The True Lust In Miller's Definition Of Love

928 Words4 Pages

(Love isn't rainbows and sunshine love is nothing but lust) Now there are those who skepticize love and feel it's a made up emotion to cover up what it truly is; lust. There feelings drive from the experience that love is useless. Miller justifies this reason with, “Love is a product of our economic system.” Miller is claiming love is nothing but a business. Love is only used for profit by preying on the weak minded who let their emotions takes over their actions. Love is a more advanced form of lust. He claims that we seek a “partner to Love” in efforts to satisfy personal goals one might have. Miller states,“People don’t need your crappy love. They just want your respect and validation as a worthwhile being.” Miller is hoping to conveys to the audience the definition of love is finding someone who gives you validation of your worth. Whereas you shouldn't seek for validation when it comes to love. Miller begins to further his reasoning for why love is not worth it, but justifies love is nothing but lust. Miller goes on to argue,“We should spend less time obsessing about love and …show more content…

You are not alone everyone doubts whether there love is true. Love is a gamble you roll the dice and hope you get two sixes. Even if you loose keep rolling the dice until you win. Love is giving yourself to someone in which you can open up to the fullest as if your minds are intwined. Love is when your instincts tell you to care or protect. Love will change you even if you don't want to be changed. Molding you into the best you possible. It comes with pain but that doesn't mean give up.Some say it's useless nothing but lust and only used to continue the human race. Love is a force like no other and once it grabs you there is no escape. Love will always be worth the pain the stress and confusion because love is what fills the void inside you. Let love do its job and show you why you need