Was Pearl Harbor Bombing Necessary Essay

479 Words2 Pages

When people reflect on the events that occurred in WWII, they think of Pearl Harbor and the Holocaust. But people forget one important event, the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The U.S. was attacked on Pearl Harbor in December 1941 and the U.S. retaliated in their own way, bombing the cities in Japan. Many Americans say that the bombing was necessary, but some also say it wasn’t. Dropping the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was very necessary because it saved lives, sped up the war, and prevented future invasions. President Harry S. Truman wanted to save as many American lives as possible, so he loved the idea of bombing Japan. The attack on Pearl Harbor killed many Americans and Truman wanted to get revenge on Japan with atomic bombs. …show more content…

The atomic bomb was necessary to end the war with Japan at the earliest possible moment. By the early summer of 1945, Japanese leaders knew they could not win. But they fought on in hopes of securing better surrender terms.” (Walker xx.) Therefore, the atomic bomb was the prime focus in helping the U.S. attack Japan. While the U.S. and Japan are at high stakes, Europe is heating up. The U.S. couldn’t participate in both Japan’s attacks and Europe’s problems with Hitler at the same time. America needed an idea to get out of this situation, and there sat the atomic bomb. “By the time the atomic bombs were ready, the war had already ended with Nazi Germany. The war in the Pacific continued and many officials believed Americans would suffer great casualties if the United States invaded Japan by land.” (SHILLINGLAW, Kaylin, and Lindsey Long. “U. S. Atomic Bomb | Should the U.S. Have Used the Atomic Bomb against Japan?” If the U.S. didn’t drop the bomb, Europe’s problem could have spread to North America and could have caused more deaths and longer war