ipl-logo

Truman Choice To Drop The Nuclear Bomb Essay

1861 Words8 Pages

During the end of World War II, few analyzed Truman 's choice to drop the nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Most Americans saw the unmistakable considering: the atomic bombings went on the war to an all the more important end. They didn 't have an issue with more than one hundred thousand of the adversary being executed. Taking everything in a record, the Japanese got America, and not the substitute way. In later years, regardless, particular have started to look at the good perspective of "Truman was sparing lives," driving hypotheses of their own. Regardless, when one dismembers the issue with great thought as to the yielded consequences of the nuclear bombings and complexities these outcomes and conceivable unmistakable decisions for utilizing said bombs, the line in the midst of truth and fiction starts to remove. Truman 's choice to employ the nuclear …show more content…

The Japanese prepared force was by then setting up its ordinary individuals to battle with honed bamboo posts. As showed by samurai convention, there was not any more fundamental approach to manage administer kick the can than to do in that most extreme for Japan and the head, and the favorite subjects were particularly fabricated to take this technique for speculation to heart. Utilizing honed pikes the Japanese could without a great deal of a stretches keep a military government from being impacting in those towns that the U. S. got. Further, and amazingly more basic was the engineering of red, white adolescents to be "Sherman floor covers." Japanese young people were to be strapped with TNT and hurl themselves under American tanks, in this way kicking the dish in the most sensible way that could be open - by butchering the enemy. It can be seen that in any event the same number of standard nationals would have kicked the can as troopers, going on the holes some spot around 200,000 to four million Japanese dead, near the 50,000 to one million American dead, totaling 250,000 to five million

Show More
Related
1394 Words | 6 Pages

Walker does not just take the reader on a tour of the decision-making process of President Truman and shows what made him to order the use of Atomic bombs on Japan, but he also provide an exploration of the historical situation that prompted the decision. He also examines the viewpoint of the Japanese, not only regarding the impact of the bombings on their ultimate decision to surrender, but also how their Allies called for an unconditional surrender. This call could possibly have led to the Japanese Emperor, Hirohito, being tried on counts of war crimes, which may have possibly made the Japanese to be reluctant on surrendering even in light of a crushing defeat (Huczko). Samuel Walker also provides useful insights into contribution made by the decision to use Atomic weapons on Japanese decision to surrender.

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

Wilson D. Miscamble offers a clear and concise argument in favor of the use of the atomic bombs in The Most Controversial Decision: Truman, the Atomic Bombs and the Defeat of Japan. The title itself suggests at his main argument that the use of the atomic was necessary as a tool to defeat Japan. This argument will be reiterated many times throughout the book, with much evidence borrowed from other scholars who are on his side in this very popular debate. Miscamble takes much of the book to defend not only the bombings but also Truman’s role in them. By painting him as a passive politician who inherited the decisions that were to be made, the blame on Truman is lessened.

Read More
719 Words | 3 Pages

The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Harry S. Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb is one of the biggest and deadliest controversial turning points in history. America’s president, Truman, decided that on August 6, 1945, the atomic bomb would be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end World War II. President Truman’s choice to drop the bomb on Japan was considered one of the most debatable turning points. The settlement to drop this bomb was a wrong decision because this bomb killed more than 70,000 innocent people with 10,000’s dying later. Also, bombing a country that was going to surrender in a few months would not be necessary, and last but not least, the atomic bomb could give ideas for the world to start nuclear warfare.

Read More
856 Words | 4 Pages

This shows that not just Truman thought it would save American lives and end the war quickier. In document H, which is a WWII soldiers opinion, it says “only a few weeks before Hiroshima, 123,000 Japanese and Americans killed each other. War is immoral. War is cruel.” If we hadn't dropped the atomic bomb more would be dead and that would affect the world as we know it like, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, the new population from 1941-1946 (time of war) dropped so more people were dying than being born then if one million more died our population would of dropped even more and there wouldn’t be enough men to repopulate, so if we didn’t

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

“Lewis estimates that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to the extent that it induced Japanese surrender, saved the lives of roughly 30 million people” (Dr. Daniel McIntosh). In the press release announcing the dropping of the atomic bomb Truman made a statement that would strongly support the dropping of the bomb. He states, “We have used it to shorten the agony of the war, in order to save the lives of thousands of young Americans.” World War 2 was an agonizing war that America helped. On Top of saving American lives, lives of all nationalities were saved with the end of the

Read More
630 Words | 3 Pages

With this bomb we have added a new and revolutionary increase in destruction to supplement the growing power of our armed forces. In their present form these bombs are now in production and even more powerful forms are in development.” (Truman 1) By educating the audience, the audience can understand and have more knowledge about why the dropping of the atomic bomb was necessary for society and other countries. By stating repetition and tone, Truman can back up his claim that the atomic bomb saved more lives and shortened the

Read More
1106 Words | 5 Pages

This is an event many Americans felt was necessary to end the war with a country that would fight till death to bring honor. However, many Japanese people felt this was a needless war crime that resulted in deaths of innocent civilians. It is much easier for Americans to relay this event as a factual occurrence, but to those still feeling and have felt the

Read More
650 Words | 3 Pages

Also, Robert Ferrel argued “Truman walked carefully around to Stalin*, who had stood up and was preparing to leave the hall and told about the test explosion of a nuclear bomb.” (Doc. F) This shows that

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.

Read More
1838 Words | 8 Pages

Imagine that there is a decision to be made to launch the atomic bomb or not. The bomb was launched but was it justified? Years ago during WWll, a scientist Albert Einstein sent a letter to the president. It said that Germany was creating a bomb that would cause major destruction and the United States had to make one as well. Scientists started making the bomb and it became the Project Manhattan.

Read More
1134 Words | 5 Pages

The United States was worried about the Soviet Union stepping in and helping the fight against Japan; The United States wanted to deal with Japan on its own and not have other nations' opinions conflict with them. President Truman used this as one of his justifications for wanting to end the war so quickly with these bombs. Dropping these bombs, however, set a precedent for nuclear warfare. "Szilard was one of the main authors of the Franck Report in June 1945. This report warned that even if the a-bomb helped save lives in this war, the a-bomb's use could lead to a nuclear arms race and, possibly, a nuclear war that would take far more lives than however many might be saved in the current war."

Read More
804 Words | 4 Pages

“The entire Japanese problem has been magnified out of its true proportion largely due to the physical characteristics of the people” (Martin 31). The Japanese didn’t resist being kicked because they felt like if they complied to prove their allegiance (Sandler 45). The Americans betrayed them out of fear. It was fear that drove the

Read More
1523 Words | 7 Pages

Thesis statement: Though many speculate that the act of dropping the atomic bomb on Japan (Hiroshima and Nagasaki) while not doing so on Europe (Germany and Italy) was racially motivated, racism played little to no role in these bombings. The United States of America and her allies were willing to end World War II at any cost, had the atomic bombs been available they would have been deployed in Europe. In the 1940’s there is no doubt that the United States of America was engulfed by mass anti-Japanese hysteria which inevitably bled over into America’s foreign policy. During this period Japanese people living in both Japan and the United States of America were seen as less that human.

Read More
863 Words | 4 Pages

Theoretically of course, what if a country was to develop a weapon strong enough to completely disintegrate cities and all the people living in it? Coincidently, the United states discovered a bomb that did exactly that and ended up thrusting the world into a new era of weaponized technology towards the end of World War II. Countries from this point on became wary of opposing the United States, aware of the power they possessed, especially since the US had already used this weapon on Japan to end the war.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

President Truman was treating people even worst by putting them through the torture of the bomb and the resulting effects of the bomb. Time became a major factor into the decision, and dropping the bomb was a result of that fear. On the other side of the argument, the Japanese did bomb Pearl Harbor which was the catalyst that got America involved in the first place. We as a country should not need to compromise with the nation who started the battle.

Read More

More about Truman Choice To Drop The Nuclear Bomb Essay

Related Topics

Open Document