ipl-logo

Was Japanese Atomic Bombing Justified

770 Words4 Pages

The Atomic bombing in Japan, WWII The atomic bomb that was dropped by America and the USA had many Valid Reasons for used on Japan in World War Two, 1945. The USA Americans had the help of many scientist known as Albert Einstein, Enrico Fermi and Richard Feynman. Many research was put against the first atomic bomb that took up to 7 years to conduct, starting from 1938-1945. The USA Americans dropped the first atomic bomb called 'Little Boy' on the city of Japan known to be Hiroshima on August the 6th 1945. Knowing the first bomb being dropped on Hiroshima, three days later on the 9th of August 1945, the USA Americans dropped the second bomb called 'Fat Man' and was dropped on Nagasaki. The two atomic Bombs being dropped on the city of Japan both had positive reasons for their action as it ended the war. Both bombs being dropped was definitely justified as many more casualties would have resulted if the bombs weren't dropped and the war continued. Lastly The two atomic bombs were needed as it was kind of a warning to Japan that the USA Americans wouldn't give up, and to show the world that Atomic weapons has been introduced. The use of Atomic Bombs in Nagasaki and Hiroshima was Completely Justified as it ended World War II and pushed the Japanese to …show more content…

Their main target was to win for their country and pushed Japan to its limits until they surrendered. President Truman would have invaded Japan with his troops if the atomic bomb wasn't used. This means that many more American and Japanese lives would have been losted during the invasion if the atomic bomb wasn't involved. One historian that supported the atomic bomb said "so they would have fought until there was no more Japan". This means that the Japan would have kept on fighting until they were down to the last man, but instead the war ended meaning some Japanese soldiers live's were

Show More
Related

Was The Us Justified Dbq Essay

480 Words | 2 Pages

Was the United States justified in dropping the atomic bombs in Japan at the end of WWII? FLASH and BOOM! On August 6th, 1945, America dropped the deadliest bomb, atomic bomb, on Hiroshima to end the WWII. Three days later, they dropped another atomic bomb on Nagasaki. They were attacking western part of Japan.

Read More

Was Hiroshima Justified Dbq Essay

697 Words | 3 Pages

Yes, it did prevent others from dying, and no, it killed hundreds of thousands innocent people. So the bombing of Hiroshima is both justified and not justified. The first point you could make is yes, the bomb was 100 percent justified and it was a good idea. War is an awful thing that our world has to go through, because many die and lots of land is damaged. An article that agrees the bomb was good claims, “On Okinawa, only a few weeks before Hiroshima, 123,000 JApanese and Americans killed each other.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq

882 Words | 4 Pages

This image shows how big of a threat and danger Japan is- it also shows how important it is to bring Japan down. The atomic bombs are justified because of Japan’s aggressions towards U.S. The United States’ use of atomic bombs on Japan is justifiable because it saved thousands of American lives; the Japanese were given fair warning, and their aggressions towards the U.S.

Read More

To What Extent Was Truman Justified In Dropping The Atomic Bomb

608 Words | 3 Pages

WWII-Atomic Bomb Thousands and thousands of kids, families gone in seconds from one bomb that was ordered to hit the enemy forces by the United States president. The U.S had a tough decision to make when fighting the second world war and when the first know thing was made called the atomic bomb. The question is, was president Truman justified in dropping the two atomic bombs and killing thousands of lives in a blink of an eye to end the war? Truman wasn’t justified in dropping the bomb because of all the lives that had to be sacrificed. If he just stuck to the original plan and kept going from island to island then maybe less lives would of been taken.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

611 Words | 3 Pages

In an attempt to get Japan to surrender to the Allies, in August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the nation. The first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and the second on Nagasaki. Although these bombs did contribute to Japan’s surrender and the end of the war, the use of this atomic weapon was an irrational and horrible decision. The United States should have abstained from using the two atomic bombs on Japan for the sake of civilian lives and possible alternatives to their decision. These bombs not only had detrimental effects on Japan, they also led to an arms race amongst several nations.

Read More

How Is Hiroshima Bombing Justified

1232 Words | 5 Pages

Again, the Japanese had no knowledge of the bombs, causing even more devastating casualties. People have argued over the years if the atomic bombing was justified or not, and multiple points can be made on both arguments, yet I take it that the bombing on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not justified. Keep in

Read More

Atomic Bombing Dbq

1327 Words | 6 Pages

Essay To what extent were the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki justifiable? The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have been controversial. There is much controversy over the issue of whether or not the bombings were necessary to ensure Japanese surrender in the Second World War, on terms satisfactory to the United States of America.

Read More

Truman Justified To Drop The Atomic Bomb Analysis

1056 Words | 5 Pages

You see a blast six miles away as bright as the sun, then the ground shakes tremendously. You just saw an atom bomb go off over Hiroshima, Japan. Prior to this day President Truman gave orders to drop the atomic bomb to try ending world two. Truman was justified to drop the atomic bomb to end the war because it was planned strategically, he had good political reasoning, and he had good moral points as to why it was okay in dropping the bomb.

Read More

Should We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

852 Words | 4 Pages

In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Justified Research Paper

1838 Words | 8 Pages

Soon the U.S was attacked by Japan. The President then decided to drop the atomic bomb to end this war and quickly. The use of the atomic bomb on Japan was justified because it ended the war, was a better alternative than the others given, and helped save lives. The atomic bomb used on Japan was justified because it ended the war.

Read More

Was The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Justified Essay

498 Words | 2 Pages

It has been debated whether or not the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were justified ever since they were dropped. Some people think that the bombings were immoral and unnecessary, but it's important to think about why they were made. President Truman's approval of the bombs would result in the survival of American and Japanese lives and Japan's surrender.

Read More

Why Was Hiroshima Justified

1840 Words | 8 Pages

There are many reasons why it could be argued that the dropping of the atomic bomb was justified. One reason is that Japan was warned, they were given plenty of opportunities to surrender such as the Potsdam declaration. The Declaration was issued to Japan by President Truman and the Allies of America after America had tested the Atom bomb on July 26th. The declaration was a proposition of surrender to Japan that linked directly to the dropping of the atomic bomb.

Read More

Was The Cold War Justified

179 Words | 1 Pages

They felt that it would end the war a lot faster. The were to reduce the need of an invasion. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were partially justified because they did prevent the use of nuclear weapons in the Cold War, however, the death toll was unnecessary, and Japan was already defeated .

Read More

Hiroshima Bombing Argumentative Essay

797 Words | 4 Pages

The atomic bomb was a terrible thing. It killed 150,000 in Hiroshima and 75,000 in Nagasaki, plus many survivors became horribly disfigured from the intensive heat, and death from radiation is uncertain it may not kill the victims for days, weeks, months, or even years. (Although the bomb did save the USA from sending foot soldier to Japan, the Japanese were ready to surrender on terms that they can keep their empire and we had no need to use it). Japan was the first to feel the destructive power of the atomic bomb. Killing a quarter of a million people and costing two billion dollars of war replenish.

Read More

Essay On The Atomic Bomb On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

934 Words | 4 Pages

I think the United States should have not dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the atomic bombs was too expensive and it was not really worth it, they wiped out two entire cities, and Japan was planning on surrendering. The atomic bomb they used on Nagasaki cost 2 billion

Read More

More about Was Japanese Atomic Bombing Justified

Related Topics

Open Document