More handpicked essays just for you.
THE STORY OF ROMEO and JULIET ABOUT LOVE
Literary analysis on romeo and juliet
Character analysis of william shakespeares romeo and juliet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: THE STORY OF ROMEO and JULIET ABOUT LOVE
Many wonder who should truly be blamed for Romeo and Juliet's death. Could it have been the fact that both of their parents refused to let them see each other which cause this or could it have been Friar Lawrence's or the Nurse's fault for persuading and assisting what they knew would end with trouble. Many describe their deaths as an inevitable event that just couldn't be avoided but couldn't it have? Looking back and reading, it is believed that the Friar had the most influence on both Romeo and Juliet causing their deaths. It was even him who suggested that Juliet wait for Romeo in the tomb, which leads to Romeo killing himself since he supposedly believes that Juliet is dead.
Trish Murphy claims that, “The trouble with trouble is, it starts out as fun. " Everyone has had an experience with this once in their life. This was the case for Tybalt… Until he got in too deep to the point where he couldn’t get himself out. In William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, Juliet’s beloved cousin, Tybalt, is responsible for his own death due to holding a grudge against Romeo, murdering Mercutio, and starting the fight that ultimately leads to his death.
Romeo and Juliet Tybalt's various traits and actions are responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet In the drama “Romeo and Juliet,“ by William Shakespeare. Tybalt is to blame for the lovers deaths due to his anger against Montagues and the death of Mercutio. If it were not for the malicious acts of Tybalt, Romeo and Juliet would not have not died. One reason why Tybalt is guilty for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet is because he sends the letter to challenge Romeo to a duel and during the fight kills Mercutio and accident.
Is Romeo really to be blamed for his actions against Tybalt? Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, Your honor i’m Evan Fleisch im here to defend Romeo in the case of the killing of Tybalt. If there was an armed man coming at you after he just stabbed your friend wouldn’t you try to defend yourself? Well the evidence shows that Tybalt had the intention to kill Romeo and he killed Mercutio also.
Shortly following Tybalt’s death in Act III, Scene II, the misinformed Juliet states in line 120 “ But with a rearward following Tybalt’s death, Romeo is banished… all dead… there is no end…” Juliet’s emotions cause her to imagine her world filled with death and the downfall from the conflict between Romeo and Tybalt is only beginning. Not only does this bring her vision of everyone facing an untimely end into the realm of possibility, it also reveals that this could occur at any moment, with the prince as the authoritative figure, he recognizes the ongoing feud and is taking action to try and end it. However, Juliet is unhappy with the Prince’s decision and her tone suggests that she might take drastic measures to be happy once again. In
Romeo and Juliet is a timeless and iconic play written by the very talented William Shakespeare. A tale of two star-cross’d lovers who met a tragic death by their own hands. However, could there be someone else who played a role in their deaths besides themselves? This is a question not commonly asked by teachers and students. I think there is!
According Matt Ferner from the Huffington Post, 149 people were cleared of crimes that they didn’t commit in 2015. It can be challenging to find the person at fault in crimes if multiple people are found at the crime scene or witnesses have some different or biased stories. A penalty has to be placed on someone, and sometimes it could easily be put on multiple people. There’s a case like this in a famous piece of classical literature. In William Shakespeare’s
In Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, Tybalt, the House of Montague and Juliet are to blame for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet. During the process of the play, Tybalt shows overwhelming hostility, this leads to the death of him alongside Mercutio, concluding with Romeo’s banishment from Verona. The House of Capulet, specifically Lord Capulet and Lady Capulet, had forced Juliet into a marriage she openly opposed. Ultimately, Juliet without without think hastily forced the Friar to aid Romeo and Juliet in their love a. The affairs of these events, caused by the thoughtless decisions made by Romeo and Juliet, leads to their untimely demise.
“You will not be punished for your anger, you will be punished by your anger,” Buddha had once said. This saying is easily relatable to Tybalt in Romeo and Juliet. Supposing that Tybalt did not give into his anger, and he did not challenge Romeo to a duel, he would have never been killed. The cause of Tybalt's death is his own fault because he starts the fight, comes back to the fight, and kills Mercutio.
In the play Romeo and Juliet Romeo is to blame for his and Juliet 's death. This is shown first in the play when Romeo kills Tyblalt, In the play Romeo says " Tybalt the reason i have to love thee doth much excuse the appertaing rage to such a greeting villain am i none" act three scene 1 lines 55-60. This causes Tybalt to become angry because he he doesn 't know that Romeo is married to Juliet. This shows Romeo at fault because he should not have been in such a loving mood towards someone who hates him ,and doesn 't yet know that they are related now.
Looking back who was the hot headed character in act one scene one talking down on the Montague family? Tybalt. Tybalt is the cousin of Juliet who had a hatred for the family of Montagues, but an even stronger hatred for Romeo, Juliet’s lover. Tybalt is to blame for the death of Romeo and Juliet because even from the beginning Tybalt wanted to start trouble with the Montagues, second, Tybalt constantly lashing out at Romeo throughout the play and wanting to attack him at the Capulets party, and finally if Tybalt hadn’t killed Mercutio, Romeo wouldn’t have been banished. Back in act one scene one the audience had been introduced to Tybalt, a hot headed young Capulet.
Starting off with the deaths that turned this society into chaos, Tybalt and Mercutio. Tybalt and Mercutio's deaths were not affected by the Montagues or the Capulets for a number of reasons. Mercutio died because of Tybalt; Tybalt murdered him. Tybalt’s first initiative target was Romeo but at Capulet’s party, Capulet warns Tybalt to, “Content thee, gentle coz. Let him alone.
Tybalt (35%) - I believe that Tybalt was mostly to blame because he insisted to fight Romeo which caused all the deaths (including his) and almost everything to happen. If Tybalt never searched for Romeo, wanting to fight him, then Mercutio wouldn’t have died because Mercutio wouldn’t have a reason to fight Tybalt. This means that Tybalt wouldn’t have died because Romeo wouldn’t have wanted to seek revenge for Mercutio. Capulet and Lady Capulet wouldn’t be thinking that Juliet is mourning about Tybalt’s death and Capulet wouldn’t have moved the wedding to Thursday (Wednesday later on) because Tybalt wouldn’t have died. Additionally, Juliet wouldn’t be mourning in the first place because Romeo wouldn’t have gotten banished.
In the Elizabethan tragedy “Romeo and Juliet” written by William Shakespeare, the characters that are known to be adored, can even be the cause of adversities throughout the beautiful play. Many characters could be accountable for the death of Romeo and Juliet. It might be the Nurse, who had very poor judgement, stringing Juliet along in a relationship that wouldn’t last. Would it be Tybalt, the violent cousin, who resented Romeo? Unexpectedly, the person who is to blame for the death of Romeo and Juliet is the carefree Romeo.
Vicious, violent, aggressive, cocky, and rude. All of these adjectives describe Tybalt. Adjectives like those don’t describe an innocent man. Does this sound like a man who would be innocent of a murder that he obligated? In William Shakespeare’s
