The Boston Massacre, which passage includes more evidence and support towards facts about the Massacre? Passage number 2 provides more evidence and support than the first passage. This doesn’t mean that the first passage doesn’t do good, this just means that the passage number 2 does a better job at explaining the stuff.
Both of the passages give reasonsings for what the Massacre is, but passage 2 has a better and more appropriate explanation. Usually people say quality over quantity, but even though Passage 2 is longer, it still is the most efficient passage to go along with the Boston Massacre.
So what is so special about Passage 2?Passage 2 gives a more effective, clean reasoning for what they’re trying to talk about. This passage gets so realistic in what's going on and everything! It gives us a longer and a more in depth explanation about the Boston Massacre. This passage provides lots of different parts of the Boston Massacre that the first passage doesn’t. Grammar can also play an important role in essays. Passage 2 uses stronger and more efficient words making it seem more realistic, appeared and in many more ways. Some examples of how this passage makes it seem better is, ‘’ A gush of smoke had overspread the scene, it rose heavily, as if it were loath or reveal the dreadful spectacle beneath it.
…show more content…
We’re not saying that passage 1 is bad and doesn’t state or say anything helpful, we’re saying that Passage 2 just has better quality than 1. Passage 1 has good evidence but Passage 2 has more in depth statings. Both of these passages provide good reasonings, but there will always be one better than another. And this is choosing passage 2 over 1!! Passage 1 doesn’t use any quotations such as when people are talking or acting in it like passage 2. Passage 2 uses many quotations for when people are talking and acting so it can give us a better feel and understanding of what's going on besides just stating it and going