More handpicked essays just for you.
Alexander the great a hero or a villain
Alexander the great a hero or a villain
Short note on Alexander the great
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Alexander the great a hero or a villain
He then set off and conquered Egypt, the Persian Empire, and won a hard battle against India before his troops forced him to return home. Alexander then died at the age of 32. Most people see Alexander as Great because he conquered a lot of land, built a massive empire, and was a military genius, but Alexander was not so great. Alexander the Great did not deserve his title as Great because he gained his power by fear, killed innocent
Throughout history, there has been great military leaders come and go. Although, one of the most well-known conquerors is Alexander the Great. Many people thought he was a good leader and a good king. However, the people he conquered think otherwise. The people who supported him say he was compassionate towards others.
Did you know that Alexander the Great was one of the greatest conquers? Alexander was born in 358 B.C. and he lived in a kingdom in Greece called Macedonia. Alexander was the son of the King Phillip II, and Alexander became king. During his life, did Alexander show enough leadership, courage, and concern for others to be considered great? By these measures, Alexander was great for at least three reasons: military genius, inspiring leader, and spread of Greek cultures.
This story truly shows how technical Alexanders strategies were. He found the perfect time and place to go through with his plans making sure he would succeed and he always did. A remarkable leader should be able to get his army out of sticky situation as Alexander did here. Another example of Alexander using his brainpower to succeed is this map that shows the routs he and his army took. It also exhibits the few battles fought by Alexander and the massive amount of territory he gained (Doc A).
Alexander would have been a hero would he have lived twice his age. Plutarch notes that Alexander tamed Bucephalus a horse that Philoneicus gave his father as a present by and thought it was wild and untameable. Ideally, the single act indicated that Alexander had the skill of handling issues that most people think cannot be contained and this would have made him a hero (Source 1). Quintus indicates that the talk between Darius III and an Athenian exile indicates how magnificent the Macedonian army was under Alexander the Great.
Alexander met his first fierce enemy at the Granicus River, he used tactics like Phalanx and siege warfare to win battles. He and his army travelled around 7000 miles from Macedonia to Egypt and to the Hynapses River in India. Alexander was a genius when it came to war tactics such as when he and his army needed to cross the Hydaspes River without losing many of his troops. So he devised a plan to go up and down the river making noise that sounded like he was preparing for an attack but wouldn’t, but when he finally did attack the enemy had left their guard down making it an easy victory. (Doc A)
A good leader should be humble, gracious, and thankful, but Alexander, on the other hand, was egotistical, conceited, and showed almost no gratitude to his
Alexander was successful as a leader. While being a leader, you have to think of the way others feel and not just your personal needs. “... Alexander with a word of thanks for the gift, took the helmet and in full view of his troops, poured it on the ground”(Document D). The text
Another reason why he was a villain because he killed members of his family so that he would become the ultimate successor to the throne. This should never be how a king becomes the ruler of his kingdom, ever. Even though I believe that Alexander the Great is a villain, others may think he was a hero. They may think that because he had conquered so many other nations.
Alexander was not only the king of Macedonia but he was able to become the most courageous military general in history. He started with the small empire of Macedonia, and he was able to prove that even though his empire was small yet very powerful. Alexander expanded his empire all throughout Europe conquering bigger and stronger empires. He was able to conquer these empires by outsmarting them. Alexander came up with military strategies that seemed unusual and impossible at the time.
After his early death at the age of 33, Alexander left behind a vast empire stretching from Greece to northwestern India. In addition to his empire, however, Alexander also left a lasting impression on the world as a military leader and king. Even today Alexander remains a respected historical character, considering that his military strategies are still used in modern warfare. This paper thus attempts to answer the question what lasting impacts Alexander the Great had on future generations. In doing so this paper will examine three aspects of Alexander the Great: his personality, his military skills and, lastly, the resulting cultural impact of his conquests.
Alexander the great was a hero because although he did kill and enslave people that's really the only truly bad thing he was known for. But he was known for a numerous amount of truly good deeds and only one truly bad things. And in this case the goods out way the bad.
Have you ever wondered if people think if you are good or bad? Like if your actions effect people in good or bad ways. Alexander The Great is a good example of this. As Alexander The Great grew up, he achieved many things.
Alexander the Great was the king and renown general of Macedonia. He led the Greek army against Persia and used many bold tactics in battle. Alexander the Great significantly expanded the Greek legacy by conquering territories. When he conquered a territory, he would not force the locals to assimilate into the Greek culture. This is to ensure they would not rebel against his leadership.
Time We Played God On the 5th of July, 1995, Dolly the sheep was born. She was the first living organism to be cloned entirely from another. It was the first milestone in the history of human bio-engineering, but at the moment she was born, genetic research on humans was brought to a screeching halt. Since then, every single attempt at the cloning or engineering of the human genome has been blocked by the government, for reasons of ‘morality’ and ‘ethnical standards’.
