Warm Bodies Theory

1407 Words6 Pages

Warm Bodies is a movie based around the zombie apocalypse with a “Romeo and Juliet” twist that was released in January of 2013. Its plot is about a world during the raging apocalypse and the differentiations between those that are still human and the ones that are zombies. The main co-protagonist is a zombie man known as “R.” He can not remember anything about his past life, including his name, and has no idea how he became a zombie. Him and the rest of the undead live separated from the humans by a large wall around a city. “R” and some of his zombie “friends” (he cannot be friends with any of them because he cannot make connections with others) go and try to find food, more commonly known as human brain. They stumble upon the second co-protagonist, who is human and named Julie, and her group. “R” eats Julie’s boyfriend’s …show more content…

Your body is composed of many different aspects and your mind is just one piece. You yourself can only be one thing, so in the argument of “are you your mind or your body,” you must be your mind because it is simply one thing. Van Inwagen argues that you can be free in some instances in bound in others. In the case of free will, Van Inwagen believes that you have the ability to choose freely as long as there are no implications on that choice. Humans believe that they are free and that they have the choice of freedom even if in some instances they act only because of previous situations. Parfait believes that your personal identity does not exist. Humans have a distinct fear in the loss of self, but living already proves that fear. After death, you no longer exist. Your personal identity is gone and there is no one else who is you. Parfait argues that it is a waste of time to preserve personal existence for a short