In the article, “There is no true History of the Westward Expansion,” Robert, Morgan justifies that average citizens were responsible for the western expansion. Morgan elaborates on the idea that their was “Heroes and Villains,” when it came to the exploration west. Morgan’s central idea is erroneous because the Indians weren’t trying to cause harm to the white men, when the Indians just wanted to pursue unity with the white men. Morgan claims that the average citizens were responsible for the exploration west is also erroneous because Jefferson was one of the main people that had contribution to the exploration west.
Paragraph 3: Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr are similar people but both live different lives. They both became orphans at a very young age. Alex was born on January 11, 1755 in Nevis. He was always energetic. Early on when Alex was young, James Hamilton Sr. left them.
Patrick Henry’s “Speech in the Virginia Convention” and Benjamin Franklin’s “Speech in the Convention”. They had many different viewpoints and some that were similar. Patrick Henry was an Anti-Federalist. He believed that compromises resulted in violence and he wanted us to fight for what we wanted.
The Many Theories Relating to John Smith and Pocahontas Everybody from generation after generation knows the story about how a man by the name of John Smith and a girl by the name of Pocahontas had a very important encounter in the late year of 1607. Unfortunately, too many people believe the one story about how Pocahontas laid over him just as he was about to get killed, and then fell in love with each other and moved backed to England. This is unfortunate because there are many different theories, myths, and evidence for what actually occurred between them, and that time era. Pocahontas was the daughter of Chief Powhatan who had one of the biggest tribes at that time. They lived in Chesapeake Bay, in the southern part of Virginia.
Tubman and Lincoln are both known for something important. In conclusion there are a lot of similarities between Lincoln and Tubman. Lincoln & Tubman also have a lot of differences. For example, when Lincoln made his famous speeches his facial expression would change, while Tubman’s expression would remain the same.
Thomas Jefferson was a Democratic-Republican. He strongly believed in a weak central government where the power was given to the states in order to preserve their rights and prevent a dictatorship. The best government in his opinion was the one that had the least input on people's decisions. Jefferson also had no intentions of expanding eastward. Rather, he believed that strengthening and expanding their borders at home should be the highest priority.
John Smith and William Bradford were both pioneers who created colonies. They both made a settlement and they endeavored to pull in pioneers with works. Their works were expected for distinctive groups of onlookers and they both had diverse purposes. John Smith's compositions were not the same as William Bradford's. John Smith had an alternate reason and his works were expected for an alternate group of onlookers.
Hamilton vs. Jefferson Visions to Reality Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton both had very defined visions of the scope and power of the new federal government, how they saw the future of the economic development, and what the United States society should become. In my opinion Alexander Hamilton had more of an impact on the United States during the 1820’s and on contemporary government when compared to Thomas Jefferson. His policies did not strictly work during that time and many of his ideas are still seen in today’s society. Jefferson’s views and ideas on/of the national bank, higher tariffs, debt assumption, The Federalist Party, and his support of the ratification of the Constitution are all reasons in why his policies and visions came closer to becoming a reality. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, molded the gatherings that provoked to the twofold party system under which the U.S. works today.
John Smith and William Bradford journeyed to uncharted lands with different intentions. Both men shared similar occurrences, but handled each situation with a different mean. Whether the intent was guided by hope of riches or religious freedom, the authors faced many hardships. The speech, objective, and mood deviate from and correspond to William and John’s accounts. William Bradford’s diction differed from Smith due to the theological beliefs that guided his writing.
Fredrick Douglas and Benjamin Franklin are both one of the most famous successful in American history. They both followed a certain milestone to make them successful. Even though they are considered hard workers, they both have different obstacles and different views in their lifestyle. Fredrick Douglas used to be a slave who was a fugitive and Benjamin Franklin was young white man who had a rough time with his parent because his parents are very abusive to him. By comparing the difference and similarities by these two great people in American history even though they had their rough times, that does not stop them from their success.
Thomas Jefferson and Thomas Paine are both considered to be founding fathers of the United States of America despite the fact that they both came from different backgrounds. Thomas Paine was born in Norfolk England, the son of Quaker and left school early to become his father’s apprentice. Thomas Jefferson was born in Colonial America in the colony of Virginia to a wealthy planter father and a mother from a distinguished family. He was given an extraordinary education and attended college earning a degree in law. As a young man Thomas Paine traveled in England constantly, working and pursuing many different ventures before emigrating to America in 1774.
Benjamin Franklin and His Enemies Summary Robert Middlekauff starts off by introducing Benjamin Franklin as a well-mannered and civic-minded individual who is loved by everyone. Of course, Benjamin Franklin was a little bit reserved when it came to strangers, but that never stopped people from growing fond of him. His good heart and spirit lead him to amazing people like Margaret Stevenson (Polly), John Adams, William Strahan, and Thomas Jefferson to name a few. Besides from having a well-liked personality Robert Middlekauff also reveals that Benjamin Franklin was a curious man who came equipped with an outstanding resumé.
Depending on where one falls on the political spectrum, Jefferson could either be at the top of all presidential polls, or he could be near the bottom. If a Jeffersonian was asked about Jefferson, he would sing his praises from the rooftops. Jefferson was the hero of the common man in that he ardently supported states' rights and an agrarian society. He also lowered the national debt by over twenty-five percent, doubled the size of the country with the Louisiana Purchase, and kept the nation out of a costly war with the old world. In the Jeffersonian's mind, there wasn't, and never would be, a greater president than Jefferson.
Both John Smith and William Bradford were Englishmen who came to America and helped to found the earliest colonies in New England. They came at different times and for different reasons. Both tell of events during these travels in their written accounts, but these accounts show that the two men, as well as their goals, were drastically different. Captain John Smith, considered to be the first American writer, came to America in the spring of 1607. He had many adventures prior to the voyage to New England, and thought quite highly of himself, as is clear in his writings.
The economic views of Adam Smith and Karl Marx Microeconomics Eduardo De Oliveira Superti Table of Contents: Abstract 3 Introduction 4 The economic views of Adam Smith 5 The economic views of Karl Marx 6 Adam Smith vs. Karl Marx 7 Examples in the world of today 9 Conclusion 10 Recommendations 11 Bibliography 12 Introduction Adam Smith and Karl Marx were completely contrasting economists throughout their time and had an enormous effect on the world and the way we view economics. They represent the ideas of capitalism and socialism.
