More handpicked essays just for you.
Cruel and inhumane treatment in animal experimentation
Cruel and inhumane treatment in animal experimentation
Cruel and inhumane treatment in animal experimentation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In July of 2005, Secretary Chertoff announced a six-point agenda for the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) that would address the policies, operations and the structures for present and future threats to the United States (Department of Homeland Security, n.d). These new initiatives would provide a new structure for the Department of Homeland Security that would allow it to manage risk better. The purpose of the agenda was to strengthen the countries vulnerabilities to the increasing threats from terrorism, natural disasters, technological disasters and cyber threats. These initiatives would increase the countries overall preparedness for a national incident, provide security enhancements to the countries transportations system, strengthen
Changing Our Outlook of Animals During the Period of 1800 to 1910 Short Essay Concerning the period of 1800 to 1910, many movements were formed addressing the lives and suffering of animals. Such movements granted better welfare for animals as well as a sentient outlook towards them. Animal protectionists in the nineteenth century worked to create legislation that granted animals immediate legal protections, as well as large-scale public education efforts to explain the harm of cruelty to animals in terms of the animals’ suffering[1]. As stated by Pearson in the Cow and the Plow, animal suffering was simply one of many potential definitions of cruelty’s damages, and when judges and other legal interpreters read animal protection statutes,
Can one really determine a person’s character by their treatment of animals? In “The Call of the Wild” by Jack London, a dog named Buck is kidnapped from his life of luxury, and forced into the wild. Buck becomes a sled dog and is put through various owners, both responsible, and irresponsible. London conveys the theme that one can judge a person's character based on their treatment of animals as seen through Buck’s positive relationship with John Thorton, and his negative relationship with Hal, Charles, and Mercedes. One can judge a persons character based on their treatment of animals as seen through Buck’s positive relationship with John Thorton.
This essay will discuss the history of both animals and humans as subjects of biomedical research. It will also discuss how different ethical philosophies view the use of animals and humans as test subjects. It will aim to analyse how legislation in regards to biomedical research has evolved, analysing the existing arrangements and predict how the future of biomedical research will be shaped. Animals have been used as test subjects for biomedical research for over x years. The use of animal subjects has largely been largely successful in advancing scientific progress in the area of biomedical research.
The problem of animal abuse is not new, but neither are the laws that protect animals and those laws are as equally important to the resolving of the problem. Overtime laws became more strict, this shows that people have become more involved with the problem and have stopped some cases of animal abuse before they started, but sometimes it’s too late and that needs to stop together need to stop that from happening. As proclaimed in the text, “ People have experimented with animals for hundreds of years. But the practice did not become widespread until the late 1800’s” (Animal Experimentation).
Studies show that with all of the animal experimentation that has been done, most of them were inhumane, unreliable and had violated the Animal Welfare Act of 1966. This act ensures that animal care for research is a main priority. It is also required to have appropriate veterinary care, housing, feeding, handling, sanitation, ventilation, and sheltering. For some, animal experimentation is “supposed” to help human beings use certain products for their own benefit. What people do not realize is that these animals have rights and that their rights are being more than violated.
They also required that the animal received enough pain medication for the experiments unless, it would cause an interference with the test results (“Explanation of the Animal Welfare Act”). This proved to be unsuccessful due to thousands of animals going through pain in experiments each year. In 1976, an amendment was made to the act again in order to make laws on how the animals were transferred to and from each location (“Explanation of the Animal Welfare Act”). Finally in 1985, it became required to have oversight for experiments and to be able to justify the tests being done on the animals (“Explanation of the Animal Welfare Act”).
The animal rights movement gained momentum in the 1960s and 1970s, as progressively people became aware of the mistreatment of animals in laboratories, factories, and farms. In 1877 the American Human Association was established as the national umbrella organization for anti-cruelty groups in the United States and Canada (Woodger, 2013, p. 145). One of their top priorities was to "extending humane propaganda” and introduce “humane literature into schools,” (p. 145). Animal rights activists in Canada work to improve the lives of animals through education, legislation, and activism. They protest to end the use of animals in research and testing, to improve conditions for farm animals, and to protect wildlife.
In 1966 the Animal Welfare Act was signed in order to get control over the treatment of animals that are being researched on. This act requires animals to be registered when they are being researched on but there is a large flaw in this act. The act does not cover birds, rats and mice; roughly 95% of research is conducted on mice and rats (Animal testing 101). Animal testing is torture. A great example of how horrible animal testing is an experiment that occurred in 1969 on monkeys to test drug addiction.
These cruelty laws should be re-written to better protect the lives of innocent animals and the possible danger to other humans who might become a future victims of these people whose abuse often transcends to the abuse of people. The History of the
“‘Cause the government, as cares for the lives of such man as you, as haven’t half the pluck of curs, lets a man kill a dog how he likes”, (Dickens 139) is what could be said in the Victorian era and, even with laws against animal abuse, is what is believed by some people today. From jabbing dogs with pokers in the Victorian era, to throwing a cat off a third floor balcony last year, animal abuse has always been a problem. The worst part is, animal abuse reports grow each year. Not everyone believes that animals can feel pain and grief the way humans do. In the historical fiction novel, Oliver Twist by Charles Dickens, Dickens shows that people in the Victorian era could beat and even kill their animals if they wanted.
Researchers estimated over 26 million animals were used for scientific tests and commercial testing subject every year in the United States. Over the years animals were used to be tested on medical treatments, products for human uses, health care, and etc. The practice of researching on living animals has started since 500 BC. Opponents of this act say that it is cruel to experiment on animals, there are other methods available to replace the cruel act of experimenting on living animals, and that the human bodies and animal’s bodies are totally two different features and the research often yields irrelevant results. The federal Animal Welfare or AWA passed the animal testing act in 1966 and amended in 1970, 1976, and 1985.
Legislation prohibiting cruelty against animals originated in the English Parliament in 1822, and variations of this type of legislation proliferated over the next century, particularly in countries formerly under English colonial rule. A number of countries continue to have laws on prevention of cruelty to animals that date from early to mid-20th century, before the significant development and internationalization of the animal welfare movement. Animal cruelty legislation prohibits the most extreme, deliberate or willful forms of mistreatment of animals, imposing criminal sanctions for certain acts that constitute "cruelty to animals". This is in contrast to animal welfare legislation, which assumes that some conditions are unavoidable collateral
Many debilitating diseases and conditions have been cured and prevented using vaccinations that were tested on animals. For example, Emil von Behring performed an experiment on guinea pigs that helped form the vaccine for diphtheria (Soft Schools). The significance of this experiment helped von Behring earn a Nobel Prize in Physiology (Soft Schools). Following von Behring’s findings, Edgar Adrian used frogs to confirm the specific way that the brain sends signals to different parts of the body (Soft Schools). Advancements in the understanding of diabetes, tuberculosis, and polio, along with the formation of anesthetics all were successful with the help of animal testing (Soft Schools).
The contribution of animal testing is significance. A report from California Biomedical Research Association states that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals. For example Diabetics used to be the disaster to humans before the insulin was found. Frederick G. Banting solved this problem by doing
