ipl-logo

What Do Social Psychologists Mean By Identity Summary

609 Words3 Pages

What do social psychologists mean by “identity”?
When social psychologists reference identity, they mean the part of a person’s self-concept that originates from his or her perception regarding participation in a given social group. Some social psychologists have argued that identity describes the value and emotional significance that an individual attaches to his or her membership of a particular group. Identity, therefore, develops along the border that separates groups, so that one can only discover his or her identity when he or she is content as part of a group membership or when they are able to associate and interact closely with a particular group.
According to Brewer, does liking our ingroup automatically mean disliking an out-group? …show more content…

She demonstrates that an individual can become attached to an in-group without necessarily developing hostility towards out-groups. Based on her findings, Brewer did not find any correlation between in-group identification of negative attitudes towards out-groups. In addition, she observed that the manifestation of preferential treatment of members of the in-group can result in inter-group discrimination and bias. The implication of this observation is that one can like an in-group without necessarily disliking out-groups.
What is an alternative to thinking this way? The alternative to Brewer’s thinking is that liking an in-group would automatically contribute to disliking out-groups. Social psychologists such as Sumner have argued that people tend to enhance their in-group positivity through social comparison of in-groups with out-groups. Social comparison enables individuals to identify outcomes and attributes of their in-group, which they perceive to be superior to other groups. The more people enhance their in-group positivity, the more they develop a dislike towards out-groups.
What does Brewer mean by “optimal

Show More
Related
635 Words | 3 Pages

Jane Elliot performed an experiment to show the manifestation of prejudice and its impact on social behavior. This experiment should how the out-group homogeneity effect will manifest itself and how it impacts behavior. Self-fulfilling prophecies influenced the behavior of the participants and fueled the stereotypes. Eliot used confirmation bias throughout the experiment to change the children's behavior. Through their behavior the children demonstrated the illusory correlation many times during the experiment.

Read More
514 Words | 3 Pages

In many ways we stereotype people based on their characteristics and tend to judge them in a positive and negative manner depending on, the different types of the out-groups we place them in. Such as envied out-group, pitied out-group and despised out-group. When we restrict interactions with out-groups. Dominant groups limit social interaction with out-groups which maintains group boundaries and limit access to out-group members. These limitations are useful, when the law is put out or unbreakable by spatial boundaries and physical segregation.

Read More
823 Words | 4 Pages

Another claim made by Tatum is that people’s perception of themselves are heavily impacted by the dominant group. In her essay she writes, “The dominant group holds the power and authority in society relative to the subordinates and determines how that power and authority may be acceptably used” (Tatum 3). She continues on to explain that dominant groups set the norm and when subordinate groups portray dominant traits it is set as an important part of their identity (Tatum 3).This is understandable as our uniqueness is often the focal point of our identities, if we carry a trait that is special among our group it will be a distinct part of our identity, even if that trait may be common within other

Read More
1618 Words | 7 Pages

From having not considered the actual meaning of identity and how it operates, to now having a deeper knowledge of the interplay between social and biological influences, I have exited the course with a new perspective of the term identity. Thus, the term identity need not embody a core explanation, rather, it should be defined as a space of

Read More
644 Words | 3 Pages

Project Three: Social Relations Prejudice as defined in the book Social Psychology by David Myers and Jean Twenge is “A preconceived negative judgement of a group and its individual members. (2019)” The textbook goes on to discuss how prejudice is often accompanied by stereotypes which are a “belief about the personal attitude of a group of people. (Myers & Twenge, 2019)” Stereotypes often make generalized or oversimplified assumptions that aren’t accurate.

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

In a country that promotes the ideas of grit, innovation, resourcefulness, and growth, I find it curious that American universities are still using standardized tests as an indicator of future success in college. Although standardized tests are only one factor in admissions to many colleges, they should not be used at all because they do not accurately predict the success of students in higher educational environments. Instead of using the SAT and ACT, admissions officers should put more weight on written essays, cumulative high school grade point average, extracurriculars, and letters of recommendation when deciding admissions. Although some may argue that the SAT and ACT offer a way of ranking students without factoring in grade point average, their ability to predict the future success of college students has not been demonstrated.

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

However, during the 1990s several influential commentaries suggested a conceivable move back to an accentuation on influence as central to intergroup attitudes, behavior, and relations. Eliot R. Smith has likewise proposed a hypothesis proposing that when bunch character is notable, the path in which individuals assess intergroup connections or connections produces specific emotions about out-gatherings, and it is these "social feelings" that constitute partiality and focus intergroup behavior. Research has additionally recommended that influence toward out-groups may be the most critical component of prejudiced attitudes. For example, in this video the affective component can be seen in the way people see and treat the blue eye people. They criticized and discriminate the blue eyes people.

Read More
1821 Words | 8 Pages

Albert Bandera argues that prejudice is not something people are born with. His theory describes how attitudes and values are learned, rather than something that has always been embodied. In Social Learning Theory: A Framework for Discrimination, Lizabeth Barclay argues that the theory mainly operates through two key areas. Association is the first of the two components. This is when individuals learn to connect a particular ethnic group with negative areas such as crime, violence, or poverty.

Read More
474 Words | 2 Pages

This shows the negative effects of the prejudices against

Read More
366 Words | 2 Pages

One psychological thing however, is that people tend to favor their own “group”, either animalistic or socially. In prejudice there are

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

What is Identity? Identity is like a fingerprint; it clearly determines who people are. Identity is something that people are not born with, it is an act people do that classifies their identity. People need to act upon their own choices to determine their own identity rather than being influenced by the choices of others. So, people must follow their own path in order to keep their own unique identity.

Read More
1463 Words | 6 Pages

(Wilson 2). According to Douglas Massey, there are two fundamental dimensions that define the conceptual space of social cognition- warmth and competence. In-group members are individuals that are perceived as warm and competent, or similar to. Individuals that lack warmth or competence are defined as members of out-groups. This is similar to the concept of racial oppression by J.W Wilson as the white people would view themselves as warm and competent, unlike the black people who would have been classed in the ‘out-group’ category.

Read More
1528 Words | 7 Pages

In his book titled The Nature of Prejudice, Allport wrote a chapter on the formation of in-groups. He writes, “As early as the age of five, a child is capable of understanding that he is a member of various groups. He is capable, for example, of a sense of ethnic identification. Until he is nine or ten he will not be able to understand just what his membership signifieshow, for example, Jews differ from gentiles or Quakers from Methodists, but he does not wait for this understanding before he develops fierce in-group loyalties (Allport, 1979). My experience, as a member of two religions, contradicts Allport’s findings.

Read More
1249 Words | 5 Pages

Thus, the outgroup bias includes negative categorizations, feelings, or ideas about people who are not part of our ingroup. Outgroup biases also mean the person associates more desirable and positive traits to their in-group members as opposed to out-group members. Individuals also tend to overestimate the similarities within groups and the dissimilarities between groups. That means the person sees the individuals in another group as being very alike (out-group homogeneity effect), but they see the differences between separate groups as being much greater than they actually are.

Read More
1210 Words | 5 Pages

It is a fluid concept and is constantly changing. Identity is a social construct which means that it is not something that as individuals are born with, however we create for ourselves as we grown in order for us and the people around us to understand us better. Identity can be situational – it can

Read More

More about What Do Social Psychologists Mean By Identity Summary

Related Topics

Open Document