Was he justified In Jon Krakauer's book Into the Wild, the main character, Chris McCandless, makes the decision to leave his family and embark on a journey of self-discovery. This decision ultimately leads to his tragic death in the Alaskan wilderness. The question arises whether Chris was justified in leaving his family and pursuing his own desires . Chris had a strained relationship with his family. He felt suffocated by their expectations and the pressure they put on him to conform to their ideals. He wanted to break free from this and find his own path in life. In this sense, it can be argued that Chris had a valid reason for leaving his family. He wanted to discover who he truly was and what he wanted out of life, and he felt that …show more content…
He wanted to live a life of simplicity and to be free from the materialism that he saw as corrupting society. However, his actions could also be viewed as selfish and immature. He left his family without warning or explanation and did not think about the impact it would have on them u realize this on page 37 when he gives his entry about living life to the fullest Chris's actions were also dangerous and reckless. He had no experience or training for living in the wilderness, and he put himself in a dangerous situation without any means of communication or assistance. It could be argued that his decision to leave his family was not only selfish but also stupid Now, there are still plenty of angles to look at this situation. You can look at it from his family's view of being pissed off, scared, even that their son took off and disappeared with no trace whatsoever. His on pages 129-130, it talks about his family grieving for him. His mom saying she doesn't understand why he took those risks and his sister saying she can't go a day without crying for him. Then there's the side of Chris,