ipl-logo

Utilitarian Ethical Viewpoints

1684 Words7 Pages

Sometimes a friend has views that either do not agree with our own, or appear to not even be consistent with each other. In the case of Sarah and Jamie, utilitarian ethical standpoints are brought into question. Utilitarianism is “the doctrine that the rightness of actions is to be judged by their consequences” (Shafer-Landau 78, 2015). It is a form of consequentialism that examines the consequences of actions, and if those actions produce happiness and pleasure (overall, not just for one person) and minimizes the amount of suffering, then that action is correct and morally right. Typically to determine this, one would perform the Happiness Calculus for actions A and B, and whichever one produced the greatest amount of pleasure is the action …show more content…

More people would be saved (the pleasure aspect) than would die (the suffering aspect), so by doing the Happiness Calculus the correct choice was to drop the nuclear bombs. This view is impartial because it is taking simple numbers into account when deciding whether or not killing a large number of people is morally okay. Jamie is not being biased and saying that only some countries can attack to coerce others into submission, but rather a general statement that it is okay for any country to do so in order to stop/prevent a war. To a utilitarian, this unbiased, numerical-based point of view is one of the reasons bombing is morally …show more content…

One problem with this strategy is with what actually counts, the expected consequence (the country surrenders) or the actual results? In the case of bombing a country and killing its citizens, there are more things that could happen than simply the country surrendering. A prime example of this is the United States war in the Middle East. To make Al Qaida surrender, the United States bombed cities where they were thought to be, sent in thousands of troops, and finally, after ten years the leader, Osama Bin Laden, was killed. But what was the cost of this, or the actual outcome? Thousands of our troops died, thousands of innocent civilians were killed or displaced from their homes, and the situation is still terrible with the rising of the new terrorist group ISIS (which has killed over 100,000 people). It could be said that the war led to much more suffering, and did not lead to the intended consequence of the people surrendering with minimal casualties. To a utilitarian, the actual results of an action are what matter, not what a person expects to happen. Somebody might say that the bombing was required, because not doing so could have led to Al Qaida doing more terrible things. However, I sincerely doubt that taking a more precise approach to attacking and dealing with Al Qaida (for instance, sending in specialized teams) rather than

Show More
Related
642 Words | 3 Pages

Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs Against Japan is a book by J. Samuel Walker. He writes about the decision that Truman had to make during World War Two. The Decision that Truman had to make was whether or not the United States should use atomic bombs against Japan. The argument was that if the atomic bombs were used, then Japan would be forced to surrender. “Truman could have decided against it.

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

Because the more people should have died from Operation Downfall, it is a better choice to take the choice which less people die.

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

In document 4, it says, “This is a crime against God and humanity which strikes at the very basis of moral existence. “ This demonstrates that the use of the bomb has gone against the basic rules of life, as it was too inhumane. As the war has already ended, the controversies surrounding the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki still

Read More
303 Words | 2 Pages

Thomas Nagel lists multiple absolutist moral reasons why fighting wars is ethically permissible in his work, “War and Massacre,” which I will reference throughout this paper. While Nagel offers several justifications for an absolutist motivation for fighting a war, the one that I will use to support my argument is that he mentions if the means will outweigh the costs, then in a dilemma between utilitarian versus absolutist choice, utilitarianism looks at what will happen, whereas the absolutist perspective will look at what one is doing (124). Something within this quote that is important to mention is that the scenario Nagel describes where absolutism and utilitarianism are independent, Nagel also suggests that the absolutist argument is only

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

Was Truman justified in dropping the Atomic Bomb? Truman was and wasn’t justified in dropping the atomic bomb. Dropping an atomic bomb sounds terrible and obviously is terrible, but when you closely look at the situation, you can see the reasons why he dropped the bomb. When F. D. Roosevelt died on April 12, 1945, Truman took the office.

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

Thinking with a humane mindset it is more ethical to continue to fight a long and hard struggle, rather than slaughter many innocent

Read More
833 Words | 4 Pages

Whether or not to give money to a homeless man depends on one’s values. Especially if you have the money and would hardly notice it’s absence. This paper will argue whether to give money to a homeless person based on the theories of utilitarianism, Kantian ethics and virtue ethics. Utilitarianism promotes maximizing the most happiness or pleasure. Therefore, this view would give the homeless person the money.

Read More
446 Words | 2 Pages

Just war also frames war in the wrong way and It focuses on a limited conflict. There are long term conflicts to think about before rallying up and setting for battle. “The use of military force to stop the killing in Rwanda would have been, in my view, a just war” (Walzer, Pg. xi). Walzer describes the use of military forces being avoided if possible, but used if necessary.

Read More
1410 Words | 6 Pages

This is because judging the justifications of war cannot be fully realized if war is not waged in a society in which justice and a clear definition of justice have not been established. Cue, right intention. Force and violence may only be employed if the causes are truly just and are enacted for that purpose (Just War Theory). Again, this principle is potentially problematic. The probability of success is perhaps one

Read More
1543 Words | 7 Pages

Ethical theories are ways of telling right from wrong and include guidelines of how to live and act in an ethical way. For example when faced with a difficult situation in your life, you can use ethical theories to assist you in making the right decision. One key theory is consequentialism, which says that an individual’s correct moral response is related to the outcome/ consequence of the act and not its intentions/ motives. Early writers on this theory were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, a modern writer is Peter Singer. For example Brenda Grey has asked for the asthma specialist to visit her weekly, and to decide if this is necessary the professionals involved have to look at how it would affect her wellbeing.

Read More
380 Words | 2 Pages

5. Use the six criteria of the Just War Doctrine (jus ad bellum) to make a morally acceptable argument for the world powers to use military force to end the conflict in Syria. The conflict in Syria is entirely complex to understand; however, it is obvious how human rights of the civilians had been terribly violated for the conflict; additionally, the powers in Syria are just fighting for their own welfares without considering in the security of civilians. Nevertheless, the war on Syria needs justice, but how morally a world power has the right to interference in this insensitive war.

Read More
418 Words | 2 Pages

Over all the dropping of the bomb was a cruel and unneeded decision. The problem could have been solved in a much more peaceful understanding. We could have avoided taking away thousands of innocent lives and futures. In the near future I hope the United States government makes a careful and evaluated decision on any critical war decisions similar to

Read More
1565 Words | 7 Pages

Bernard Williams’ essay, A Critique of Utilitarianism, launches a rather scathing criticism of J. J. C. Smart’s, An Outline of a System of Utilitarian ethics. Even though Williams claims his essay is not a direct response to Smart’s paper, the manner in which he constantly refers to Smart’s work indicates that Smart’s version of Utilitarianism, referred to as act-Utilitarianism, is the main focus of Williams’ critique. Smart illustrates the distinction between act-Utilitarianism and rule-Utilitarianism early on in his work. He says that act-Utilitarianism is the idea that the rightness of an action depends on the total goodness of an action’s consequences.

Read More
203 Words | 1 Pages

For your reply, locate a member of your group with whom you disagree and tell them why you disagree with them with at least 200 words. The disagreement could be over which view they took or their understanding of the other views. Hi, Sarah! Thank you for sharing your opinion.

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

The ethical issues that can be perceived is the use of a napalm to strike a little town affected people who weren’t involved in this war because this children do not have the capacity yet to participate in a war and still they got hurt from the attack.

Read More

More about Utilitarian Ethical Viewpoints

Related Topics

Open Document