More handpicked essays just for you.
Overview of the french revolution
Was the reign of terror justifyed.How valid is that
The background of the french revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Overview of the french revolution
Afraid that they would overthrow the revolution, many royal families, upper class, and lower class men were killed. The Reign of Terror The Reign of Terror was from September 5, 1793 to July 27, 1794 during the French Revolution. The Revolutionary government decided to take harsh measures against people they thought were against the Revolution.
The Reign of Terror was led by Maximilien Robespierre, he violently suppressed counter-revolutionary forces within and outside the country. Did the French government have good reason to conduct a violent campaign to uphold the ideals of the French Revolution? The Reign of Terror was justified because of three reasons: the revolutionary
The Reign of Terror In September 1793 to July 1794, the Reign of Terror killed over 40,000 people in France using the guillotine a machine that made it a simple way to execute a mass amount of people. The Reign of Terror was led by no other than , Robespierre. He was trying to form a new government but instead caused thousands of people to be massacred. Ultimately, The Reign of Terror in France was not justified because the threats did not require it, the methods were too extreme and It did not support the ideals of the revolution.
The Reign of Terror in France was not justified. This claim can be supported by looking at three areas: external threat, the internal threat, and the methods. The external threat was not enough to justify the Reign of Terror. One example of this is that “churches are soon closed by revolutionary government” which is wrong, because people should be able to choose what they believe in (Document A). Another example is that the “Government denies legal counsel to accused enemies of the revolution” (Document A).
With the changes seen in the economy, war & leaders, the Glorious Revolution of 1688 can be considered a part of the Enlightenment. Evidence shown through historical documents proves this stance. Although some historical events during the Glorious Revolution refute my stance, the Glorious Revolution was indeed a part of the Enlightenment because of the major shifts England had during and after this time period: Influencers, Religious tolerance and changes in governmental policies. Stated in the English Bill of Rights which were passed by Parliament and ratified by William III-King of England. “That the pretended power of suspending the laws or the execution of laws by royal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal”(Doc.3)
The colonists were justified in their rebellion, but not really right to say that England's actions were wrong. The British government caused the rebellion because they was taxing the colonists in ways haven’t done before and trying to control colonies more closely than ever. A country has rights to tax its people and enforce its laws, but no country would, stand by and let protesters destroy valuable merchandise.
Was the Reign of Terror justified? The Reign of Terror was one of the worst times in world history. This was a period of time when thousands of people were being executed for unfair reasons because of Robespierre- an absolute monarch who believed that torture and terror were required to have a strong constitutional law. The reign of terror was not justified because Enlightenment ideas were ignored, the rights of the common people were violated, and the methods of punishment were too harsh.
Was The Reign Of Terror Justified? The French Revolution was a very problematic time period. After the execution of Louis XVI, the Reign of Terror began during the years of 1793 - 1794 which was led by French politician, Maximilien Robespierre and lasted for 18 months. This topic is controversial when the question, “Was the Reign of Terror justified?” is asked.
On the other hand, in France, members of the Third Estate led a revolt against the monarchy in hopes that by overthrowing the monarchy, they would be granted a constitution and a new assembly would be created with delegates of the Third Estate. Although the radicals were successful and a National Assembly was created, there were still problems. The worsening economic issues had not been solved and many citizens did not gain any rights. When the Revolution took a radical turn in 1792, the French Republic was formed. Finally, in 1799, after the end of the Reign of Terror in which the monarchy and its allies were executed, the French Revolution came to an end, with Napoleon gaining power over France.
The 6th coalition should have executed Napoleon Bonaparte when they were provided a chance in 1814 because France would have become a constitutional monarchy, which would fix many problems that were left as a result of the French Revolution. On May 2, 1814, Louis XVIII “officially promised a constitutional monarchy, with a bicameral parliament, religious toleration, and constitutional rights for all citizens.” (Britannica.com) Louis XVIII stated that he would turn France into a constitutional monarchy and provide the people with various reforms. Since Napoleon came to France after the 6th coalition, Louis XVIII had to flee, and “the ultras exercised increasing control and thwarted most of Louis’s attempts to heal the wounds of the Revolution.”
Was Robespierre & the Radicals justified in their use of violence to create a better society? Robespierre and the Radicals were not justified in their use of violence to create a better society because it was not effective on the long run, killed many people and resulted in a worse government situation that emulated the government and equality rights of the Old Regime. During the Reign of Terror, Robespierre and the Radicals wanted everyone in France to have equal rights and support the non-monarch, republican democracy government. Robespierre and the Jacobins were completely against the Old Regime of France, estates unbalanced in rights and absolute monarchies.
Was the French Revolution preventable? This is a question that is fascinating to think about. What could have been done differently to prevent this revolution that cost countless people their lives? Why were others willing to give their lives, for what cause? Why was life so turbulent?
Held captive. Forced to do the unimaginable. Threatened. Beaten. Power.
Rebellion Against Government Many words are associated with the word “rebellion.” These words may include “disobedience,” “anarchy,” “instability,” or “teenagers.” A word that should be included in that group is “justified.” Throughout history, people have often been deprived of the rights and freedoms that they deserve as citizens.
This enormous massacre of people went against Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, all of which the national assembly declared were every man 's right. Much of the killing can be blamed on Robespierre and King Louis XVI. Although it was mostly a failure, some achievements can be seen through the Revolution. The French Revolution helped the French people become a more equal and socialist state. This showed Europe that the French were capable of revolting and they were not afraid to stand up for what they believed.
