ipl-logo

Two Points Of Moral Relativism

704 Words3 Pages

Alka Pal Intro to Ethics Instructor- Dr. Mark Journal- 2 (Moral Relativism) February 19, 2018 Ethical Relativism, what is right and wrong in overall opinion among the morality? It differs from religion, cultures, tradition, and societies viewpoint. relativist means belief, idea, proposition, claim, etc. and it’s never good, or bad, true, or false, or right or wrong. At whatever rate, moral relativism might imply that our morals have reformed, that they have changed over time, and that they are not absolute. There are two points of moral Relativism firstly, its consents for the wide diversity of the culture and practice. It also allows explaining morality of the culture, understanding, knowledge, and modern change in society. Second, ethical …show more content…

As so far whatever and in whichever religion, culture, the tradition we believe is true. In every situation, we all look different way, and the knowledge of being right or wrong never applies to moral beliefs. Cultural moral relativism, it varies from culture to culture, all cultures are equally important, and there is not a single culture which whom we can say is better than any other. And it depends on that finally there is no standard of good or bad. So, every decision regarding right and wrong is the result of society. Any estimation on ethics and morality is subject to the cultural viewpoint of each person. Finally, this means that any moral or ethical system cannot be considered actual right and wrong. There are four consequences of moral relativism. Firstly, Cross-Cultural judgment as meaningless. It simply means that we cannot say Buddhism cultural is wrong or Christian cultural is wrong, we cannot even say that slavery was bad around hundred years ago it’s was just acceptable at that time. “we would not be able to either condemn or praise practices alien to our own culture. Our circle of moral judgment would be limited to those acts, beliefs, and rules within our own culture. We could certainly pass judgment on other practices, but our judgment would be objectively meaningless.” (page #

Show More
Related
308 Words | 2 Pages

To better explain, moral relativism states that moral judgments are true or false, but “only relative to some particular standpoint

Read More
517 Words | 3 Pages

Ethical relativism proposes that there are no universal principles of morality; rather, moral principles are unique to and determined by a society’s culture. Both Pellegrino and Macklin challenge the theory of ethical relativism in their own respective papers by arguing that there are universal moral principles in healthcare. I concur with Pellegrino and Macklin’s assessment of ethical relativism, as I have two arguments against the applicability of ethical relativism in healthcare: First, like both Pellegrino and Macklin, I acknowledge that there are universal principles of morality in medicine. Second, I find fault with the premise of the theory of ethical relativism. When exploring ethics in healthcare across the world, Macklin examined

Read More
1021 Words | 5 Pages

This is the beginning of Bloom’s analysis and the conclusions drawn from it are important stern indictments of American society. While Bloom does create a memorable and condemning critique of American society, some of the conclusions are not strongly connected to moral relativism. Bloom begins by stating that almost all university students he has encountered are moral relativists (Bloom 25). These students are not willing to rank cultural norms, believe that different cultures are equal and above judgment. These students have been conditioned by the liberal democratic education to believe their prepositions are just theirs and are a manifestation of the time and place they

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

Rachels gives the argument that just because one thing is acceptable in one culture does not always mean it was right or correct. Who could say that the tribes who ate the dead did it for virtuous reasons? Even Benedict argues that it is not so much what is right but what is common that seems to be acceptable. If morality was dependent on culture, it would not give us the right to criticize others. Rachels gives the example of the genocide of Jews.

Read More
1286 Words | 6 Pages

Relativism suggests that moral values and duties are contingent upon individual preferences or societal norms, leading to a subjective understanding of morality. However, Kant's theory overcomes this challenge by grounding morality in reason. According to Kant, moral principles are not arbitrary or culturally determined; they are derived from rationality and hold universal validity. By anchoring morality in reason, Kant establishes a foundation for ethical principles that transcend personal biases, cultural differences, and changing societal norms. This allows for the pursuit of objective and universal moral truths, fostering a more stable and consistent ethical framework.

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction Ethics plays a central role in shaping the direction that different societies take. Primarily, societies fashion the governing norms based on predefined sets of ethical standards that act as guidelines. Nevertheless, the pretexts used in developing these norms vary from one society to another, thereby creating a conflict in the level of objectivity of each premise. Argument Against Cultural Relativism

Read More
1240 Words | 5 Pages

This is evidence that moral values are universal and relative to an individual. Ethical objectivism has an aspect of universality of moral values and rules whereas ethical relativism confines moral values to the individuals and the

Read More
590 Words | 3 Pages

The three ethical perspectives are relativism, emotivism and ethical egoism. Relativism is something that everyone has, it can be as small as thinking American football is better than soccer or as extreme as being part of a cult. It’s what you believe is right because you were raised thinking that way. The problem comes when you move out to a different place away from what you know and have to deal with different kinds of people. What you think is right might be wrong to someone else because they were raised differently than you.

Read More
1385 Words | 6 Pages

Evaluating the morality within ourselves they evaluate morality on the principle of what is wrong or right. As equally

Read More
222 Words | 1 Pages

Megan Ferrell, I agree that relative ethics are the actions or beliefs considered to be ethical by a religion or culture. Relative ethics supports the view that the truth of moral principles is relative to each individual (Gowans, 2015). Relativism pertains to how people should regard or behave toward others that they may morally disagree, it is the idea that what we consider right or wrong ethically depends on the society and their considerations (Gowans, 2015). Peoples thoughts about ethical relativism varies widely even though philosophers appear to be critical of ethical relativism. Ethical relativism is connected with a normal position about how we should think or act toward those with disagree and that we should tolerate (Gowans, 2015).

Read More
1057 Words | 5 Pages

Therefore, moral judgements are not judgements of reason.” On this basis it seems incredibly difficult to argue that morals are scientific. Another flaw in this absolutist approach is that it doesn’t allow for cultural diversity. Arguably, the upholstering of basic human rights is more important than cultural values.

Read More
1070 Words | 5 Pages

In this prompt the argument that Morality exists is irrelevant, contrary to our thoughts and beliefs. Everyone follows a set of moral rules. Ethical relativists disagree with this belief because, they believe that morals are distinctive from each individual culture. These relativists as described are mixing up moral and cultural distinctions, or are simply not willing to completely understanding the cultures they are standing up for. There are two different types of relativism Ethical, and Cultural, that rely upon the argument of cultural differences, which have flaws that make the argument unsound.

Read More
2607 Words | 11 Pages

(Luco, Week 3 Notes, p.9) Cultural Relativism is simply a combination of the following three theses: 1. The only criterion of moral truth or falsehood is the moral code of a cultural group. 2. A moral claim is true, relative to a culture’s moral code, if and only if the claim is generally accepted within that cultural

Read More
1851 Words | 8 Pages

As human beings, we generally follow a thinking pattern that first involves developing our own opinions, then relating those opinions to the opinions of others. We often do this subconsciously; conscientious of what others believe, how they define certain actions, traits, and morals, and how their view towards what is just and unjust relates to our own. This fundamental thought process is the foundation of the philosophy of relativism. To the common person, the term relativism encompasses a philosophy that states that what is right and what is wrong is defined based on context, and situation.

Read More
929 Words | 4 Pages

Ethics and Religion The human views on ethics are greatly influenced by certain beliefs, such as religion or philosophical ideas. Philosophy and religion are similar in this sense; they both are morally influential. However, if a person did not have such views, he/she is still capable of having good morals. Though religion is very impacting in many people’s ethical standings, and a majority of human morality is derived from some belief in religion or supported by philosophical reasoning, it is not the only way a person can be moral.

Read More

More about Two Points Of Moral Relativism

Open Document