When I think of imprisonment I think of a person being in prison for a really serious violent crime so this case wasn’t a big of a surprise. I am a person that believes that there should be many more alternatives to what most believes is meant to happen to a person that has committed a crime and believes the only method is imprisonment.
The utilitarian hypothesis of discipline looks to rebuff guilty parties to encourage, or deflect, future wrongdoing. Under the utilitarian rationality, laws ought to be utilized to expand the joy of society. Since wrongdoing and discipline are conflicting with joy, they ought to be kept to a base. Utilitarian comprehend that a wrongdoing free society does not exist, but rather they attempt to dispense just as
…show more content…
It perceives that discipline has results for both the guilty party and society and holds that the individual created by the discipline ought to surpass the individuals cleverness.
I am on the side of the son, since I am one of those people that believes that not every situation deserves prison and there are some that can do better by getting help for the reason that sent them to prison. What I mean is the underlying reasons can play a big part on a person for breaking the law and in the case selling drugs to support drug habit. At the end of the day, discipline ought not be boundless. One outline of consequentialism in discipline is the arrival of a jail detainee experiencing an incapacitating ailment.
Prison can be a place to punish drug offences, but when there is a person that sells drugs to support their drug use I will have to say that in this case why not use alternative methods that will help the person with the main issue here which is addiction. This person should have been placed in the drug court program which could have been very helpful in helping the mother find other means of support and also to help her get off the drugs with program supervision. Today drug courts are more helpful than prison and gives victims that chance to change their lives for the better and to also be able to stay in the home with their families. I would send this person to jail if the crime was associated with violent acts associated with the crime and look at alternatives sentencing for non-violent crimes and