ipl-logo

Trinity Western University Case Study

1777 Words8 Pages

This paper discusses the review of the Ontario Court of Appeal between Trinity Western University v. The Law Society of Upper Canada. The structure of this paper will begin with the facts of the case which includes both the Law Society of Upper Canada, the Divisional Court decision, and the conflicting issues of the case. The second portion discusses an analytical point of the case which focuses on the limitations clause of the Charter. In this paper, I will be demonstrating that the rights and freedoms in the Charter are not absolute.
- Facts of the case
Trinity Western University (TWU) is a private university in British Columbia that provides an education based on evangelical Christian principles. TWU’s education is to provide an underlying …show more content…

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms but only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law. They can be limited in order to protect other rights and important national values. The Charter itself has two mechanisms which preserve the power of Parliament and the legislatures to limit or override individual rights guaranteed by the Charter in the interest of public affair. Section 1 of the Charter is referred to as the limitations clause and is modelled based on European codes of civil rights. Unlike the Bill of Rights, the Charter states that no right is absolute. It is hard for Americans to understand this approach. How can you have rights, and then say the state can take them away? Yet, this is exactly s.1 of the Charter does. Moreover, s.1 of the Charter sets out a two-part test to determine whether the federal or provincial law can override a constitutional guarantee of protection within the Charter. “First, the federal or provincial statue’s limits on rights must be reasonable and prescribed by law. Second, the limits must be established, to the satisfaction of the presiding judge, to be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.” (Boyd Chapter 4) The limitations clause is reasonable in this case because the rights of TWU’s freedom of religion defined in the Charter collides with …show more content…

2(a) of the Charter is limited in that freedom of religion does not extend to a policy like the Covenant. LSUC recognizes that freedom of religion interferes with the rights and freedoms of others. One of the core reasons why the LSUC is entitled to limit TWU’s religious freedom is that the Section 4.2.3 of the Law Society Act (LSA) states that the LSUC “has a duty to protect the public interest.” (Ontario Court of Appeal, 2016: D3 (103)) The Divisional Court states that the TWU should not only meet the standards of competence but must also respect the public interest set out in the principles of s. 4.2 LSA. Hence the TWU’s Community Covenant strictly restricts the equality rights of LGBTQ members which are contrary to the public interest. It follows that one of the LSUC’s objective is to remove discriminatory barriers in the legal profession which includes religious affiliation, race, and gender. Thus the Divisional Court concludes that the LSUC is entitled to consider the impact of LGBTQ community and its decision refusing to accredit TWU’s proposed law school was reasonable. This indicates that freedom of religion is not absolute and that the competing rights of other individuals or groups must always be taken into

Show More
Related
628 Words | 3 Pages

After going through the state appellate court and the state supreme court Brandenburg appealed to the Supreme Court. 3. Questions of the Case Did the Ohio Criminal Syndicalism Statute violate Clarence Brandenburg’s First and Fourteenth Amendment rights? 4.

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

The laws established by the city wanted to protect the safety, welfare, and health of surrounding residents to keep the killing of animals away from the city’s boundaries. However, when passing three laws to prevent animal sacrifices the city was unknowingly unconstitutional. Justice Kennedy stated his opinion in court that the laws in question were enacted by officials who did not understand, failed to perceive, or chose to ignore the fact that their official actions violates the Nation’s essential commitment to religious freedom (Cornell University Law School, 2015).

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

Motlow State Community College does not offer a cafeteria for students at the Smyrna Center. Constructing a cafeteria at Motlow State Community College would be beneficial for everyone, including the staff and students. A cafeteria would offer convenience for students and staff, increase the attendance rate, and allow students to engage in social interactions with one another. Not only is cafeteria favorable for the Motlow State community, but it would multiply the revenue for the school. Predominantly, constructing a cafeteria will improve the Smyrna campus as a whole.

Read More
1910 Words | 8 Pages

This captures the difficulty of human nature, which includes both positive and negative tendencies toward individual rights and liberties. These are said to be fundamental to human nature and moral rights and must be preserved accordingly. Creating a society that values freedom of expression, individual liberty, and rights is critical, as it recognizes the difficulties of human behaviour. Achieving this balance creates a more equitable society that recognizes the issues within different types of human behaviour. The second constitutional claim is “2.1.2 The goal of building a national coalition of people who share these beliefs and who reflect the regional, cultural, and socio-economic diversity of Canada.”

Read More
1958 Words | 8 Pages

In particular, resolution of the question of whether facial neutrality will be dispositive under Smith will be of considerable significance. More importantly, though, Hialeah will now call on the Court to decide whether disadvantaging minority religious practices, like Santeria, is, in fact, an "unavoidable consequence" of democratic government. Hialeah, in other words, involves nothing short of the fate of free exercise” . The case advanced the development of the First Amendment, Free Clause. City Attorneys when addressing this case to the city council clearly stated “we cannot stop them from opening a church a church.

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

However, by excluding subversive advocacy and substantive due process in any case creates a problem in legal reasoning. Bork fails to realize that it is important for an individual to claim their right is violated in any circumstance under the Constitution, since he renders that procedural due process plays a more practical role over substantive due process. Subsequently, the Charter of Rights is intended to operate as a limitation upon the powers of the State. Bork’s judicial review is referring to the way Courts should be principled. In his view, if the judiciary is inconsistent with their theory of ruling of the majority, he claims the supremacy of Court will become “illegitimate” (1971).

Read More
1059 Words | 5 Pages

The Court even stated that “the courts do not hold a monopoly on the protection and promotion of rights and freedoms (R. v. Mills, 1999, para. 3).” Although this should not be taken as a full endorsement of coordinate interpretation, the Court’s decision in Mills shows that the idea of coordinate interpretation is not alien to the Canadian judiciary, and that it is capable of seeing the legislature as having its own valid interpretation of the

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

Over the years, our judicial system has changed quite dramatically. Our Supreme Court has gone from six judges (with two from Quebec) in 1875, to seven judges (1927), to a total of nine judges (with three from Quebec) in 1949 (Smith, 2015, p.130). That is quite a big change on its own. However, the Supreme Court of Canada’s role is one element of the judicial system that has had even more of a considerable development. The transformation of our Supreme Court all started in 1960 when Canada got introduced to the Bill of Rights (Stewart, 2015, Week Four).

Read More
991 Words | 4 Pages

Civic Reflection Issue 1- Change in Point of View The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a bill of rights which outlines and protects the basic rights and fundamental freedoms that all Canadians have. These include the fundamental freedoms, democratic rights, mobility rights, legal rights, equality rights, language rights, and Aboriginal and treaty rights. The Canadian Charter of Rights is extremely important to the citizens of Canada as it has given important meaning to the protection of our rights. It makes sure that minorities and vulnerable groups are protected through equality rights.

Read More
1219 Words | 5 Pages

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms first came into effect on April 17, 1982. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is one part of the Canadian Constitution, created in 1867. The Constitution is a set of laws containing the basic rules about how a country operates. The Charter sets out those rights and freedoms that Canadians believe are necessary in a free and democratic society. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is an effective tool to ensure and maintain a just society as it protects the innocence of people, protects and ensures past laws and states fundamental freedoms, all of which work to create a thriving society.

Read More
588 Words | 3 Pages

The opinions of Hudson Jr. and Collins are consistent with the viewpoints of this essay. Westboro Baptist Church may be a revolting group, but the First Amendment protects exactly these types of people. The Phelps family has the right to voice their opinions, and preventing them from doing so would be unconstitutional and only add another wrong to the equation. Another relevant text to this discussion is The Irony of Free Speech by Owen Fiss.

Read More
369 Words | 2 Pages

The constitution is the highest level of authority in Canada, every branch of the government is compelled to follow it; the judicial system is inclined to enforce it, the executive has to obey it, and only the government can approve its amendment- on varying levels dependant on the areas being amended. As times change so does the relevancy of articles within the constitution. I argue that the government should not be responsible alone in approving such changes. Since Canada is systematically run under the constitution, and is a democratically run Responsible Government, appropriate decision-making about its amendments should be carried out by the people through national referendum. The British North American Act of was established in 1867

Read More
1116 Words | 5 Pages

People should have the right to defend themselves judicially and should obviously have the right to religious

Read More
1346 Words | 6 Pages

In the United States, enmity towards Roman Catholics, Jews, Mormons, and other groups has been prevalent, intense, and long term. Over 40,000 complaints of religious discrimination have been filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission since Title VII of the

Read More
988 Words | 4 Pages

The constitutions did not make this distinction making all aspects of the right subject to limitations. The Kenyan and South African constitutions allow limitations if it is provided by law and can be reasonable and justifiable in a democratic society. This is a very broad limitation that can be extended and applied to many things. The Indian limitation clause, in contrast; provides the right subject to ‘public order, morality and health’. Morality as ground for limitation is very broad; as there is no universal definition of morality, anything may be justified on this ground.

Read More

More about Trinity Western University Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document