ipl-logo

Trump's Immigration Order-Shame On You Mr President Analysis

505 Words3 Pages

Not long ago, Donald Trump became the 45th President of the United States in which he decided to make an executive order on immigration, but that did not please the people. Michael A Cohen, author of the article ‘‘Trump’s immigration order - Shame on you, Mr. President’’ published on Boston Globe, tells of this order the president posed. The purpose of article is to persuade his audience, citizens of the United States, that Trump’s decision to ban certain races from entering the US is in American. He persuades his audience with an appeal to pathos, logos that Trump’s executive order on immigration should be taken down. First, Cohen persuades his audience to sympathize and support immigrants through an appeal to pathos. For example, the author …show more content…

For example, the author tells key points, specifically which immigrants are not allowed to enter. He targets not only seven countries, but also people with “ dual citizens and even green card holders” (Cohen). The author speaks how considerably unfair the executive order is as it limits and blocks many people from entering. Americans with family from around the world realize that they would not be able to enter because either they have a dual citizenship or a green card. The green card does not make sense because they are people that have already gone through lots of challenges to have a residency. Trump does not realize the amount of damage that this can do especially with the amount of hate the audience may feel after reading this article. Moreover, as the author discuss trump’s action, he criticizes his actions as well. For example, he contradicts Trump’s beliefs by saying that “Trump likes to claim that under the current refugee resettlement rules we don’t know who is coming into the country. That is a lie” (Cohen). The author feels a need to criticize Trumps as many have done since before he became president. It seems as if it is his strategy to appeal to the people. It is also as if he tells the audience, he is on their side, all for the people. Overall, through Cohen use of an appeal to pathos and logos, he achieves convincing his audience that Trump’s executive order on immigration should be taken

Show More
Related
686 Words | 3 Pages

“Unfortunately, Mr. Trump is not interested in resolving a difficult problem if he can exploit it for political gain” This statement is delivered without any evidence or warrant build their logos. In addition, there is a lack of conciliatory language that impacts the tone and makes it seems like it is a fact while is actually a judgment they made. This impacts the logos and ethos and generates an ineffective and unsound argument. There is also a play on pathos in this statement created from the diction choice of “difficult problem” and “exploit”. Both of these emphasize mood but have a negative impact on pathos because they have a negative

Read More
927 Words | 4 Pages

He first sets the stage of the article by mentioning the bad behavior of Barack Obama for instituting this program. There are passive aggressive comments throughout the essay, mentioning the negative results that come with DACA. Wilcox mentions the relationship the United States has with Mexico, strengthening his own argument. Lastly, Wilcox strengthens his argument by mentioning how DACA affects the social and economic statues in the United States. In the article taxpayers are upset about using their money to support uneducated minors, in which their money could have been going towards American youth (CITATION).

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

“..Republican front-runner businessman Donald Trump, says he’ll undo Obama 's executive orders on immigration,” Article Two Sisters Two Americas by Brooke Ross states on page 11 in the New York Times Upfront April 4, 2016 edition. This has sparked outrage among people who know that most of the immigrants are good people who are trying to flee from violence that threatens to tear apart their lives. Brooke Ross helps people understand what life is like for families with a mixed-status and what we need to do about illegal immigration in her article Two Sisters Two Americas. By showing both sides of the big Democrat v Republican fight on what should be done about illegal immigration she lets people come to their own conclusions. The evidence however is firmly in favor of helping the immigrants by offering a path to

Read More
324 Words | 2 Pages

Response to “Our Fear of Immigrants” In “Our Fear of Immigrants” Jeremy Adam Smith takes a neutral stance on the immigration and anti-immigration argument. Smith begins by telling the story of a 4th grade class at Jefferson Elementary School in Berkeley, California who try to fight back against immigration laws after a classmate of theirs was deported back to his home country. Smith then goes on to compare the 4th graders to the adults of their town who fight for stronger immigration laws asking his readers what qualities the children possess that the rest of the citizens do not to make them react so differently.

Read More
635 Words | 3 Pages

Trump appeals to people with opposing viewpoints by using inclusive words and keeping the focus off of himself. It is not the things Trump will do, but it is the things that we, who “share one heart, one home, and one glorious destiny,” will

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

In the wake of Trump’s recent attempts to ban Muslim from entering the U.S, the nation has reacted with sympathy toward asylum-seekers that have been undoubtedly endangered by Trump’s order. An article by Thomas Reese supports this by agreeing that asylum seekers were endangered by the recent executive order. The article “Asylum seekers endangered by Trump’s executive order” by Thomas Reese, talks about the wall and the attention that the media has given to it, especially with Trump and Mexico’s president debate on who’s to pay the wall. The author says that “there is nothing intrinsically wrong with a wall or other physical barriers at the border.”

Read More
1296 Words | 6 Pages

One specific piece of information that author used in this section for logos was “Any newcomer represents a threat to the person who has power” (Smith 753). By using logos, the author was able to branch off and provide more information about why immigrants are perceived as a threat, allowing for his argument to improve. In addition to providing factual evidence within the text, Jeremy Smith gives the reader an emotional point of view, ethos. The author had not used a sufficient amount of pathos within this section; however, he had a few statements that appealed to the emotions. Within the article on page 754, he writes, “Horror over tens of thousands of children crossing the border without their parents transmutes into fear and repulsion, because many native-born Americans despair of being unable to help them.”

Read More
439 Words | 2 Pages

Immigration Restrictions is one of the many controversial subjects debated amongst American politics and society. The struggle and ideology for political, social, economic, and opportunity equality between varying races often includes the idea that humans can be subdivided into distinct groups that are different due to their social behavior and their innate capacities as well as the idea that they can be ranked as inferior or superior. This has been underlying and controversial for many years. Two opposing mindsets clashing over whether immigration restrictions should be created and whether or not there should be strict limitations holds relevance in our modern-day politics and society.

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

In the article “Our Fear of Immigrants” written by Jeremy Smith the article focuses on justice, education, economics, and what’s going on around us. Smith’ purpose in the article is to inform Americans about prejudice, discrimination, and the fear of immigrants that Americans have of foreigners coming to the United States. Smith used pathos, logos, and ethos by trying to get the readers to understand that “when shaping immigration policy, we should be holding in the front of our minds that we’re talking about real families, real kids, who have dreams hopes and incredible stories.” Smith wanted to the reader’s attention to show how the immigration policy can affect the people around us as well as children. I agree with immigration policy only to a certain extent however, I don’t agree with them deporting children and families away from the U.S. for no reason at all I feel like it should be only certain boundary’s that they must cross before being deported.

Read More
1302 Words | 6 Pages

These strategies work on the rhetorical appeals ethos and pathos. Exemplification appeals to pathos by making the audience feel sympathy for the immigrants for what they give up, and authority figures appeal to ethos by giving credibility to an expert, by supporting the argument through strong facts. In this essay, I plan to explore how these rhetorical strategies act on their respective appeals, how this is used to strengthen the Suarez-Orozco’s argument to persuade their audience, as well as explore other sources that may support this claim. One of the key strategies used by the Suarez-Orozcos, was the use of exemplification. An assumption they make is that their audience is a group of Americans who haven’t heard the stories of immigrants and the risks they take, but instead just assume they know the story.

Read More
226 Words | 1 Pages

Pathos and Ethos Ever since the terror attack that occurred on September 11, 2001, United States of America put a major stop on these refugees flying from their home countries and taking refuge in the United States. United States, ever since the incident that struck our American hearts with sadness then turned into anger, the distraught Americans declared “war on terror”. This war made any refugee coming from these wars torn countries to apply to be able to come into the country and made the process lengthy to get pass the Homeland Security. Donald Trump, our president, a successful businessman, and television personality, has come out as an advocate of rejecting all these refugees until the “war on terror” is over. This reform, proposed by

Read More
226 Words | 1 Pages

Many thinks, the US is a place full of oppertunities, a better life, jobs, innovation, but since, Donald Trump became the president of America , it is become hell for immigrants. The feeling of nationalism have been emerged by the speeches of Trump. In his campaign, Trump, always said about 'America first ' and 'We make America great again ', and always said the immigrants are wiping the jobs of American people. Hates crimes have been increased, since the Indian engineer Srinivas had been allegedly shot dead by a former US navy man, yelling ' get out of my country '.

Read More
242 Words | 1 Pages

The central idea of the readings is to explain why illegal immigrant 's can 't afford a good life or a better life in America. One important detail that supports this idea is that "many immigrants who entered the U.S. unlawfully find it difficult to afford a college education". Finally, the article shows that immigrants are trying to get help for college from the Congress but they are unsuccessful because Congress would have to forgive all the illegal immigrants that are in America and the ones that are coming in. This has become a problem for many illegal immigrant and college students that are immigrants . Because of this, many of the cant afford college or a job .

Read More
950 Words | 4 Pages

In the ever changing world of politics, the effect of political change on citizens is often overwhelming. In a Time’s article called “The Silver Lining of Donald Trump’s Refugee Ban”, Qasim Rashid explains how Trump’s refugee ban has only increased support for American Muslims while a large number of people would only look at the negative side of the ban. Although Rashid is firmly against Trump’s Muslim ban, he uses a very effective sarcastic tone with a repetitive set of words such as “I thank him [Donald Trump]” (Rashid, 2017) to convey his message to the reader. However, it is evident that the author is very aggressive and tense about the subject. Rashid intended to show a positive side to Trump’s refugee ban and expose Trump’s foolish ideology which was presented successfully to the reader.

Read More
2047 Words | 9 Pages

In my paper, I will analyse Donald Trump’s political activities before and after the election to get an objective viewpoint of America’s President. We’ll start off with the history of Trump, both personal and political, to see whether there was some sort of significant development over the years indicating a tendency towards ‘good or evil’. Next, we will take a look at what Donald Trump promised to do – the wall, lowering taxes and repealing Obamacare to name a few – and evaluate if he managed to keep his election pledges. This success rate is a major factor in definitively assessing Trump’s influence on America.

Read More

More about Trump's Immigration Order-Shame On You Mr President Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document