury, to punish the guilty and to protect the innocent. It proves, however, that the logic of the American trial-by-jury system does work.

Read More
301 Words | 2 Pages

The Administration of Justice Act of 1774 was one of five laws passed by the British Parliament and which was known as one of the Intolerable or Coercive Acts. The Boston Massacre of 1770, Tea Tax of 1773, and Boston Tea Party of 1773 led to this act. They boycotted many items .They formed protest groups that wrote letters to England and sent letters around the colonies letting them know what was going on. They left England to get away from British rule and they did so much more.

Read More
148 Words | 1 Pages

They added speedy process to the constitution because there was a time when you could be locked up for a long amount of time without a trial and sometimes that person never got a trial so they added a speedy trial so that everyone has the right to a trial and to face the witness

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

The Constitution states “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.” ( US Constitution) As you can see, the Bill of Rights 6th Amendment allows the accused to understand the charges against them: the accused is told what he/ she is being accused of, who is accusing them, and is allowed to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty. Moreover, it allows for the movement of rightful convictions.

Read More
1029 Words | 5 Pages

The due process model concentrates less on the speed and determination of a case and more on the well ordered examination of individual due process rights given to the criminal respondent. As you find out about these models, it would be very helpful to get comfortable with the criminal equity handle, or the stream of a case through the criminal equity

Read More
809 Words | 4 Pages

Furthermore, the 6th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects the rights of the accused by allowing the defendant the right to confront his or hers accusers with the 6th Amendments” Confrontational Clause”. The defense attorney, like the prosecution, interviews witnesses that will bear testimony to offset the prosecution’s efforts to convict the defendant. During the Preliminary Hearing, the defense attorney screens and interviews witnesses` that are credible and therefore will bring forth testimony that will persuade the jury by discrediting the prosecutions witnesses’ during the actual trial

Read More
953 Words | 4 Pages

Jed Rakoff, US Distrit judge in the Southern District of New York mentions, “Innocent persons are convicted of capital crimes… by cutting off the opportunity for exoneration, denies due process and, indeed, is tantamount to foreseeable…” Many capital punishments are processed in a relatively fast manner that does not allow the accused to prove innocent. This violates the Fifth Amendment which rules that accused people should be given a due process of law. Humans are, indeed, never perfect.

Read More
1737 Words | 7 Pages

This essay will evaluate the components of the Bail Act 1976 and assess the prospects for Mr Rawlins being granted bail. This is a bail application that is subject to factors that are either supportive of bail or not supportive of bail. The Bail Act 1976 gives a general right to bail, regardless of how serious the offense. In the BA Act 1976, if the defendant does not surrender to the authority they are naturally guilty of an offense.

Read More

More about The Speedy Trial Act (1974)

Related Topics

Open Document