British King’s Tyranny over the American Colonies---Is It Real The declaration of Independence claims that “The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States” with a list of grievances of American colonists. Even though the grievances can be proved to be facts, the ruling of the King George III of United Kingdom over the American colony should not be properly called “Tyranny”. “Tyranny” means “arbitrary or unrestrained exercise of power; despotic abuse of authority.”People blamed King George III for supporting taxation, limiting the colonists and other laws not issued by him, while he made his decisions over …show more content…
George became the king of England in 1760, during the French and Indian War, when France and England was fighting for their dominance in North America. Many British troops were sent oversea to fight for the colony. Even though Britain eventually got victory, its economy was the on the edge to collapse. Statistics shows that the British National Debt doubled from £70 million to £140 million. On the other hand, American colonists, even though had participated in the war, had a minor amount debt of £3.5 million. British taxes per capita was 26 shillings a year while Colonial American taxes was 6 pence, fifty-two times less than the British taxes. Before the Independence War American colonists were legitimately citizens of Britain and it is reasonable to made colonists, who did not contribute much to the mother country, share the costs after the war and balance the British wealth. Some in American colonies argued that without the representation in the Parliament, there should not be taxation. However, direct representation was not quite necessary: “each member of Parliament sat ‘not as Representative of his own constituents, but as one of that august Assembly by which the Commons of Great Britain are represented.’’’ The consciousness of self-sufficient independence among colonists led to their resentment of taxation, but not the tyranny of the King George. In short, King George did not abuse his authority by adding tax for appropriate