ipl-logo

Was Andrew Carnegie A Hero?

654 Words3 Pages

Clink, Clink, Clink! That is the sound of the money going into Andrew Carnegie's pocket. Who was Andrew Carnegie? Well Andrew was a wealthy business executive. He ran the biggest steel business in the 19s. That made him one of the richest men. But what did he do with all the money he was making? The real question is, was Carnegie a hero? A hero is someone who does outstanding achievements. There were three reasons Andrew Carnegie was a hero he always gave back, he didn't just leave his money with his family, and brought beauty to a castle in Scotland. My first argument was that Carnegie was a hero because he donated a lot of money to charities. This does not always make you a hero though. However one piece of evidence that supports this reason is in document B. As in document B, Carnegie wants to spend his surplus on a good clause. A surplus is left over money after something like a job has been done. In document B we also see he said that the richest don't spend their money on a good clause. This is him saying that the richest have the most money but never use it for the good. A second piece of supporting evidence is in document C. In document C, we see a chart showing all the money …show more content…

One piece of evidence that supports this reason is in document B. We can see that Carnegie said that he didn't want to leave his money with his family. But inside of leaving his money with his family, He would leave it to better uses. I believe in not leaving all of his money with his family because they didn't work for it and other people need it. A second piece of supporting evidence is in document B as well. He didn't leave his money with his family. He inside gave it to better use. He also did this because he said that rich people don't do that good in this world. This evidence helps explain why Carnegie was a hero because he didn't leave his money with his family, but inside for better

Show More
Related
606 Words | 3 Pages

He began his business in 1872. 30 years later, he became a world’s richest ex-businessman. He died after the end of World War I. Andrew Carnegie was not a hero in three areas of his life: Living, Business, and Charity. The first area in which Andrew Carnegie was not a hero was about Living.

Read More
1277 Words | 6 Pages

One argument that could be made would be from Document 1. This tells us Carnegie’s opinion of society in which he states he believes in the survival of the fittest and thinks you need to work for what you want. People could take this as that he doesn't want to help poor people and that he doesn't care about them. Also it could be supported through the fact that he gave most money to schools and organizations and not to poor people. Another argument could be related to the treatment of workers in Document 3.

Read More
1191 Words | 5 Pages

Carnegie could have discussed the reservations the poor had about the ability of some to become rich through industrialization and how they felt about his Gospel of Wealth. Did the poor really want money from the rich, who had control of many forces throughout the nation? Carnegie fails to provide a bias opinion on the divide between the rich and the poor because he is no longer poor. He expresses the faults in the wealthy hoarding their money for themselves, but continues to believe the wealthy should exist. The classifications of rich and poor also goes against Carnegie’s belief that the American society was changing into something new, when in reality they were adopting some of the old colonial ways like

Read More
549 Words | 3 Pages

The three characteristics of a hero are courage, integrity, and concern for others. Andrew Carnegie was a hero in these three areas of his life: wealth, community, and his ambitious state of mind. The first area in which Andrew Carnegie was he started as a blue collar worker and worked his way up the ‘workforce ladder’. When Andrew was just twelve years old he started working at a textile mill 12 hours a day for only $1.20 a week just so his family could eat and have shelter.

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

Carnegie didn’t get his money honestly sometimes, and didn’t care if the people didn’t like how he did things, because how he was doing things made him money. Carnegie didn’t treat his workers well, and docked their pay constantly, so he could turn around and donate libraries and money to paint himself as a philanthropist. To prove this, “he didn’t always follow the rules or treat people kindly”, meaning he would dock his workers pay, and have really dangerous working conditions just so he could make more money. This proves that Carnegie cared about making money more than anything else, but that also meant making lives harder for his workers.

Read More
408 Words | 2 Pages

Carnegie could have offered more to his employers who risked their lives each day to provide him with a successful

Read More
430 Words | 2 Pages

To consider surplus as trust funds to produce the most beneficial results from the community. ’’ He wanted to donate all his money for the greater good of the community. Andrew Carnegie also opened many Carnegie libraries where people can use books without a fee because he believed that if a man wanted work and gained knowledge he should be able to. In (document 9) it shows how much he donated not in total but in that list alone he donated 271,013,000 dollars and in total he gave 350,695,653.

Read More
780 Words | 4 Pages

In document B, we can see an article that Carnegie himself wrote, in June of 1889, where he states “(why should a man) wait until he is dead before he becomes of much good in the world?” He shows here not only his desire to help the world before he dies, but his aspiration that others do the same. He also expresses in the same article “The man who dies rich dies disgraced.” He again here exemplifies his want for the wealthy to do good for communities with their finances. These pieces of evidence show Carnegie not only wanted to make sure he was giving back, but that other affluent people were

Read More
640 Words | 3 Pages

Carnegie preached wealth should not be personal but rather shared. He fought for economic equality by ensuring the wealth at the time was spread out for the public purpose, as well as making sure his wealth would be put to great use once he passed. Nonetheless, the United States economy would not have taken off without industrialists like Andrew

Read More
427 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Carnegie was a hero in some people 's eyes , not so much in others . That’s why everyone has their own opinion. In this essay you will read one reason someone might think he’s a hero , and two reasons why he is not a hero for the rest of the people. What that means is that this paper mostly leans on that Andrew Carnegie is not a hero and you will read why . Andrew Carnegie was a very wealthy man.

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

This goes to show that Carnegie is a hero because of his big heart and wanting to spread philanthropy to other wealthy people in the

Read More
625 Words | 3 Pages

Tucker wanted the wealthy to give those in need the ability to help themselves. He also believed that those with wealth should have tried to fix real issues regarding the society rather than giving gifts. Carnegie was dealing with the issue of education in his society by providing the funds necessary to help build libraries. Libraries provided his community the research and knowledge they needed to grow as a community together. Carnegie is a hero because he brought the value of knowledge to his

Read More
878 Words | 4 Pages

His philanthropies went towards things like libraries and donating instruments to help with education for the public. Giving away his wealth to help others better themselves, was a high priority for him. He contributed to the development of churches, libraries, and universities to help those who were working towards something. This may have been a result of the difficult childhood he had and the struggle he faced when trying to improve his life. Both this and Social Darwinism had a part in changing Carnegie’s view of himself from the son in a poverty-stricken family, into someone who took advantage when opportunities were presented and created an exceptional life for himself.

Read More
835 Words | 4 Pages

In this text, he makes a valid argument as to why the rich should administer their own wealth unto those with less fortune. He begins his argument by explaining how wealth has revolutionized the United States. Carnegie mentions how the Sioux chief's wigwam was similar in appearance when compared to the huts of those inferior to him, and then compares this to the differences in economic classes of the 1800s. Carnegie later states how the very definition of wealth has changed throughout the years, where the poorest farmer of the 1860s owns more luxuries than the landlord of just a few years prior. Carnegie includes these two facts because he wants to show how much society has progressed throughout the last few hundred years.

Read More
454 Words | 2 Pages

Carnegie is not a hero because he took money, only gave to other wealthy recipients, and contributed largely to his own.     Andrew Carnegie took money away from deserving people. Carnegie cut the wages of his workers to donate money elsewhere. In document D, there are two images of Carnegie, one is giving a wage cut notice to the workers and the other is giving a check to Scotland and donating a library to Pittsburg. Carnegie’s employees were working hard and trying to survive in a tough economy, their wages did not deserve a cut.

Read More

More about Was Andrew Carnegie A Hero?

Open Document