More handpicked essays just for you.
Alexander the greats impacts on the modern world
Alexander the greats impacts on the modern world
“Alexander the Great: Two Contrasting Views”
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Alexander killed an estimated of 100,000 enemy soldiers, and innocent civilians throughout his rein. (Doc. E). He killed all these people just because he wanted more land to gain more power. Most of these people did nothing to Alexander and had no affect on his life except they were an obstacle in the way of him gaining more power. Also Alexander killed a full army in East India because he saw a major opportunity to take control of land from one of the biggest empires.
Throughout history, there has been great military leaders come and go. Although, one of the most well-known conquerors is Alexander the Great. Many people thought he was a good leader and a good king. However, the people he conquered think otherwise. The people who supported him say he was compassionate towards others.
He was not great because he didn’t show concern for others, leadership, or intelligence. Alexander the Great was not the best because of his mass amounts of murder, not much care for his soldiers, and his poor ability to lead. The first reason Alexander the Great is not amazing because of the mass amount of murder he committed. One example is during the battle at Tyre, once Alexander’s army broke into the city they went on a ferocious killing spree (Doc C). Alexander had ordered anyone that was not inside the temple to be slain and he killed seven thousand Tyrians.
Despite Alexander not being politically great, society remembers him as great because of his military prowess
Alexander the Great was not great because of his disrespect for others. His Greek officers left him for a village of Hindu Kush people ( Doc F). This demonstrates that if Alexander was so great then why would his officers just leave him unless he did something that made them feel disrespected or feel uncomfortable. Alexander killed trained elephants
(Green, document C). Alexander may have just destroyed a city for his empire, but he showed concern by sparing the lives of those who took refuge. This proves that Alexander shows concern because the least he could do in the situation was make sure the victims were okay, and he did that. He spared the lives of the victims who took refuge. Clearly, there are reasons Alexander could be considered not great, but he shows outstanding qualities that prove
He spread Greek culture around the world and united the great Persian empire. Alexander created many cities, including Alexandria. These were bustling cities during his rule. Alexander was very effective because he was able to blend two cultures, had a great military, and gained the trust of the people.
Another reason why he was a villain because he killed members of his family so that he would become the ultimate successor to the throne. This should never be how a king becomes the ruler of his kingdom, ever. Even though I believe that Alexander the Great is a villain, others may think he was a hero. They may think that because he had conquered so many other nations.
Alexander was not great I think that Alexander was not great. In my opinion Alexander was not very great at all. He may have had some pretty amazing accomplishments but that does not mean he was great at what he does or how he did it and it for sure does not mean he was a great person by any means. The evidence that I will be using is Alexander 's Empire, The Destruction of Tyre, and Alexander 's Legacy.
Alexander the Great built an empire by stealing land from blameless people from weaker armies. Alexander was not a hero, but a terrible dreaded villain; Alexander the not so great. He was a villain because of his superstitions, immaturity in battle, and the sheer quantities of conquered land and killed enemies. Alexander was a really bad person, a villain. Alexander is not great because he killed one of his soldiers for luck.
Alexander the Great was a villain because he was very Reckless. Alexander had heavy consumption of alcohol. This caused him to be very drunk. When you 're Drunk you make terrible decisions. “Alexander spurned the over consumption of alcohol early on in his life.
Alexander the Great was a great military leader, but that doesn’t mean that he was a very good person. His reputation as a strategist, leader, and king spread with each of his conquest, but so did his reputation as a ruthless and merciless conqueror. He crushed rebellions, transversed a thousand miles, and even took down the once powerful Persia. Sure he was great, but was he great for being good.
Alexander The Great’s title of “The Great” was not an exaggeration. To earn the title of “The Great”, you must've done some extremely good things as your reign as a king, queen, or emperor. Alexander The Great did many great and powerful things during his lifetime. He established an extremely powerful military, and he knew how to strategically conquer land, and he was interested in turning this conquered land into powerful areas.
Alexander the Great is portrayed as a legendary conqueror and military leader in Greek-influenced Western history books but his legacy looks very different from a Persian perspective. Anyone who would visit Persia nowadays would hear about or probably see the Persepolis and would hear that it was built by Darius the great, embellished by his son Xerxes, and destroyed by Alexander (who isn’t so great in the eyes of a Persian). If you have read any western books you would have understood that Alexander was a great military general and was the man who brought the Persian Empire to its knees, Alexander is seen as great to people who have read western books but is considered far from being great from a Persian’s view for several reasons, one of
The Cask of Amontillado by Edgar Allan Poe is about a vengeful, manipulative person named Montresor who is plotting to take the life of his friend Fortunato. This story is good for different reasons, one being the plot construction that hooks the reader from the beginning. Another is the three different types of irony he uses: verbal irony, dramatic irony, and situational irony. Edgar Allan Poe has a way of writing that pulls the reader in from the beginning. The first few lines of the story “The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could, but when he ventured upon insult I vowed my revenge.”
