What Are The Main Heroes Of The End Of Democratic Eastern Europe

1714 Words7 Pages

In moments of initial change in political power, people rise against their current authorities in order to achieve social justice and reformation. Such movements are created in instances of despair, moments of hopelessness, and suppression of basic human rights. From the French Revolution to the Velvet Revolutions in Eastern Europe, a people’s revolution has proven to be a very effective means of protest against an absolute government. When the communist in Eastern Europe came and took over, all rights and personal freedom of expression were abolished. Such leadership lead to revolutionary movements that helped shape what is now a Democratic Eastern Europe. With this said, the people of the east are the main heroes of the end of the Communist …show more content…

Suddenly, countries like Great Britain and the United States were becoming wealthier as production was able to be done at a faster rate. As a result, the Industrial Revolution resulted in the creation of two new classes, the Bourgeoisie and the Proliferate. The Bourgeoisie were known as the “middle class”, owners of businesses and factories who controlled productive property. The Proletariat on the other hand, were the workers behind the produced goods for the Bourgeoisie through their hard labor. The Proletariat were initially exploited by the Bourgeoisie as they paid the Proletariat less than the value of what they produced. This ultimately caused tension within both groups as the Bourgeoisie were abusing the Proliferate in terms of wages, safety, and social respect to gain further profit. Consequently, The Communist Manifesto was created by Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx to end such class distinctions due to this pressure. In Brown’s “The Rise and Fall of Communism,” he states that, “a new society would exist only in an international movement dedicated to the overthrow of capitalist systems and to the new society which would exist only in the future when Marx’s higher stage of socialism had been reached”. Communism was based on the ideas of a new social inequality in which would create a …show more content…

Without the massive collaboration of the resistance movements, nothing would have been accomplished. In order to obtain a sense of change or reform, something or someone has to inflict opposition and leadership towards the oppressor or ideology itself. Change does not happen overnight. Change takes time and dedication towards the given goal. A people’s revolution has proven to be a very effective means of protest against an absolute government because without people, there would be no government. In a democratic society, the people elect their representatives not the other way around. Revolution within Eastern Europe was based on the frustration of seeing one’s own government working against itself. Communism in paper seemed like the perfect alternative after Eastern Europe’s economic and physical status after WWII. But the reality was that the communist approach towards keeping power within its territory was to strip away culture, government, and the way of life of its inhabitants. The people’s only choice was to fight back through means of resistance. Whether it was the Polish, Hungarians, or Czechoslovakians, they all fought through means of protest and perseverance. Revolution did not take one attempt, it took several before it became effective. But overall, that is how revolutions work in the long run. When one attempt ends in failure, the next attempts