ipl-logo

What Are Marx's Arguments Against The Working Class

409 Words2 Pages

Friere theories so far demonstrate an affinity with the working class and the struggles faced by those of the period; struggles such as hunger and poverty, affected by the tyranny of government oppression. Friere theories primarily attained influence from Marx (1818-1883) born in Prussia, a German theorist and revolutionary socialist who believed that all community property should be communally owned; Marx believed in the existence of class struggle, alienation, and finally revolution essentially undertaken by the ‘proleriatat’. Marx saw the exploitation of workers for the profiteering of capitalists as being the main oppressor in society rather than Freire’s theories of oppression from educative methods. In this instance, Marx theories do …show more content…

Marx saw the early technological rise as a possible collapse of capitalism, as well as the balance of power unfairly weighed against the working class. However, Marx is quick to point out that without the working class a capitalist society would inevitably collapse, bringing about economic and social change; suggesting communal ownership as a more equitable outcome. Marx believed that in time with the possible dissolve of capitalism, economics would evolve around communal ownership (Hall, Lieberman, 2007 p44). This is seen in modern society, through the application of technological advances for employment, education, and entertainment purposes, which may in the future disband the need for a human workforce. However, it is the same workforce that provides the capitalist with the purchase… it is therefore necessary for the workforce to maintain a level of humanisation seen through Freire’s methods of Dialogical conscientisation’ which are enhanced by Buber’s dialogical

Show More
Related

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

390 Words | 2 Pages

In the beginning of the 19th century, the Industrial Revolution caused a massive economic spike from small-scale production to large factories and mass production. Capitalism became the prevalent mode of the economy, which put all means of production in the hands of the bourgeoisie, or the upper class. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels argue that capitalism centralizes all the wealth and power in the bourgeoisie, despite the proletariat, or the working class, being the overwhelming majority of the population. The manufacturers would exploit the common proletariat and force them to would work in abysmal conditions and receive low wages, furthering the working class poverty. “The Communist Manifesto” predicts that as a result of the mistreatment

Read More

Conservatism Of Today's US White Working Class

1062 Words | 5 Pages

Men want to be “free and conscious producers.” (“The German Ideology”) By impeding man’s ability to realize his true desires, capitalism incentivizes the proletariat to demand change and make it happen. According to Marx and Engels, it is people’s ability to produce not solely to meet their needs, but as an end in and of itself that makes us truly human, and people will not rest until they reach their human potential.

Read More

The Themes Of Alienation In Estranged Labor By Karl Marx

1297 Words | 6 Pages

The premises presented by Karl Marx on his manuscript were genuinely with accord to the ordeal of the workers as they lose themselves in the hands of the capitalists. But, as we stated in the first part of this paper, we think there is a flaw in his second premise, the estrangement of the worker from the activity production. We believe that labor done by workers - explicitly those who take pleasure in doing their job- doesn’t necessarily imply that everything that they do is not out of their essential being primarily because they love what they do, and any work that is done out of passion and love comes from the essential being of a

Read More

Karl Marx Alienated Labor Analysis

814 Words | 4 Pages

Meanwhile, more technological advances, the more the laborer is devalued inciting displacement and more despairing modes of labor. Marx illustrates the disparity by stating that: Labor produces for the rich wonderful things – but for the worker it produces privation. It produces palaces – but for the worker, hovels. It produces beauty – but for the worker, deformity. It replaces labor by machines, but it throws one section of the workers back into barbarous types of labor

Read More

What Is The Effect Of The Industrial Revolution In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

1337 Words | 6 Pages

The Industrial Revolution cast its shadow upon European cities and towns. Some enjoyed this shade while others suffered tremendously because of it. Those who enjoyed the luxuries and wealth that the Industrial Revolution provided, the bourgeoisie, depended on the needs of the poor, the proletarians, to increase the size of their monstrous factories and ultimately their wealth and influence. In “The Communist Manifesto” Karl Marx discusses the effects of the Industrial Revolution in further dividing society by creating new social and economic hierarchies. In addition to his observation of the division of labor, Karl Marx believed, that due to the technological shift from craftsmanship to machinery this also caused division of labor and the appreciation of proletarian handmade goods was disregarded.

Read More

Wolf's Excerpt Of Europe And The People Without History

752 Words | 4 Pages

The second Marxian concept

Read More

Marx And Durkheim: A Comparative Analysis

908 Words | 4 Pages

Marx, through his communist manifesto, believed that “modern industry has converted the little workshop of the patriarchal master into the great factory of the industrial capitalist”, taking society from one epoch of social stratification and forced labour to Capitalism, under which the inequality between the Bourgeoisie and the Proletariat grew and became more evident. On the other hand, Durkheim saw industrialisation as a mainly positive occurrence which, along with the division of labour, provided the necessary institutions are in place to maintain it, as it causes society to change and develop and thus “civilization develops because it cannot fail to develop” (Durkheim: 1933: 337). Yet despite differences in their views of the effect, both Marx and Durkheim used the process of industrialisation to explain how society progresses and how society is held together or broken, with Durkheim, in particular, looking at just how much the structure of society changes as the division of labour progresses (Morrison:

Read More

Marx And Engels: The Three Main Ideas

759 Words | 4 Pages

He argues that with all the pressures of class conflict and the imbalance of capitalism there is no way that this pattern can continue without a major revolution. Marx compares capitalism to anarchy, in the sense that there is no organization within which only causes chaos. The common pattern of capitalism is a boom followed by a bust, and that bust leads to recession and social unrest. This sort of fickle economy, Marx believes, will furthermore contribute to the downfall of capitalism. This socialist revolution would, “abolish private ownership of key elements of economy and change nature of relationships from ones based on marriage and property.”

Read More

Struggle And Tension In The Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

451 Words | 2 Pages

All societies that progressed from primary structures are shaped by labor division. The labor of division, in Marx writing’s, means the separation of occupational sectors and workers into specialized spheres of activity which produces alienated labor and exploitation (Dillon, 2014, p.52). Exploitation of workforce and ideas of ruling class dominated in shaping societies is highly criticized in Marx’s writings. Exploitation refers to the condition of not receiving the full value of the goods to which you devote your labor (Davis-Sowers, August 30). Another characteristics is alienation which, Marx argues, is the commodification of labor power such that workers reduced to commodities.

Read More

Liberal Egalitarianism: The Marxian Theory Of Alienation

1989 Words | 8 Pages

Marx describes freely creative cooperative production (unalienated labour) as the sole ideal that humans should strive for in their existence, it is the essential foundation to our ‘species-being’, a term which Marx uses to describe what it fundamentally means to be human. Marx argues that what distinguishes us as human beings from other animals is our ability to freely produce in accordance with our will and consciousness in creative ways, other animals produce things, such as a spider spinning a web or a colony of ants building a mound but they cannot produce in unpredictable, progressive ways that humans can (Wolff, 2003: 34). Marx follows the Aristotelian belief that what distinguishes us as a species defines our good as a species, therefore, for a human being to achieve a perfect, fulfilled existence, free cooperative production and labour must be the pinnacle of importance and focus in our lives (Wartenberg, 1982: 80). In a capitalist system, however, workers use their labour merely as a means to an end, instead of making labour the locus of fulfillment, it is simply used a method of acquiring the necessary resources to engage in the very animal like activities we are trying to distinguish ourselves from, such as eating, sleeping, procreating and consuming. Marx is arguing that in a sense, we have prostituted our labour for the

Read More

Social Class In Communist Manifesto By Karl Marx

1362 Words | 6 Pages

Marx outlined the origins of class and social inequality in relations of production. The commodification of labour power in production and schooling in a capitalist society has been seen as the root of alienation. Historical materialism assigns primacy to forces of production in the social structure in a sense that social relations are considered by Marx as the major criterion for the social superstructure to transform. The social system is said to consist of a material base and a superstructure which is based on social consciousness and ideology based on dialectics. The education system that is a part of this superstructure has been transformed into a selection and training mechanism for a highly alienated and bureaucratized work.

Read More

Karl Marx And Emile Durkheim's Theory Of Capitalism

846 Words | 4 Pages

Capitalism is understood to be the “economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state.” In modern society, capitalism has become the dominant economic system and has become so integrated that it has resulted in a change in the relationships individuals have with other members of society and the materials within society. As a society, we have become alienated from other members of society and the materials that have become necessary to regulate ourselves within it, often materials that we ourselves, play a role in producing. Capitalism has resulted in a re-organization of societies, a more specialized and highly segmented division of labour one which maintains the status quo in society by alienating the individual. Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim theorize on how power is embodied within society and how it affects the individuals of society.

Read More

Marxism Exploits The Poor Working Class

880 Words | 4 Pages

It was a fascinating attempt to inculcate an economic framework that could be used to run a healthy society. However, this theory presumed ideal situations in some of its parts, and that it didn’t include the aspects of human alienation and human exploitation that were the results of unequal division of wealth. Even Marx himself pointed out numerous defects that prevailed in Classical Economics. Marx argued that the Classical economics undervalues the economic purpose of the working class. Classical economics keeping a blind-eye towards the dynamic human nature, proposes theories which are idealistic and ignore the exploitation of proletariat class and the empowerment of the bourgeois class.

Read More

Karl Marx Research Paper

971 Words | 4 Pages

Marx’s theory of human nature played a vital role in his critique of capitalism and communism. Marx believed that people were competitive and that their actions are directly influenced by the environment in which they live. “Marx's concept of a general "human nature" encompasses humankind's common material needs, as well as the potential for free development of intellectual, creative, and social needs and capacities. These needs form the limits of the capitalist mode of production, that is, the limits to exploitation.” [5] Marx also believed that the purpose of a capitalistic government was to protect the economic interest of the elite while exploiting the working class.

Read More

The History Of Class Conflicts In Karl Marx And Engels

764 Words | 4 Pages

Karl Marx’s class theory lies upon the premise that "the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles." He meant by this that ever since the inception of modern human society, people have been always divided into classes which are in conflict with each other due to class interests. An argument against class interests is that they are not given ab initio, they arise out of exposure of people occupying different social positions in varying social contexts. Karl Marx and Engels divided the masses into three broad classes, the proletariats, the petty bourgeoisie and the bourgeoisie.

Read More

More about What Are Marx's Arguments Against The Working Class

Related Topics

Open Document