ipl-logo

Valentine Shortis Insanity Defense

1230 Words5 Pages

The insanity defence is one of the most controversial topics in the legal system, used by many criminal defendants as an excuse for their unlawful activities. In fact, the Canadian legal system has experienced this in the case of Valentine Shortis, an Irish Immigrant who was convicted of killing two men, injuring one and attempted murder on March 1, 1895. Charged with murder and sentenced to death, Valentine’s Lawyer St. Pierre argued that he suffered from insanity, such as his inability to distinguish right from wrong. There was evidence from Shortis's friends, family, and neighbours who claimed that Shortis was arrogant and mischievous person. According to Friedland, the crown (Macmaster) stated that “he did many eccentric, rash and even …show more content…

One of Shortis’s friends (McVicar) claimed that Valentine spoke about robbing the mill many times. It’s apparent that Valentine's intention was to conspire and contrive a plan with McVicar to rob the mill. In fact, the case revealed that Valentine had some financial problems and his parents refused to send money to him (p. 5). Here we see that Shortis had an intent to rob the mill and obtaining money was his motive. Since he had an intent and motive to rob the mill, he was considered not legally …show more content…

49). He then shot and killed Loy, who was about to call a doctor for help. Still, Valentine's lawyers claimed that he was “labouring under natural imbecility”(p. 86) and “he did not know the quality of the act and of knowing that such act was wrong” (p. 109). The fact that Valentine went back to Wilson’s body and shot him countless times to ensure that he was dead, proved he was not feeble-minded. As stated in the book, Shortis lit a fire in attempted to smoke Arthur and Lowe from the vault (p. 6). This indicates that Valentine knew what he was doing and willfully tried to murder these men too. The fact that he kept going back and forth from the vault to Wilson, each time giving him an opportunity to reflect on his actions, further proved that he was sane during the crime.
There was a moment in the book when Valentine said to Smith “shoot me, or lend me your revolver and I will”(p. 44). This quotation proved that Shortis knew he had done something wrong, thus, surrendering. Why did Valentine surrender if he had no knowledge of his actions and why did he ask for the revolver in the first place when a chisel was hidden in his coat. Here, Valentine made a desperate attempt to make Smith defenceless. If he had given up the gun, he too would have died. The simple statement of Valentine telling Smith to kill him, showed that

Show More
Related
782 Words | 4 Pages

Citation: Morgan v Sate, 537 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 1989) Facts: James A. Morgan, the appellant, who at sixteen was diagnosed as organically brain-damaged and brain-impaired, murdered the elderly woman with whom he was employed to perform manual labor. Morgan is described as a teenage alcoholic, who since the age of four sniffed gasoline on a regular basis.

Read More
1379 Words | 6 Pages

Immediately afterwards I heard another pistol, and in a few minutes I heard him at the door calling out “Oh madam! Give me some water, and heal my wounds”. If Lewis tried to commit suicide, then why would he say something like “Oh madam! Give me some water, and heal my wounds” if he tried to kill himself? In the video Lewis’s Death Decoded, a doctor had said “that he died by the hands of an assassin”.

Read More
534 Words | 3 Pages

The first reason that proves Jimmy Valentine was truly dedicated to living a moral life was that he changed his name. His new name is Ralph Spencer. Jimmy did this because he wanted to become a new person and live a new life. Also Jimmy Valentine is not there any more. His name got changed just as he wishes to change too.

Read More
1636 Words | 7 Pages

Whereas the Crown concentrated on disproving the defence’s insanity plea finding a contradiction in one of the defence’s psychiatrists, Dr. Clarke’s testimony, as Macmaster found Dr. Clarke had used his description of a criminal to describe the term moral imbecile, used to describe Shortis (Friedland, 1986, p.105). On 3 November 1895, the jury found Valentine Shortis guilty for the murders and was sentenced to death by hanging on 3 January 1896 (Friedland, 1986, p.115-117). Although the sentence was to be carried out, Greenshields made a statement stating, “(T)he only thing we now intend doing is to petition the Minister if Justice for commutation of sentence from the death penalty to imprisonment for life” (Friedland, 1986, p.119). Before the sentence was carried out, George Foster, the defence’s solicitor, went to present the petition in Ottawa to the minister of justice, Sir Charles Hibbert Tupper (Friedland, 1986, p.122). A cabinet meeting was held to discuss the petition of Valentine Shortis, a vote was to be made from ten cabinet members on whether to sentence was to be execution or life in prison.

Read More
588 Words | 3 Pages

“On my asking the soldiers why they had fired without order, they said they heard the word fire and suppose it came from Me.” said Captain Thomas Preston. The confusion of the soldiers and the unclear directions from the captain led to the merciless shooting. Had the orders been clearer, eleven men would not have

Read More
404 Words | 2 Pages

Then Jimmy figures out what really happened to Bobby. Jimmy says to the commander, “come over here to check the room.” Lydia walks into the room and Jimmy locks the door, and points a gun up to Lydia’s head. Lydia replies,“ what the heck are you doing.”

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

These are all things Shortis did while working at the cotton mill and daily in his live. Just because Shortis manage to do this daily, does not mean he did not to do it off repetition. The authentication of these statements shows that even though Shortis committed wrongful acts in his

Read More
1009 Words | 5 Pages

Cross blames himself, knowing “He had loved Martha more than his men, and as a consequence Lavender was now dead…” (p. 121). First Lieutenant Jimmy Cross is distracted by his infatuation for Martha, which ultimately results in Ted Lavender’s death, forcing Cross to realize his fantasies for Martha are wrong and that he is not fulfilling his duties as a lieutenant. Lieutenant Cross is inattentive to the war and his responsibilities because he is unable and unwilling to stop thinking about his adoration for Martha.

Read More
845 Words | 4 Pages

A detective must develop a quick wit and sharp observational skill to analyze, examine and evaluate the clues in order to uncover the greatest mysteries. In “The Maltese Falcon,” by Dashiell Hammett, detective Sam Spade combines several features of a worthy private investigator, most notably his detached demeanor, a keen eye for detail, and unflinching determination to achieve his justice. At the end of the novel, Sam Spade accused Brigid O’Shaughnessy of killing Spade’s partner, Miles Archer. Spade puts her under extreme emotional and time pressure, so she breaks down and confesses. However, at what point of the novel did Spade notice the best, most convincing evidence that led him to believe that Brigid O’Shaughnessy killed Archer.

Read More
565 Words | 3 Pages

Yes, taking these precautions was sane of him, but stalking, murdering, and hallucinating are all traits that lead towards being insane. In the end, the narrator did prove to be insane, with his reasonless murder, and absurd hallucinations. But all in all, even if the evidence does lead to the narrator being insane, as Poe once said, “The scariest monsters are the ones that lurk within our

Read More
1368 Words | 6 Pages

“No, I won’t!” said Henry, in a still stronger tone. With this, two of the constables pulled out their shining pistols, and swore, by their Creator, that they would make him cross his hands or kill him. Each cocked his pistol, and, with fingers on the trigger, walked up to Henry, saying, at the same time, if he did not cross his hands, they would blow his damned heart out. “Shoot me, shoot me!” said Henry; “you can 't kill me but once.

Read More
506 Words | 3 Pages

This violence was brought about by assumption, when really they were brothers all along. The sniper realizes, and regrets his actions at the end. War and conflict is about protecting loved ones, and about defending your rights and liberties, but we must be careful not to let these conflicts blind our minds with assumption, or violence will destroy

Read More
1879 Words | 8 Pages

Hamlet before his duel with Laertes begins to tell Laertes that at the time when he insulted Laertes and fought him it was due to his own mental illness which Hamlet proclaims was “madness” (V.ii.217-219). Hamlet 's mental state is sane because he tells Laertes that the reason for is actions back then was because he had become temporarily insane. Hamlet must be sane in order to identify whether he had gone insane because if someone was insane they would not care about the actions they had done. Hamlet’s actions are not those of sane person when he murders Claudius. When Hamlet realizes it was Claudius, who was at fault for his mother’s death, he becomes enraged and stabs him with the sword that had been poisoned at the tip.

Read More
1042 Words | 5 Pages

Insanity is not a valid defense for one main reason. You are either crazy or you are not. In the end, Mack Herring was acquitted for murder. He felt as if he was pressured into doing it and he also thought he was helping her by committing the crime.

Read More
866 Words | 4 Pages

That is not a bad thing because he was just trying to hide the fact that he used to be a burglar because now he isn’t and that’s all that matters. Another reason people may think Jimmy Valentine is not dedicated to living a moral life is, in the beginning of the story, he got put in jail after he was caught breaking into safes. That doesn’t affect him being dedicated to living a moral life because, he changed into a more honorable man that was dedicated to live a moral life. The last reason someone might think Jimmy Valentine is not dedicated to living a moral life is, living a moral life means you do the right thing and in the beginning of the story, Jimmy Valentine did not really do that. Although Jimmy Valentine did make some wrong choices, towards the end of the story he didn’t make those bad choices, and even rescued a little girl from a safe.

Read More

More about Valentine Shortis Insanity Defense

Related Topics

Open Document