In Hobbes’ Leviathan, man’s understanding of good and evil is explored in great depth. Furthermore, Hobbes argue that men are in constant conflict over what is deemed good or evil, for there is no universal definition for them. Hobbes is also very cynical men and their ability to reason what is good and evil. It is from these distinctions of good and evil that men are propelled into the state of war of all against all. Despite the degree of conflict over the notion of good and evil inherent in men in the State of Nature, Hobbes identifies that all men see peace as being fundamentally good and the state of nature as evil. It is through the fundamental law of nature--to seek peace-- that Hobbes recognizes the necessity of creating a commonwealth. …show more content…
Hobbes states that “good and evil are names that signify our appetites and aversions” (XV.40). in this context, Hobbes believes that there lies variation across every man in the state of nature. Furthermore, man’s moral reasoning is shaped by a plethora of other factors. Such factors shape man’s experience, and thus create a different appetites and aversions, for men are distinguishable “in different tempers, customs, and doctrines” (XV.40).Therefore, it is understood that man’s notion of good is relative to his specific circumstances. Furthermore, given that man is subject to change in his passions and aversions, Hobbes also recognizes that what men believe is good can change. Hobbes points out that it is also through this fluctuation of what man finds good that leads to “disputes, controversies, and at last war” …show more content…
By eating of the tree of knowledge over good and evil, Eve sought to be more like God. This awareness of what is good and evil was therefore inherent in man as a result of Adam and Eve’s disobedience. Hobbes argues however, that Adam and Eve “acquired no new ability to distinguish between them” (XX. 17). By this statement hobbes is testifying to the fact that men can be aware of a presence of good and evil, their final judgement over what is good and evil lacks a consensus with all other men. It is strikingly ambiguous for Hobbes to include The Fall in evidencing his claim regarding man’s State of Nature. Hobbes’ inclusion of The Fall seems to imply that the state of nature in men is the same as the state of the