ipl-logo

Transcendental Argument Analysis

349 Words2 Pages
Personally, I believe the conclusion of the transcendental argument for the existence of God. In my opinion, Immanuel Kant is more credible because he created the argument and supported it using many examples, whereas Michael Martin only found errors with the TAG. I agree with Kant because this theory is a cause and effect, meaning that God’s existence caused human reason. In Critique of Pure Reason, Kant states that logic originates from an individual’s belief in God. If someone believes that God created the world, then He is the reason why the laws of logic exist. Everything humans know today is because God himself made it that way. Humanity can be logically explained by God’s existence because if we believe in the religious stories which
Open Document