Uncle Tom's Cabin By Harriet Beecher Stowe

942 Words4 Pages

The Divisive Effect Uncle Tom’s Cabin written by Harriet Beecher Stowe is a novel made to portray the injustice and brutality of slavery, how it affected the enslaved people, and how life was for African Americans at the time. Uncle Tom’s Cabin affected millions of people in the South and gave a voice to people that didn’t have one. The definition of slavery is a system that treats a person as if he were an object, which is also what abortion can be defined as. Abortion has several similarities to slavery including the dehumanizing language used to describe slaves and unborn babies, causing them to be seen as objects, and their lack of rights and choice, the divisive effect slavery and abortion have had in politics and society. When a dominant …show more content…

When one does inhumane things to other human beings, they have the need to convince themselves and other people that the victims aren’t actually human beings, for if they were, they would have just committed heinous acts against their own kind. “One is free to do as he wishes with the unborn baby, and the slave, only when neither of them are deemed as human” (Aucoin). As said in the quote, humans have the tendency to try to excuse their actions, and this can be seen in Uncle Tom’s Cabin when the slave owners would refer to their slaves as “critturs” which can be presumed that they thought African Americans were on an animal level. When the slave trader Mr. Haley was discussing how to take Eliza’s son Harry from her, he exclaimed that they should buy her a necklace and she would be fine because she doesn’t feel as they do. The same thing happens with unborn babies, but instead of critters they are called fetuses, embryos, or not simply living yet, therefore in their minds it is not murder if they aren’t …show more content…

In the early to mid-1800s, the slaves were not allowed to make any decisions for themselves, they were not legally able to marry, and were not recognized as citizens. Similarly, fetuses are not recognized as a person by law, “In Roe v. Wade all nine justices agreed that the use of “person” in the Constitution always assumed a born person, and therefore that the 14th Amendment’s mention of person did not confer constitutional rights until after a live birth” (Robertson). Of course, the Fetus can not legally consent to the procedure which is where slavery and abortion differ. Slaves can consent to be sold or not, and they certainly could consent on all other aspects of their lives, however, they were still silenced by the slave owners that were making a profit off their