ipl-logo

Was Oj Simpson Guilty

778 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Dna and crime investigation

Tyler Calvert
Forensics
Mrs. Clark
29 January 2016
O.J. Simpson The criminal case of O.J. Simpson is one of the most famous court cases in the history of the United States. This case was formally known as the People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson. Simpson was tried on two counts of murder after the deaths of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown, and a waiter named Ronald Goldman. The case lasted eight months, which resulted in Simpson being ruled guilty for the murders. After analyzing the evidence provided in the case, I believe that O.J. Simpson was correctly found guilty of the murders of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman. The first piece of evidence that I think helps prove O.J. was guilty was the blood stains. These blood stains …show more content…

was guilty was the DNA evidence. DNA samples were taken from blood at the crime scene. These samples were compared to the blood of O.J. Simpson, Nicole Brown, and Ronald Goldman. The witnesses going against Simpson said that these DNA samples prove that he was linked to the murders. The witnesses defending Simpson said that the blood could have easily been planted as a part of a conspiracy against Simpson. I believe that the DNA was truly Simpson’s because I do not think someone would be skilled enough to get Simpson’s DNA and plant it. Therefore, I believe that this evidence supports Simpson’s guiltiness, rather than opposes …show more content…

During the case, Dr. Lakshmanan Sathyavagiswaran believed that the single-edged knife was the murder weapon that O.J. used. Simpson had purchased a single-edged knife prior to the murders of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman. When looking at it again, the doctor said he could not be sure. The most odd fact about the murder weapon is that is has yet to be recovered. I think this is another compelling piece of evidence that points to Simpson’s guilt. The fact that O.J. bought the same type of weapon that was used for the murders gives a pretty good conclusion that he is guilty. Another piece of evidence left at the crime scene was bloody shoeprints. William Bodziak, a shoe print specialist, said that the shoe prints were left by size twelve Bruno Magli shoes. O.J. Simpson wore size twelve shoes, which means the shoes definitely could have been his. The shoes have yet to be recovered, ironically, just like the knife. I think that the shoeprints point to O.J. as well because they fit him, and they magically disappeared just like the knife. Therefore, I think that the bloody shoeprints support that Simpson was

Show More
Related
445 Words | 2 Pages

The neighbor heard Nicole dogs was barking in crying while they were watching television, and they ran out and saw 2 bodies were found lying at the floor and the stairs. O.J Simpson went back home and got ready to leave to Chicago. The F.B.I forensic team came to the crime scene and also went to O.J Simpsons house as he was the primary suspect of the murder. F.B.I forensic manage to find numerous evidence where the strongest evidence were the footprint which on the blood and also the 3 blood DNA matches the DNA found on O.J Simpson gloves and also the fibre that were found in his hat. However the trial took place for a long period and at the end of the trial O.J Simpson was found innocent.

Read More
945 Words | 4 Pages

The cases of O.J. Simpson and Lizzie Borden are two court cases in American history that are 100 years apart, conversely are very parallel. On both occasions the verdict comes to be the same: not guilty. Circumstantial evidence, which is defined as evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion or fact, was heavily utilized in the process of prosecuting both subjects. Both Orenthal James Simpson and Lizzie Borden should be found guilty of murder due to the continuous number of things that prove their guilt.

Read More
1160 Words | 5 Pages

They also found that Kercher's DNA had not been present on the knife found at Soleccito's flat.(Amanda Knox 2). This proof implies that Knox and Sollecito cannot be guilty unless further investigation proves the previous claim wrong. There were many controversial evidences that turned out to be supporting that Knox is not guilty. The knife that was the supposed "murder weapon" had no blood on it, it didn't match any of the wounds made on Meredith's body, and the knife couldn't have made the bloody imprint that was on the bed. Forensic Scientists never stated that the luminal indicated that it was blood, nor was there any blood found in the apartment that connected the two to the murder, therefore this is also an unreliable source to use for the

Read More
1397 Words | 6 Pages

To begin, the bodies of Nicole Brown Simpson, O.J. Simpson’s ex-wife, and her friend Ronald Goldman were found by Nicole’s next door neighbor June 12, 1994 (Linder). The two were seen stabbed dozens of times and unfortunately discovered by the neighbor far too late. Additionally, the man assumed to be O.J. Simpson was seen entering his house not even an hour after the murders had taken place. Furthermore, when O.J. was told by police that his ex-wife had been killed, “Simpson did not ask how, when, or by whom” nor did he ask any follow up questions of any sort (Linder). After some additional questioning and evidence gathering, O.J. to be guilty, he had become a serious option for the suspect and a warrant was given out for his arrest.

Read More
670 Words | 3 Pages

The state's most compelling evidence is that of the coat, they found evidence of Mr. Rodgers DNA on the bottom of the coat. The problem with this is that the defense proved the point that if he had murdered Mr. Rodgers, then blood would have been all over the jacket, which there wasn’t. Equally important to point out is that they should have searched for shoes, and pants when they scoured his house. Considering they both should have had blood residue or particulates on them. They stated that he could have taken the jacket off, but it’s a suspicion.

Read More
1611 Words | 7 Pages

The types of evidence used to secure the case where the blood - which was tampered with - and the glove that "did not fit" his hand. O.J. Simpson used a leather glove when murdering the victims, but it did seem to fit his hand with a sanitary rubber glove providing a layer already on his hand in court(4). This case was widely publicized and many believed that O.J. Simpson was without a shadow of a doubt guilty. Against the sensible conclusion, the court ruled him not guilty, which caused an uproar. The case was taken to civil court, in which they found him guilty and the families of the victims received a fund of thirty-three and a half million dollars (4).

Read More
957 Words | 4 Pages

The day after the murder OJ Simpson had fresh cuts on his body (http://law2.umkc.edu/facility/porjects/ftrials/simspon/evidence.html). OJ Simpson acted really weird when the police called him to inform him about Nicole Brown’s death (http://law2.umkc.edu/facility/porjects/ftrials/simspon/evidence.html). Simpson tried and blamed another guy, which was his friend, named Charlie (http://law2.umkc.edu/facility/porjects/ftrials/Simpson/Simpson.htm). Investigators should have found more evidence at the crime scene, because everyone knew that OJ Simpson did kill his wife and her friend, Ronald

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

OJ Simpson was a very achieved person player until he made one big mistake. The trial of OJ Simpson was a long stressful process to prove a star innocent or guilty of murder. This took Place in the state of California on October 3, 1995. OJ was tried for a murder crime of his ex-wife and another man. In the end OJ turned out to be not guilty of this crime.

Read More
144 Words | 1 Pages

The evidence against Simpson (ex. The glove, suicide note, the crime scene itself) also shows how the judicial system

Read More
3029 Words | 13 Pages

25 Apr. 2017. User, Super. " The Trial of Orenthal James Simpson: An Account. "

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

There was multiply evidence that, traced back to O.J. Simpson. His blood was recovered and fingerprints were local on the back fence. Later they found his hair in a knit hat at the crime scene, which the same kind of fiber was found on Goldman’s clothing. Fibers from simpson’s car were also similar to the knit hat. In his vehicle, he had blood from both victims and a pair of bloody socks in his house, along with the right glove that was missing from the crime scene.

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

From an experts view, Marcia Clark is able to simplify some of the keys aspects involved with case throughout her book. Her novel admits to some of the faults involved with the Prosecution as they moved throughout the case. “Your Honor, at this time, the People would ask that Mr.Simpson step forward and try on the glove at Bundy as well as the glove recovered at Rockingham,” - Chris Darden (393). From his oblivious decision, Chris Darden was motivated into allowing O.J. to try on a match of the original gloves leading to then not fitting the suspect's hands. This then was a major incident which convinced the jury of O.J.’s innocence.

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

Another crucial piece of evidence is that the crime scene showed a major struggle so the murderer would have been severely bruised, and all OJ had on him was a

Read More
1033 Words | 5 Pages

The O.J. Simpson case was a different one because he was a celebrity. The celebrity status made all the difference in the case, as most people had diverse views on the case. As a famous individual, the media also had the chance to broadcast the trial and give differences of opinion on the case. The celebrity status had a significant influence in the O.J. Simpson case as the public had to struggle with an image he had created for many years. People knew O.J. Simpson as a footballer and an actor with a charming character impossible to hurt anyone.

Read More
1610 Words | 7 Pages

OJ Simpson is Indeed Innocent “If it doesn’t fit, you have to acquit,” this quote said by one of OJ Simpson’s attorneys, Johnny Cochran, is widely known for its impact on the controversial case of OJ Simpson. From 1994-1995 OJ Simpson was known as one of the most controversial cases in the USA due to the verdict that OJ was innocent of the murders of his ex wife and one of her friends. On June 12, 1994 Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman met an untimely demise, and the only suspect the police ever reviewed was OJ Simpson. OJ was later caught in a low speed chase in a white Ford Bronco before being taken into custody and put on trial. In the sensationally controversial court case involving OJ Simpson as a suspect for murder, The innocent ruling

Read More

More about Was Oj Simpson Guilty

Related Topics

Open Document