In the cases of discrimination, anti-discrimination laws that are set into place take action for this kind of situations. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of race, color, sex, or ethnic origin. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act, known as ADEA, prohibits any discrimination against employees of ages 40 or older. Lastly, the Americans with Disabilities Act, known as ADA, prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of disabilities and requires that employers reasonably accommodate individuals with disabilities who can otherwise perform a job. Since these three acts are set into place and outlaws all related behaviors in the workplace, situations still rise. ("Anti-discrimination …show more content…
Some may find a way of just meeting in the middle. ("Anti-discrimination Laws." ). A prime example is Wal-Mart, one of the largest public multinational retail operation stores in the United States. The Wal-Mart stores that are spread out across the United States get plenty of good publicity by provides disabled workers with a job. You see these workers at entrances and exits to greet customers and say goodbye to customers. Some may be in wheelchairs, chairs, and sometimes may be standing up. This is Walmart 's way of following the anti-discrimination laws but at the same time not slowing the process of business. Wal-Mart gets away with this the cleanest way possible while other companies try but fail to succeed. The companies try to avoid liabilities for discriminatory behavior by using agency temporaries, leased employees, or contract company workers. In some instances, anti-discrimination issues do not deal with joint liability, resulting for the issue to be left for the courts to resolve.
One of the most infamous instances of discrimination was the case of Brown v. Board of Education and Plessy v. Ferguson. When brought up, people often say that these cases were the breaking points towards anti-discrimination laws. Because of the way things were back then before segregation laws were passed, it was hard to find a way to prevent discrimination from happening.
…show more content…
The issue of gay marriage started to reach some turmoil when people were being discriminated on the way the saw themselves. People started to do the same things they did to people back when race was the discrimination issue. People started not to serve people, people being kicked out, and people even being killed. Anti-gay laws were put into place by Governor Phil Bryant of Mississippi. This was very controversial because it basically enforced the crimes that were happening towards the gay community. The legislation allows churches, religious charities, and privately held businesses to decline services to people if doing so would violate their religious beliefs on marriage and gender. Georgia governor, Nathan Deal, is also under pressure because he has similar interest. Phil Bryant is under turmoil because when signing the new bill he didn’t tell people that his own son was gay. So now it seems that he doesn’t respect the choice of his