Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of ethics in business
The importance of ethics in business
Ethical practises in business
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of ethics in business
The importance of ethics in business
Ethical practises in business
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of ethics in business
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that determines right from wrong when looking at the outcomes. It believes that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good for the greatest number. Consequentialism is found in utilitarianism; consequentialism is largely thought about during war. When you fight for your life in war, you end up taking another person's life. While this may be good for your country, it is hurting a different country.
nature are hedonistic, this means that people given the opportunity would avoid painful situations at all costs, while vigorously reaching out for pleasurable moments. An example of reasoning in act Utilitarianism can be found in the biomedical ethics book (Mapes&Gaize pg. 10). A severely ill infant who has zero chances of survival has contracted a deadly virus, the physician and parents now must make the decision to treat the virus with antibiotics or allow the infant to simply die. In this case it is clear that those involved would be best served by allowing the child to simply die, since the infant has nothing to gain and everything to lose from a painful prolonged life. The anguish and distress of the parents cannot be eliminated regardless
Utilitarianism is an ethical view that favors actions producing the “greatest good.” The use of utilitarian action is displayed in the case of Joe the janitor, when the doctor faces the problem of saving one hundred lives at the price of one. By killing a single janitor, the doctor would save a large number of people..
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that focuses on outcomes to determine right or wrong. Act Utilitarianism holds that the best choice is the one that will benefit a more significant amount of people. Rule Utilitarianism justifies the validity of laws of moral principles that are prevalent in society (Van Staveren, 2007). In this example, the Utilitarian viewpoint would be that the hospital should stay overly prepared to save the lives of many versus keeping low stocks of blood to save money. Thus, from a Utilitarian perspective, the hospital should keep 100% inventory levels for the different blood
Utilitarian is a regularizing moral hypothesis that place the locus of good and bad exclusively on the result, the end legitimize the mean. Solving and taking care of the issue is most important. All matters is just the final products if the final products is great then what you did was ethically right. Considering things are at stake for both stakeholder involved. Utilitarian principles sates that proper course action maximize happiness and treat other how you would wanted to be treated.
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that focuses on outcomes and consequences. When one considers the theory of utilitarianism, it must be understood that the pleasure is a fundamental moral good and the aim is to maximize pleasure and minimize pain. So, when a human is going through the decision making process it is of the utmost importance to look forward at the consequences of the decision and determine if the decision will maximize pleasure and minimize pain. John Stuart Mill, a nineteenth century philosopher focused on the theory of utilitarianism or the Greatest Happiness Principle and claimed that the maximization of happiness for the greatest quantity of people is the ultimate goal. One issue that we face in modern day America that
Utilitarianism is the moral theory that the action that people should take it the one that provides the greatest utility. In this paper I intend to argue that utilitarianism is generally untenable because act and rule utilitarianism both have objections that prove they cannot fully provide the sure answer on how to make moral decisions and what will be the ultimate outcome. I intend to do this by defining the argument for act and rule utilitarianism, giving an example, presenting the objections to act and rule utilitarianism and proving that utilitarianism is untenable. Both act and rule utilitarianism attempt to argue that what is right or wrong can be proven by what morally increases the well being of people. Act utilitarianism argues that
First and foremost, albeit the validity whether the case study is based on or correlating with a real world occurrence is unconfirmed, the assumption has to be made that in the world of the case study good and equally bad consequences occur attributed to the decisions made by the stakeholders. Consequently, by analyzing the behaviors of the stakeholders in the case study the logistically apt theory to apply is Act Utilitarianism. First thing to recognize, is that the composition of the Act Utilitarianism theory is derived from Utility Principle, or Great Happiness Principle. By definition from the Applied Ethics textbook it states that, “The right action in any situation is the one that tends to produce the greatest possible balance of happiness over unhappiness for the greatest possible number. Bearing this in mind, Act Utilitarianism from Jeremy Bentham, maintains that the right thing to do
I personally strongly disagree with Utilitarianism in general, and especially with the Greatest Happiness principle. Personally I think many things are wrong with it, including the fact that people can’t see the future and determine the consequences of their actions, the fact that it allows immoral behavior in the name of increasing overall happiness, that it allows for government laws to be broken in order to increase overall happiness, and the way it disregards the motive behind an action. In theory it sounds like it would be a fair and moral ethical principle because it promotes the good of the majority, but when broken down I think the Greatest Happiness Principle has major flaws. The Greatest Happiness Principle is Mill's notion that any action that endorses happiness and/or the absence of pain is good or right.
There exist two sorts of utilitarianism: the ACT and the RULE. The Act Utilitarian expresses that an action is awesome just to the degree that it progresses net, complete, expected utility. Then again, the Rule Utilitarian says that an action is awesome just to the degree that it agrees with a fundamental which would propel net, absolute, expected utility, and were it to be all around totally (Posner,
At the level of implementation, there are more problems that the utilitarian model is unequipped to handle. One of said problems is its conflicts with current social, and legal, structures. More specifically, utilitarianism places the most emphasis on happiness while, generally, society emphasizes truth. This manifests on an interpersonal level, as it is more beneficial to lie to obtain things from others, whatever brings the most pleasure while using deception to avoid pain. In particular, I encountered this conflict when it came to my interactions with figures in power, with my father being the most notable.
It states that an action which is deemed right is one that has not merely some good consequences, but also the greatest amount of good consequences possible when the negative consequences are also given due considerations. According to the utilitarian principle, the righteousness of an action is solely judged on the basis of its consequences. Classical utilitarianism determines the balance of pleasure and pain for each individual affected by the action in question as well as the amount of utility for the whole
When discussing both act and rule utilitarianism, it is important to understand that both of them agree in terms of the overall consequence of an action, because they emphasize on creating the most beneficial pleasure and happiness in the outcome of an act. Despite this fact, they both have different principles and rules that make them different from each other. Act utilitarianism concentrates on the acts of individuals. Meaning that if a person commits an action, he/she must at least have a positive utility. The founders of utilitarianism define positive utility as happiness and pleasure and consider it to be a driving force of all positive and morally right acts.
According to Schermerhorn (2015) the utilitarian viewed ethical performance to distribute the greatest good to a large number of people. John Mill a philosopher in the 19th century felt that results would evolve around the implications of right and wrong principals in terms of consequences. In an ideal business world managers are able to use various performance actions to demonstrate an understanding of business issues and desired results for their customers or organization. An example Schermerhorn (2015) mention was if a CEO was leading a company that was heading toward a financial downfall they decide to make cuts within the company. This will allow residual jobs to be saved and the company will remain profitable.
In the end, to summarize the main outline of this paper we talked about the utilitarianism theory, and how it was applied to five case studies. The utilitarianism theory gives supporters a decisive way to determine the morality of an action. Event though there are multiple forms of the utilitarianism theory, there is only one basic utilitarian standard; act utilitarianism. Implying that the best possible action to take is the one that brings about the most happiness. Through the various case studies we used the utilitarianism theory to evaluate, and make a conclusion based on the theory.