Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
The boston massacre facts essay
The boston massacre facts essay
The boston massacre facts essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The boston massacre facts essay
The boston massacre facts essay
The boston massacre facts essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The boston massacre facts essay
The evidence, from the 7 eyewitnesses, support that the colonists were the aggressors during the fateful evening of March 5, 1770, the Boston Massacre. Some cited evidence proves it. Number one, “I saw the people throw snowballs at the soldiers and saw a stick 3 feet long strike a soldier upon the right” (Theodore Bliss). In other terms they were assaulting the soldiers with pieces of snow or ice at them, afterward they hit one of them with a 3 foot club. This shows that the soldiers didn’t shoot to murder, they shot in self-defense.
In this event, the British soldiers clearly felt threatened and the colonists were instigating trying to pick a fight with them. Another reason that proves that the British are innocent is that Captain Preston was standing in front of his soldiers. In addition, there was a misfire which led to the start of the soldiers to shoot. They also fired because they believed that Captain
The colonists continued to protest the Townshend acts, so the governor asked Great Britain to send soldiers to the colonies. Great Britain had sent soldiers to the colonies to tighten their control on them. One of the violent protests was the Boston Massacre. In this event, an officer, gathering a group, struck a colonist. This group provoked the officers, leading to the death of five colonists.
According to Captain Thomas Preston in Document B, “On this, a general attack was made on the men by a great number of heavy clubs and snowballs being thrown at them.” This quote is a statement from the commander of the British squad on King Street, Boston. He explained that the colonists had been dangering the lives of the guards on duty. Since the purpose of the soldiers was to protect crown officials, the attack on the soldiers was an attempt to get past them and harm crown officials, which warrants their firing even if nobody gave an order. This evidence supports the colonists being responsible for the Boston Massacre because the British soldiers had a valid reason to shoot a colonist who is a threat to a British crown official or a British soldier, and colonists chucking heavy clubs and snowballs at soldiers were viewed as dangers to both the soldiers and the crown
A brutal slaughter of people for a minor action of anger? The Boston Massacre inspired and motivated the colonists to take a stand against the British to protect their rights. How can you blame them for wanting to break away from a system that kills their “own
The british kept victimizing the colonist and they finally provoked them and the tension bubbled into violence. The boston massacre had a result of five deaths which were all colonist. The reason
The Boston Massacre, which passage includes more evidence and support towards facts about the Massacre? Passage number 2 provides more evidence and support than the first passage. This doesn’t mean that the first passage doesn’t do good, this just means that the passage number 2 does a better job at explaining the stuff. Both of the passages give reasonsings for what the Massacre is, but passage 2 has a better and more appropriate explanation. Usually people say quality over quantity, but even though Passage 2 is longer, it still is the most efficient passage to go along with the Boston Massacre.
so he struck a colonist with the butt of his musket. This action, which caused the mob to grow larger, prompted more soldiers were sent to maintain control in the area. Angered, the mob grew larger and more violent. Eventually one of the colonists hit a soldier with a club.
Then the colonist made it seem that it was the soldiers fault by writing articles and drawing pictures. I know this because if you see the image that Paul Revere about the Boston Massacre it shows how the colonist are just standing there begging for mercy but it seems that the soldiers are being mischievous by killing the colonist. This picture was drawn by Paul Revere, this image was made in Boston. This supports my evidence because Paul Revere was in a group called “Our Sons of Liberty” which was against the British Government, so Paul made it seem like it was all the soldiers fault because they are shooting the “innocent” colonists. Many people saw this article and image so they decided to join the colonists side and they when against the soldiers by stop buying all British
The most deceptive selection offered was the article entitled, “Boston Massacre as Reported in the Boston Gazette”. This was the most deceptive primarily due to its title. A massacre generally refers to a mass indiscriminate killing of a large number of people. The article however describes the killing of only a few individuals. The article also fails to inform the reader of the events that led up to the onset of the killing.
The Boston Massacre is an event most Americans and British students learn about over the course of their education. In America, we learn that British soldiers fired upon innocent civilians, although this may not have been the case. British historians have referred to the Boston Massacre as the "Incident on King Street". After looking over the "Captain Thomas Preston 's Account of the Boston Massacre", as well as "Boston Massacre Trial Depositions" I believe that American historians should refer to the "Boston Massacre" as the "Incident on King Street". The definition of a massacre refers to an unnecessary and random killing of a large number of individuals.
The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a “patriot”. They were throwing sticks, snowballs, and trash at a group of British troops. The loyalists got very annoyed with the patriots so they shot into the mob killing five. The riot began when around 50 colonists attacked a British sentinel. A British officer called in for additional troops
The colonists began throwing snowballs and rocks at the troops. Suddenly, a single shot was heard and was followed by more shots. Five colonists were killed and many more were wounded. Two of the British soldiers were found guilty of killing the five colonists. They were punished
The British fought to defend themselves. They had no intentions of getting back at the colonists for their misdeeds. The colonists should also be held accountable for the first shot, because the British didn 't plan ahead to specifically target the colonists. Though, the Colonists purposely targeted the British. I believe
If the following events didn’t take place we wouldn’t have America. In my opinion the Boston Massacre was one of the very main causes to why the Road to Revolution took place. The reason I believe this was an important cause because it was, “ the first episode which resulted in the loss of life.” It is stated that, “Four Bostonians were killed when Redcoats fired into an angry mob.”