In The Rise of the Plebiscitary Presidency, Professor Craig Rimmerman argues against the “plebiscitary presidency”, where the president governs through the direct support of the American people. Rimmerman argues that the Framers of the Constitution assumed that the legislative branch would serve as the central policymaking role. The modern plebiscitary presidency has been shaped by the tremendous amount of personal power drawn from the people through the Supreme Court and Congress. Rimmerman argues that the consequence of a presidentially-centered form of government that Neustadt and other scholars failed to recognize is that presidents will strive to meet the expectations that come with the new presidency to the extreme, where they will exert
Through her writing, Janice Fabro describes how plagiarism contains both direct and indirect negative outcomes. Direct effects of plagiarism include failure in a class, but
As I engage this unit’s Read and Attend assignments, I find that my understanding of plagiarism is not as fully developed as I had previously thought. Our Unit 3 Attend assignment shares that “in a general sense plagiarism may be caused by carelessness” and these circumstances frequently precipitate the lack of care required while writing (Bethel University, 2014, p. 11). The academic integrity tutorial provided additional information which I found valuable as well. Common themes within each unit assignment provide strands of continuity, while assisting with a more comprehensive understanding. It is my opinion, the type of plagiarism that is hardest for me to avoid is “plagiaphrasing”, also known as “lazy paraphrasing” (Bethel University, 2014, p. 12).
In Loye Youngs's essay, “Is Humiliation an Ethically Appropriate Response to Plagiarism?” Loye Young claims that the action he took against students who plagiarized is valid. He justifies his claim by listing his moral beliefs and using an example of Senator Joseph Biden plagiarism story. Six students were caught for a common act, they all submitted a plagiarized paper. Loye Young states that even after a well-reviewed and clear syllabus he is "surprised by how common and blatant plagiarism turned out to be" (Young, 191).
Rhetorical Comparison Bill Clinton, in his speech, “Oklahoma Bombing Memorial Address”, he states information about the oklahoma bombing to express thoughts and feelings about the Oklahoma bombing and show sorrow for all the people who have lost family and friends. His speech compares to Robert F. Kennedy's speech “A Eulogy For Dr.Martin Luther King, Jr.” by Showing sorrow and trying to comfort people in the tragedy of a loss among people. Robert F. Kennedy uses ethos by stating that a member of his family had been killed and was a candidate for president. Bill Clinton uses ethos calling himself president and an american. Bill Clinton uses logos by trying to make a tragedy become something to improve upon, like when he
In matters of environmental preservation, one has two options; extol the virtues of economic expansion, or shelter the wounded environment- an angel and devil perched upon shoulders situation of sorts. In building his argument, human rights activist and 39th president of the United States of America Jimmy Carter displays a commendable zeal for his cause whilst skillfully utilizing the element of persuasion to transcend the “devil”. No one is blind to the suffering caused by environmental abuse, but Carter draws a dagger of emotion, veiled by stylistic phrasing and subtle remarks, and plunges it into the heart of his opposers with this passage, ensuring no blind eye may be turned to the fate of his country. Changing the opinion of an opposer
Plagiarism is a huge ordeal; whether it be a college research paper or an author writing a story that seems vaguely like another well-known story. What is plagiarism? According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary plagiarism is: to steal and pass off the ideas or words of another as one's own, to use another's production without crediting the source, to commit literary theft, or to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source. If someone plagiarizes in college, that person can end up failing the class and possibly be kicked out of school. If an author “plagiarizes” another author’s piece of work, what happens then?
Richard Murphy's "Anorexia: A Cheating Disorder." is an essay that uses an ethos driven language to communicate the "perversity" of plagiarism in school writing assignments. The need to communicate is kindled by contrasting two writing papers that present accomplishments and incompetency at the same time due to "discontinuities" in the sentences. The foundation of this essay rests on a circumstantial evidence found through a paper turned in by a male student in the past, which leads to questioning the credibility of a female student's paper in the future, only for Murphy to discover later that it wasn't plagiarized. However, Murphy wasn't completely wrong, but he wasn't right either. Murphy understands the importance of the issues confronted
Vice presidents act as the president's right hand. In case of an emergency, they are next in line to become president. The U.S. Constitution assigns the Vice President to act as the presiding officer of the Senate. But the Vice President also serves as ceremonial assistant to the President and is an important part of his administration. They exercised their policy power through their membership on various policy commissions, councils, and task forces.
Barack Obama’s New Hampshire Primary speech has a lot of examples of allusion and intertextuality that are used to motivate the American people. Obama’s speech gives examples of past experiences that America has been through to prove that America has gone through a lot to get where it is now. He also uses allusion to give examples of areas where we can grow as a country. The speech was written in 2008, therefore he is using examples that are different than the events that might be used today.
Does it ever occur to you why people copy each other? With the play 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose is about 12 jurors who are on a murder trial for a premeditated homicide which was conducted by an inner-city teenager. These men are isolated in a limited conference room to deliberate whether or not the boy is guilty. During the heated conversation, personal tensions arise which makes the case harder than it should be. When personal arguments aroused a particular one stood out, copying everyone’s opinions makes you not behave according to what is morally right, although in addition to being fair.
Having consideration of these thoughts will lead to knowing that nervous beginners can result in cheating students. To prevent these products, there should be a course on how to handle the temptation of cheating, also the teaching of what is and what is not plagiarism. In Source C, the following students are instructed to discuss examples of plagiarism, probably examples that the students are prone to do. After the interaction with their peers, they are to have a presentation explaining what they feel the subject did in the example of plagiarism and what should be the consequences. As you can see, this is a more reasonable way to handle academic dishonesty because the student teaches her or himself the effect of claiming work that is not truly labeled as theirs.
The greatest president that has ever served the United States is George Washington. He was not only the first president of the United States but also the commander in chief of the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War. He was victorious over the British and quickly became a hero doing so. He helped draft the constitution and with his leadership and courage. As first president, he become a role model for every other present succeeding him and helped create our countries values that we cherish so much today.
Reader Response #1 James E.Porter / Carl Rogers In the article of James Porter’s “Intertextuality and the Discourse Community,” the author states that in order for one to understand the other, they first understand it by another. What that means to me is that we learn through means of other text or others and not truly by ourselves, because we gather information from around us and then proceed to generate our own opinions or ideas/ideals by our own surroundings. Porter also mentions and talks about how if you nitpick and view text in a way of plagiarism in some way or another it technically would fall under that category. He goes off to mention that Thomas Jefferson is loosely the author of the Declaration of Independence.
People wonder what is so wrong with cheating or plagiarism. As long as they get the work done or pass the course. But do these students know the real consequences of cheating and plagiarism. Viewing different people aspect of this problem, this happens everywhere. In Brent Staples article “Cutting and Pasting: A senior thesis by (Insert Name)”, he is trying to get through to individuals so that they could stop doing this and the consequences.
