In his essay, "The Truth About Plagiarism," Richard A. Posner disrupts the prevailing narrative that plagiarism is an unforgivable intellectual transgression. As a distinguished judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals and a senior lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School, Posner's authority on legal and ethical matters is unquestionable. He challenges the commonly held belief that plagiarism constitutes the ultimate intellectual crime, urging readers to adopt a more nuanced perspective on this contentious issue. Posner's audience spans a wide spectrum, including writers, teachers, journalists, scholars, and the general public. Citing recent plagiarism scandals involving prominent individuals like Jayson Blair, Posner highlights the relevance of his argument in contemporary discourse. He evokes empathy by illustrating the devastating consequences of plagiarism, such as career derailment for politicians, expulsion for college students, and reputational damage for writers, scholars, and journalists. This emotional appeal resonates with readers, emphasizing the human toll of plagiarism scandals. …show more content…
He asserts, "If a thief steals your car, you are out the market value of the car; but if a writer copies material from a book you wrote, you don't have to replace the book." This distinction underscores the ethical complexity of plagiarism and challenges readers to reconsider its societal implications. Posner's expertise as a legal scholar enhances the credibility of his argument. He further states, "Plagiarism can be a form of fraud, but it is no accident that, unlike real theft, it is not a crime." This distinction between plagiarism and criminal theft highlights the unique ethical considerations