ipl-logo

What Does Descartes Mean To Me

1001 Words5 Pages

Descartes: You ask what you are, yet you fail to comprehend that to know of something is to know it without a doubt. Focus on something that is clearer to you than yourself. Davies: You say I should find clarity outside of myself, but this seems impossible when all I know is that I am thinking. Is it not appropriate to feel sceptical of everything else?

Descartes: You must allow yourself freedom from this radical doubt. You know that you think and that you exist. Turn your attention to the external world and investigate a corporeal substance to feel more clarity within yourself. Take this for example, tell me what you see.

Davies: An ice cube.

Descartes: Nonsense. You think you know this ‘ice cube’ but you are mistaken. Describe it. …show more content…

Descartes: You may know it by another name, but you cannot deny that this is not the same ice as before. Its identity remains. Nothing suggests itself my friend. You cannot say that an object is anything. The ice was not bound to any of these qualities. Ask yourself the question of what it has, it’s true and immutable nature (REF 1), as the ice was merely a body that presented itself to you as one thing and is now another.

Hobbes: You cannot possibly say that nothing suggests itself, for you know more of an object when you observe it! The ice’s sensory qualities are the presupposition to all understanding, dare you say that there exist conceptions in your mind that have not been begotten upon, totally or partly, by the sense (reference)

Descartes: Do not misunderstand me. I do not say that the senses are entirely useless in my perception, all I infer is that they cannot provide a distinct understanding of the ice (reference Med). You are predisposed to judge that your senses tell you all that there is to know, alas we know they cannot always be trusted. Withdraw your commitment from the ice being its sensible qualities for that is all it was seeming to be, everything has now …show more content…

To understand is to compare phantasms and differentiate their likeness and unlikeness (ref2.1). These phantasms pass in the train of imaginations and the judgement of their differences comes from memory (2.1, ref2).

Davies: I cannot entertain that the faculty of understanding exists within that of imagination. Have we not discussed that the imagination, as powerful as it may be, cannot depict all possible changes of the ice? This indubitability overwhelms me and I cannot consider your objection true. There is a great difference between imagining and conceiving in the mind, so I shall consider them to be separate faculties. For I can envision an existence deprived of the ability to sense or imagine but cannot comprehend myself independent of the intellect. This faculty endures insofar as I am a thinking thing!

Descartes: Exactly. The imagination lacks the faculty of judgement (reference). You may have sensory memories of the ice, but they represent only what was seeming to be so. The intellect allows you to vividly concentrate on what the ice consists in. It allows you to penetrate outward forms to contemplate their inner constitution (reference

Show More
Related
126 Words | 1 Pages

The author uses this objection as an example to prove that Descartes’s idea of the mind and body existing without each because he imagines It, is wrong. Visualizing is not a very dependable way of proving something

Read More
723 Words | 3 Pages

Descartes then attempts to define what he is. He previously believed that he had a spirit and body, by methods for which he was fed, moved, could sense, absorb space, had a distinct area and think. Each one of those methods are thrown into uncertainty except thinking. Since he can think, he should exist. He thinks about whether he no longer exists once his reasoning comes to a halt.

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

Descartes believes that certain things, such as size/shape, number/quantity, and a duration of time are clear ideas. They are qualities of an object that an object possesses that are not subjective to the observer- they are clearly objective and do not change. Other things are more subjective- such as colour (changes according to

Read More
1654 Words | 7 Pages

Notre Dame ID: 902008117 In René Descartes ' Mediations on First Philosophy, Descartes abandons all previous notions or things that he holds to be true and attempts to reason through his beliefs to find the things that he can truly know without a doubt. In his first two meditations Descartes comes to the conclusion that all that he can truly know is that he exists, and that he is a thinking being. In his third meditation, Descartes concludes that he came to know his existence, and the fact that he is a thinking being, from his clear and distinct perception of these two facts. Descartes then argues that if his clear and distinct perception would turn out to be false, then his clear and distinct perception that he was a thinking being would not have been enough to make him certain of it (Blanchette).

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

We know clear and distinct perceptions independently by God, and his existence provides us with a certainty we might not possess otherwise. However, another possible strategy would be to change Gods role in Descartes philosophy. Instead of seeing God as the validation of clear and distinct perceptions, rather see him as a safeguard against doubt. This strategy, however, is a problem since it re-constructs the Meditations – Philosophical work of Descartes –.This is because it would not be God, who is the ultimate foundation of knowledge, but the clear and distinct

Read More
172 Words | 1 Pages

Descartes, in his Meditations on First Philosophy, used a method of doubt; he doubted everything in order to find something conclusive, which he thought, would be certain knowledge. He found that he could doubt everything, expect that he was thinking, as doubting is a type of thinking. Since thinking requires a thinker, he knew he must exist. According to Descartes if you are able to doubt your existence, then it must mean that you exist, hence his famous statement cogito ergo sum which is translated into ‘I think, therefore I am.’ Descartes said he was able to doubt the existence of his body and all physical things, but he could not doubt that his mind exists.

Read More
1238 Words | 5 Pages

Having asserted with absolute certainty his existence, Descartes attempted to remove the basis for doubting, a deceiving God, by first classifying in the Third Meditation which category of thoughts would be susceptible to doubt. Descartes divided thoughts into three categories: imagery, volitions and judgments, of which the third category could be most erroneous since judgment could lead to false ideas, a problem which could be resolved by considering them different modes of thoughts. These ideas could be further divided into three categories - innate, produced by one or adventitious. The last category was of particular importance: in term of representation, these ideas conveyed different degree of objective reality with omnipotent deities

Read More
723 Words | 3 Pages

Descartes completes this chapter determining that perceiving is not possible without a mind, the mind’s existence is definite, and most importantly the mind and body are two separate and distinct

Read More
1919 Words | 8 Pages

Conclusion: The mind is substantively different from the body and indeed matter in general. Because in this conception the mind is substantively distinct from the body it becomes plausible for us to doubt the intuitive connection between mind and body. Indeed there are many aspects of the external world that do not appear to have minds and yet appear none the less real in spite of this for example mountains, sticks or lamps, given this we can begin to rationalize that perhaps minds can exist without bodies, and we only lack the capacity to perceive them.

Read More
1520 Words | 7 Pages

Thus, he argues that a body can exist without thought, since thinking is not in the essence of a body. As

Read More
507 Words | 3 Pages

Descartes believes that everything he has learned in his life is false. In the third meditation, Descartes focuses on his beliefs in ideas, imagination and the existence of God. He wants to see if he is capable of finding more of himself that he has not noticed before. Even though he might find more of himself, he is not sure if it is true or false. He got rid of all of his images and said that they are all empty, false and worthless.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

It embodies the insight that there is a serious muddle at the centre of the whole of Descartes theory of knowledge. He says that we do not hold a clear idea of the mind to make out much. ‘He thinks that although we have knowledge through the idea of body, we know the mind “only through consciousness, and because of this, our knowledge of it is imperfect” (3–2.7, OCM 1:451; LO 237). Knowledge through ideas is superior because it involves direct access to the “blueprints” for creation in the divine understanding, whereas in consciousness we are employing our own weak cognitive resources that

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

He furthermore explains that sense experience is somehow misleading through the allegory of the cave by implying that “what we feel and see might not be the truth”. He claims that our souls go through the process of recollection from the realm of forms. He believes that true knowledge is gained only through reason and philosophical reflection. However, Aristotle holds another view, he believes that change is genuine and in the importance of sense experience and observation. He emphasizes that sensible objects are what makes up the real world and each material object has existence of its own.

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

This is meant to explain the autonomy of the human mind or intellect in perceiving things in our external surroundings. According to Descartes, the wax argument follows that when the wax is freshly obtained from the honeycombs, the basic sensory abilities of touch, smell, as well as taste can effectively be used to identify wax from any other matter. He makes a comparison of the melting to the wax with the mind of the

Read More
714 Words | 3 Pages

Is competition good or bad? While most students in schools think it is good, I disagree with them. I believe competition is bad. Many students around the world are overly competitive. This can have many negative effects on them and the other students they are competing against.

Read More

More about What Does Descartes Mean To Me

Related Topics

Open Document