ipl-logo

Wallflower Censorship

1966 Words8 Pages

The First Amendment gives Americans the right to read any material they want, so the censorship and banning of books is not okay in the slightest. One of the many books that people are trying to have censored is The Perks of Being a Wallflower, a book written by Stephen Chboksy. This book has been subject to many challenges due to the amount of mature content within its pages. This mature content includes: sexual situations, drug and alcohol abuse, abuse, and mature language. Despite all of this mature content, teenagers should still be allowed to read The Perks of Being a Wallflower because it is their first amendment right to. Americans have the right to read anything they want, and the banning of any books should not be allowed. The drama …show more content…

One of which is when Charlie feels that he has been smoking too much marijuana, so instead he decides to starting consuming more alcohol. He writes, "I just drank because I figured that it was about time to stop smoking so much pot" (Chbosky 154). Substance abuse is substance abuse, and all Charlie did was switch substances. Another scene involves masturbation again, with Charlie writing, "There was this guy called "Action Jack" because supposedly he was caught masturbating at a drunk party" (Chbosky 159). Not only did “Action Jack” masturbate at a party, but he masturbated at a party where everyone was drunk. It is understandable why a parent might not want their child reading this book because of that. One of the more appreciable reasons this book could be challenged for is when Charlie tells a story about bestiality. Charlie writes, "There was a guy named Carl Burns and everyone called him C.B. And one day C.B. got so drunk at a party that he tried to 'fuck' the host's dog" (Chbosky 159). Bestiality is extremely taboo, and therefore this is one of the few reasons it would make sense for someone to challenge this book. However, it is Americans’ right to read books like this regardless of their

Show More
Related
260 Words | 2 Pages

Others have decided not to ban it, because of the first amendment. Although banning Fahrenheit 451 would be an infringement on the author's right to speak freely, the long-lasting mental and physical devastation to the children reading this book that arises as a result of

Read More
1456 Words | 6 Pages

In 1998, McClintock High School in Tempe, Arizona assigned students to read The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain. The book has long been regarded as a controversial novel, and each generation that comes upon it has found something that rubs against the current societal norms. The mother of a student at McClintock took serious offense to the use of the word, “nigger” throughout the book and protested that it be banned due to the racial discrimination (Source I). Huck Finn is just one of the many pieces of literature that have been labelled “challenging,” and many feel that they do not deserve a place in schools’ curriculum. However, the study of challenging literature introduces students to new ideas and lessons that they can apply

Read More
781 Words | 4 Pages

The books are normally banned for good intention or causes to protect the public, especially the young audience from controversial ideas. Reference to

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

Books are an essential way to gain knowledge whether they are controversial or not. Thousands of books have been banned from public libraries and schools due to being deemed ‘inappropriate’ by parents, administrators, or religious leaders. Whether Americans should ban books in public libraries and schools is an often debated topic. This censorship of books is dangerous, as it restricts the American people's’ ability to access information, leaving Americans ignorant. Historically, banning books is not a new practice.

Read More
768 Words | 4 Pages

The book sheds a tear as it is banned by administration for students to read. The Catcher in the Rye should not be banned for summer reading for incoming sophomores because of its “explicit” content. After high school, out in the real world, life experiences are not censored or banned to protect you. You must experience life and all that comes with it.

Read More
2114 Words | 9 Pages

Every child deserves a proper education. Banned books are depriving students of a well rounded, culturally aware, literary education because of the culture that is discarded, the history that is being withheld, and the education that young people could get through these banned books. The point of history is to learn from it and learn from others mistakes, but how can we do that if we are not allowed to learn it. As teachers shouldn’t you be teaching us how to make judgment calls like understanding that Mark Twain was a racist, but a man of his time and that doesn’t change him being an amazing writer. We cannot learn things such as that if we cannot even read most of Mark Twain’s books.

Read More
1268 Words | 6 Pages

All books that young adults read have power. Their power results in their ability to sway and to change the reader in so many ways, not the least of these is morally. These books can create a moral sense in the young by demonstrating what is morally right and what is morally wrong. They can raise and resolve ethical issues. The reader may not agree with each resolution, but is certainly forced to think about issues he or she may never have thought about before (Smith 63).

Read More
255 Words | 2 Pages

Would people rather live in the 1960’s. Some events that were in the 1960’s are the space race, civil rights movement. They had great artist and writers. Drugs were probably over used in the 1960’s,but your kids were safe to walk home unlike today. The 1960’s are better than now today.

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

In any given speech, or piece of literature for that matter, there is a certain amount of pathos, logos, and ethos used by the author, a technique that people like to call the “Rhetorical Triangle”. In the thought provoking speech: “Tide of Voices: Why Poetry Matters Now”, the speaker spectacularly uses these tactics to prove the validity, importance, and beauty of poetry. Mark Doty, the author, is a recognized American poet, who was the winner of the National Book Award for Poetry in 2008. This accomplishment on its own establishes ethos, a form of trust and credibility. Obviously, a poet defending poetry is as expected as a mathematician defending mathematics, but still, the reliability and status is there.

Read More
666 Words | 3 Pages

Children just like us have a mind of their own and should be able to make their own decisions by themselves to either pick up the book or to leave it alone. Censorship does not exist in public places such as stores even though children enter stores everyday these kids have learned the decency of what they should or should not do they learned what they want and what they do not want what they like and what they do not like that should be a reason that children should be able to make censorship their choice.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

“American citizens who care about the improvement of education are urged to join students, teachers, librarians, administrators, boards of education, and professional and scholarly organizations in support of the students’ right to read” (The Students Right to Read). Citizens should be allowed to stand up if they believe books should not be banned. It is important that writers should be able to have their books out to the public without getting banned. “Challengers often employ a definition that maintains that banning materials is the only true form of censorship,”(Knox 740). Censorship of books is common and a real problem.

Read More
1174 Words | 5 Pages

Intro 1: What if your young child is looking through a book at your public library and comes across a topic that was way too mature for their mind set. Would you be okay with it? A big controversial issue that has been going on in the past year is if books should be banned. Now, no one is trying to banish libraries across the globe but people have requested to ban books that are inappropriate. This matter has grown to be worse because everyone has an opinion.

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

Attempting to destroy the history that has already occurred is a threatening maneuver to society’s growth. And no matter the case, banning and censorship of books is against the first amendment granted to the American people. And this does not mean anyone should be forced to read something if they do not choose to. The freedom to choose is still there for all, at least in America. If a parent doesn’t want their child reading something they can choose not to allow them to read it themselves.

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

The First Amendment states, “…abridging the freedom of speech or of press…” When a book is banned, it is denying the freedom of an author to express him or herself and is denying a person the right to access that book. Although banning books is the freedom to express an opinion against the book, it would hurt the author that wrote the book and make them feel inferior. Taken from I Am Very Real written by Kurt Vonnegut, “You have insulted me, and I am a good citizen, and I am very real.” In this, Kurt Vonnegut is showing how when one of his books was banned, how offended and hurt he was by that one action. The people banning the

Read More
1617 Words | 7 Pages

There are countless reasons that everybody should know why books are being banned all over the world! One of the reasons is that parents do not want their children to be exposed to inappropriate topics. Moreover, some books discusses topics that people object to like dark arts and homosexuality. However, there are also reasons why books should not be banned. When children enjoy books, it improves their vocabulary, and it teaches them life lessons.

Read More

More about Wallflower Censorship

Related Topics

Open Document