CM conducted a CFT/Court hearing at the Jersey City Courthouse for Leandro Fontoura (Youth). In attendance were Jasmine Alexander (CM), Daniela Pacheco (parent), Leandro Fontoura (youth), Edna Davie (YES- Coordinator), Rate Maza (YES- Intern) and Lee Kennedy (MRSS- Crisis Intervention Specialist). The Strength and Needs Assessment was completed and the crisis plan was reviewed. Needs and strategies were discussed and family vision was reviewed.
3. Rationale: This is a very important part of the case brief. You must explain the gist of the court ruling, (i.e., why the court arrived at its holding). The Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal in err for lack of counsel. Parents are entitled to protection of their rights under IDEA; which includes the entitlement to prosecute on their own behalf claims under IDEA.
For over 70 years the homes off of Woodlawn Avenue have been known as Hathorn Court. However, the community came together on Saturday to change the name to Woodlawn Court. "Hathorn Court has always had a stigma about it because of the crime rate that was here. We had a problem bringing it back to where it needs to be," said Property Manager, Don Paul. On Saturday, the community held a block party and clean up day.
Predication: On 11/11/17, Asset Protection Manager (APM) Kristin Catucci contacted APM Jakub Orlando regarding Customer Service Associate (CSA) Anthony Stoddart who was suspected of taking money out of the register for personal benefit. Facts: On 11/14/17, APM Orlando reviewed CCTV footage along with POS electronic journal to confirm this allegation. CCTV footage reviled that CSA Stoddart took money from the bottom of the register and placed it into his pocket.
You Will Be The Judge Facts: The case involves a 12 year old child named Griffin Grimbly who told the teacher that he was beaten with a clothesline by his father Mr.Gimli. In court, the Mr.Gimli argued that he was devoted to Christian and was following the Biblical injunction on child rearing, “Spare the rod and spoil the child”, as well as arguing that s 43 of the criminal code gives parents the right to use “reasonable force” in disciplining their children. Issue: Is Mr. Grimbly is guilty of or not guilty of assault ? Held: Mr.Grimbly is guilty of assault.
The District Court denied the plaintiff’s claims, and the Court of Appeals affirmed the earlier decision. The Court of Appeals stated the non-English speaking students came
Petitioner, Triniti T. (“Student” or “Petitioner”) filed her initial request for due process hearing (“Beaumont I”) on February 24, 2014. In the request, Petitioner alleged that the District denied Student a free, appropriate public education (“FAPE”). A hearing was held on June 24-26, 2014 and a Decision following due process hearing (“Decision”) was issues on August 28, 2014. The Decision found that Petitioner had met her burden in proving that the District failed to provide Student with a FAPE in specific areas and the Petitioner was entitled various relief including, but not limited to specific prospective placement, services, assessments, training, devices/equipment for the remainder of the 2014-2015 school year; program development for the 2015-2016 school year, and reimbursement
The conduct of the defendant’s in the 1971 Washington Court of appeals case, State v. Williams, while neither advisable nor necessarily admirable, was justified given their valid concerns about losing possibly losing custody of their son if they sought medical help due to their Native American heritage. Walter Williams and Bernice Williams made the fateful decision to not take their 17-month old son, who was thought to only have minor tooth-ache, to the hospital due to concerns that such hospital visit would result in them losing custody of their son. Unfortunately, for the co-defendants, their son’s illness was much more severe than initially thought and their decision not to seek care resulted in both the son’s death and a manslaughter conviction
MILLERSBURG — Despite a plea for leniency expressed by the victim, a Sugarcreek man was unable to overcome a long history of criminal convictions and a bond violation when a Holmes County judge on Wednesday sentenced him to prison for making unwanted phone calls and threats to several members of a family over a period of months. David Lamar Schrock, 43, of 2578 State Route 39, previously pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to two counts of telephone harassment and one count of menacing by stalking. In exchange for his guilty plea, the state agreed to dismiss two additional counts of telephone harassment and three counts of menacing by stalking. The charges are made more serious because Schrock was convicted, in January 2016,
The Supreme Court of the United States Plaintiff: Keeble (Pomani's brother-in-law). Defendant: United States Legal Department (the attorney general, solicitor general, and deputy solicitor general) From: District Court of South Dakota. Law Firm: Chris and Luke Co. advocates.
Chief David L. Perry is the current Chief of Police at Florida State University (FSU), and formerly in Albany, GA and Clemson University. Chief Perry describes many situations that arise around a collegiate campus and what measures are being taken to ensure the safety of the FSU campus. The major emphasis throughout the presentation was on safety of the FSU campus. Early on in the presentation Chief Perry made the statement that a plentiful amount occurs behind the scenes that the students are unaware of.
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Under Arizona and First Amendment law, did the trial court correctly find that a comedian’s hateful rhetoric constituted fighting words and was thus not protected speech when at a comedy show he: (1) made derogatory references in regards to a politician’s heritage; (2) called for the killing of the politician’s family; (3) mentioned the politician’s name; and (4) repeated his language by posting on the politician’s social media pages? 2. Did the trial court correctly find that the comedian’s speech was a “true threat” and therefore unprotected by the First Amendment when he: (1) called for the beating of a politician; (2) lit a campaign poster on fire depicting the politician; and (3) caused the severe emotional distress of
In November 1978, Proposition 7 passed in California which created automatic appeals on death penalty cases, “cases in which the death penalty has been decreed are automatically reviewed by the California Supreme Court” (par. 19.). The automatic review created a system where every death sentence would be reviewed by the California Supreme Court. This is one cause of court delays in the appeal process. Scott Howe is a researcher at Chapman University School of law who investigated the severe backlog of cases to be heard by the courts. Howe observed that “death sentences have been generated in the trial courts at a much greater rate than they have been resolved on direct appeal” (1452).
Drew Britson Mrs. Neuberger Comp 2 March 2 2023 The One that got Away The beginning of the end for Robert started on June 13 1983 when he was roaming the streets of Anchorage looking for his next victim when he came across Cindy Paulson a prostitute who was working the streets. Cindy was a young 17 year old who went down a bad path and having to work in the bad parts of town just to survive.
THE JURY: Trial and Error in the American Courtroom by Stephen J. Adler is a significant book on reforming the jury system. Alder is the legal Editor at the Wall Street Journal and has done several interviews with lawyers, judges and legal experts in order to better understand the current justice system and to find out solutions to the system’s faults. Alder starts off with a story of how a woman named Maude was acquitted by the jury after charges was set on her for pistol whipping a man who had sewn up her horse's mouth for eating his hay. Alder explains “Maude's case is quintessentially American, and it reveals what we imagine and want our jury system to be. It shows the little guy speaking for all of us, justice handed up from the community, not
