Thesis Statement:Trophy hunting should not be banned because the profits help countries get security to cut down on poaching and hunters kill trophy animals that negatively impact the environment.
Body Paragraph #1
Topic Sentence: Trophy hunting has positively impacted the environment from its 100,00’s of dollars in costs.
Supporting Evidence #1: “The killing of two old white rhino in 2012 paid for 49% of a $377,000 high-tech security fence along a border”(Emslie,Knight, 2016)
Explanation: Since the hunters had to pay a hefty price to kill the rhino, the funds went to a good investment. This security fence should hopefully cut poaching in this area in half according to wildlife management officers in this area.
Supporting Evidence #2:
…show more content…
To reach food, elephants regularly break branches, uproot bushes and push down whole trees” Helliker, K. (2015, 12/21). An unlikely boom in trophy hunting. Wall Street Journal Retrieved from http://sks.sirs.com.
Explanation: Elephants are a big problem to the environment because they destroy trees and other parts of nature to get food. They are targeted to make our environment better, but they should not be fully taken out, but we still have a few for resources like ivory or their skin for clothing and household items.
Supporting Evidence #2: “Moose are a big and powerful cause to the environment because they use the inner parts of their heads to rub on trees and mark their territory” Emslie, R., & Knight, M. (2016, 03/19). Hunting is crucial to conservation. The Independent Retrieved from http://sks.sirs.com.
Explanation: Moose are a problem in our environment because they rub and destroy trees and can break them in half or kill them. Moose are very big and powerful and should have a limited population.
Transition Sentence: Although, some may argue that hunting is a positive part of the world, some think it is negative.