ipl-logo

Morenoff And Astor Argumentative Analysis

558 Words3 Pages

Daniel Garcia
TH 1:30-2:50pm
March 14, 2017
Advanced Concepts in Criminal Justice
From the works of Morenoff and Astor, we are to explain why crime might be higher among second generation immigrant Americans. Though there are many assimilation theories which coincides with this, Portes and Zhou’s theory of segmented assimilation stands up to be the strongest of them all. My reasoning behind it is based on the array of the data from Morenoff and Astor collected in this article and my own interpretation which I experienced first hand. The article shows segmented assimilation branching out to two main scenarios of the straight line assimilation, the positive and the negative.
Segmented assimilation is carried though by the immigrants themselves or by their offspring adopting aspects of the culture in which they 're residing in. These characteristic could be either detrimental or an advantage to their way of life in that certain community. For instance in the article, it showed the second generation of foreign born second generation immigrants to have …show more content…

This leads to the kids not wanted to do better in terms of attending school, obtaining a good paying job, and avoiding crime. As shown in the article, the second generation offspring eventually grew up assimilating the crooked ways of living, such as I’ve seen from some of my acquaintances that I watched slowly succumb to detrimental side of assimilation. Just as my friends and I made pacts to strive to success, they made pacts to strive to failure. Failure as in dropping out and turning to drug dealers, or getting on the wrong side of the law which for some, ended in death. The way I see it, the more positive guidance a child has growing up, especially at the delinquency age of 11-17, the more likely their chances of swaying away from crime increases, and vice

Show More
Related

Lewis And Clark Argumentative Analysis

180 Words | 1 Pages

After much debate, America finally offered $15 million for the land and France gladly accepted. April 30, 1803 the treaty was written making Louisiana officially American land. Some people however, were upset with the buy. They had believed that the new land would take all the attention and the older eastern land would get forgotten.

Read More

Nora Rodriguez Argumentative Analysis

67 Words | 1 Pages

Nora Rodriguez is ahero because she helps immigrants with their immigration paper work. The article states that "a honduran women runs a business helping central americans with thier immagration paper work. Also she is a hero because she spoke up for the people about thier injusties. The article says that "she has gone from simply providing a support service to demmanding change regarding the injustes and discrimination.

Read More

General Zaroff Argumentative Analysis

392 Words | 2 Pages

Secondly, General Zaroff evokes a level of terror never experienced before by the victim. When Rainsford first meets General Zaroff, he thinks of him as an affable man but really the General has been waiting to hunt Rainsford ever since he entered the house. As the General and Rainsford are talking about hunting General Zaroff reveals that hunting animals does not interest him anymore. The general said “We will have some capital hunting, you and I” (Connell 6). This statement makes Rainsford nervous because the General says he does not hunt animals anymore but he still hunts a very dangerous game.

Read More

Durin Argumentative Analysis

539 Words | 3 Pages

What a president must know in order to handle his role as the most powerful man in the country has been up for debate for decades. There are some that believe the role is best served as a minimalist president in which the president allows his delegates to have more power in making decisions. Some believe that a “Self Reliant President” who takes the personal responsibility of handling most presidential responsibilities is best. Strategic competence is a mix of both approaches is which some situations are handled by the president’s delegates and some by the president himself. Every president have strategic competence in order to best govern the nation.

Read More

Mike Webster Essay

124 Words | 1 Pages

Dr. Bennet Omalu said, “I wish I never met Mike Webster. CTE has driven me into the politics of science, the politics of the NFL. You can’t go against the NFL. They will squash you.” Dr. Bennet is saying the NFL is to powerful and they’re not helping protect their players.

Read More

Garretson's Argumentative Analysis

528 Words | 3 Pages

Finally, the quality of counterargument expressed throughout Garretson’s essay, has also been effected by her biased stance on vegetarianism, because she has been unable to display and acknowledge opposing views in her piece. It is very important for one to present counterarguments in their writing because it shows that the writer is not narrow-minded, and instead, is fair by considering other perspectives. Additionally, the use of counterargument adds credibility to a writing and makes the arguments that one presents more believable and trustworthy. Since Garretson does not display or acknowledge any opposing views in her essay, her arguments lose a great deal of credibility. There are many different approaches that Garretson could have taken

Read More

Tom Tyler's Argumentative Analysis

286 Words | 2 Pages

In accordance with Tom Tyler's ideal of procedural justice criminal justice professionals should behave in a manner that leads to more trust and confidence in our judges, the courts, the criminal justice system, and the law while providing justice for the people. An example of this is the decisions pertaining to child custody and support in which would be willingly followed by both parents to create the most positive outcome for the parties separating; In other words, enabling both parents to adhere to court agreements concerning custody issues, child support, and visitation rights. This basic form of procedural of justice is often filled with problems and disputes that lead to one side not accepting the decisions of the of court; thus, leading

Read More

Sherman's Argumentative Analysis

883 Words | 4 Pages

Starting in Philadelphia on May 25th ,1787, fifty-five state delegates attended the Constitutional Convention. Their goal? To create a new government that would not succumb to the same faults of the Articles of Confederation. With the events leading into the American Revolution and the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation fresh on their minds, many of the delegates traveled to the Convention with their own conflicting agendas of what the American government should become. Today, many people agree that the Constitution should be interpreted with the intentions of the original framers in mind.

Read More

Seibert's Argumentative Analysis

414 Words | 2 Pages

In chapter seven, Seibert offers a suggestion to read the Joshua 6-11 account from the perspective of the Canaanites. This argument became a view changer for me and I find it helpful for reading scripture through a suffering lens, in spite of always reading from the viewpoint of the conquers. As an African American, who always had the privilege of reading African American history from the perspective of the slave, Seibert in this section suggest that all should read virtuous violence from the perspective of the suffering. It is important that when viewing scriptures of violence, one must first remember that those included are human. I find this argument by Seibert extremely helpful and transformative, because it will forever remind me that

Read More

Abrahms And Potter Argumentative Analysis

1619 Words | 7 Pages

and Potter analyze the motives behind indiscriminate violence. Abrahms and Potter contend that indiscriminate forms of violence carried out against general populations exist because leadership deficits promote civilian targeting. They claim that the incentives for indiscriminate violence are inversely related to their position in the organization. The lower the individual is in the chain of command, the more likely they are to carry out attacks against civilian targets. Terrorists are significantly more likely to gain advantages by attacking military targets rather than civilian.

Read More

Federal Sentencing: An Argumentative Analysis

442 Words | 2 Pages

From 1990 to 2010, the percentage of foreign-born individuals in the United States population has skyrocketed from 7.9% or (19,767,316 individuals) to 12.9% of the population (or 39,955,854 individuals), and has received attention from researchers seeking to examine the link between immigration and decisions made by government representatives and officials (Wu and D’Angelo, 2014, p. 58). In the article “Unwarranted Disparity in Federal Sentencing: Noncitizen Crime as a Social/Group Threat”, Jawjeong Wu and Jill M. D’Angelo broadened the scope of this field by being the first researchers to look into citizenship as a factor using multilevel analysis (Wu and D’Angelo, 2014, p. 59). In their study, Wu and D’Angelo (2014) found that cross-level

Read More

Rogerian Argumentative Analysis

561 Words | 3 Pages

Beatty understands the way the world works in retrospect to the events leading up to the current situation of their government. As a fireman you must know what you are doing and how it benefits your society. Beatty explains the reason that books are banned to Montag, and doing so helps us understand the most important factor in the story. You must not offend anyone whatsoever. To maintain peace you must cease from reading or writing anything that could slightly be taken out of context.

Read More

Hispanic Immigrants Assimilation

693 Words | 3 Pages

The color line and racial inequality are influent factors in the process. Italian, Polish, and Jewish may not be melted into the majority group when they first came to The Unite States, but they and their children at some point of their life will be assimilated by becoming white and the upward mobility will bring advantages. (Morrison, 1993,) but for people of color such as Hispanic population assimilation means downward mobility; assimilation takes a very different path. Due to the prevalence of negative stereotypes and prejudicial beliefs. Today’s Hispanic immigrants are perceived as poor, ignorant, unclean, illegal aliens, less intellectual and they are more likely to be associated to have a high rate of teenage pregnancies and be involved in criminal behaviors and drugs.

Read More

Parfit's Theory Of Argumentative

1085 Words | 5 Pages

Introduction It seems conceivable for an individual to go through “fission”. Maybe half of an individual’s brain can be kept alive and put in one body, and the other half of an individual’s brain kept alive and put in another body. Parfit envisions this happening to him, and wonders critically about what will happen to him. He proposes three possibilities: he does not survive; he survives as one of the two individuals; and he survives as both “in that he has two bodies and a mind that is divided” (Loux 375).

Read More

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Straight Line Assimilation

775 Words | 4 Pages

This specific theory is an alternative to straight line assimilation. It is a combination of straight line assimilation including the ethnic disadvantage model. It suggests that there are three possible paths of integration that the children of immigrants might undertake. Either upward mobility, downward mobility, or horizontal mobility. For instance, let’s take into consideration Pedro Flores.

Read More

More about Morenoff And Astor Argumentative Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document