ipl-logo

'What Does The Term Synoptic Problem' Refer?

694 Words3 Pages

What are the Synoptic Gospels and to what does the term “Synoptic Problem” refer? Are there really any problems with the Synoptic Gospels? Do the differences found in the Synoptic Gospels present a threat to their validity for understanding the ministry and teachings of Jesus Christ or the historical events concerning his life and resurrection?

According to the Rethinking the Synoptic Problem text book the Synoptic Gospels refers to the first three books of the Bible; Mathew, Mark, and Luke and how they are similar in wording, but often with independency of Jesus stories. In the same way, the Synoptic Problem refers to “the question of the written sources of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, and the literary interrelationship of these three Gospels.”1 …show more content…

These challenges, though they were eventually overcome by some great theologians, did presents a considerable problem during this generation. However, to acknowledge that God is the only one who can really give us a perfect answer is a big step to move forward to discussions that matters most such as the Salvation of souls. Besides, the point of the story is that he is the one who choose not to give us a perfect answer; at least not yet. In fact, nobody has a perfect solution to the Synoptic Problem, yet there are several factors that we need to worry more that hinders and complicates in order to move forward; to which is answer by a simple question: are you willing to humble yourself before the Lord to not compromise the word of God, and believe his independency. One can only answer that question; ultimately one has to respond to God, because the answer is not only going to determine how joyful you are in Christ, even more, is going to determine how effective your faith is with …show more content…

The second term Literary Independence is defined as having “no literary relationship between the four Gospels.”3 It originated from the early Synoptic Problem from the Augustinian theory. Next, “the view that Mark wrote first and was used by the other two synoptic writers is called Markan priority.”4 This view was originated by Streeter. Matthean Priority puts “Matthew being the first Gospel, with Luke using him as a source and Mark using both,”5 and originated by Dugan. Finally, the Two Gospel Hypothesis views Matthew as the source for Luke and Mark, the Luke depends from Matthew and is the source for Mark, and lastly that Mark depends on Mathew and Luke. This is a redefined view from

Show More
Related
605 Words | 3 Pages

Also the version of Jesus presented in the Synoptic Gospels is different from the Gospel of John. He speaks very little about himself; he is focused on the coming of the Kingdom of God. Prior to this unit I considered all the Gospels to

Read More
654 Words | 3 Pages

Q1. According to tradition, who wrote the Gospel of Mark? Why are modern scholars unable to verify that tradition? What themes in the Gospel suggest that it was composed after the Jewish Revolt against Rome had already begun?

Read More
299 Words | 2 Pages

In general, Burridge 's book, “Four Gospels one Jesus? Was and excellent volume to have read, it was definitely an excellent introduction to the theology and literary style of the gospels. It is filled with an extraordinary simplicity as well as profound content. On another note, the lack of Greek syntax and a much contemporary approach was somewhat refreshing. Burridge avoids technical terminology and if a Greek term is used, he carefully explains it thoroughly.

Read More
1718 Words | 7 Pages

Literary – The books are all consecutive and they are the last chapters of the gospel of John. The

Read More
280 Words | 2 Pages

The Gospels are a written account of the life of Jesus Christ and the ministry that he poured out onto the earth for the people and the glory of God. Each Gospel has its own author, yet it all derives out of Christ. All the authors come from different places, so they all see the life of Jesus different, which comes out in how they wrote their Gospel. The Gospel of Matthew was written by a Jew hired by Rome to be a tax collector.

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Mark, who wrote as a pastor, spoke the gospel to Christians who previously had heard and believed the Gospel of Jesus Christ. He demonstrated an authentic story of Jesus Christ as Servant of the Lord and Savior and of the world hence strengthening their faith. Mark’s gospel is distinctive because it highlights Jesus’ acts more than His teaching; straightforwardly written, it moves from one part to the next of Christ’s life. Moreover, Mark’s gospel is a thorough written account to validate that Jesus is the Messiah, for Gentiles as well as the Jews.

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

Haley Matney CHS 121-05 Fella Wilson September 29,2016 Comparison of the Gospels The four Gospels: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, all hold many similarities, however many differences at the same time. The Gospels were written for a particularly audience and with a certain theme. They were all written with a certain purpose and God utilized their work into a final form.

Read More
485 Words | 2 Pages

The four gospels work together to create a picture of Jesus’ life, in general they are able to complement each other despite different goals of the authors. As the authors are intentional about including specific details they are able to direct attention of the audience to various points in the gospels to promote a theological purpose. However in the eyes of some readers the creative liberty that the authors take seem to be contradictory to each separate gospel. These disparities between the gospels become especially clear when all four gospel writers include the same story. One of the most prominent examples of this is found in the accounts of the Anointing at Bethany; making an appearance in all four gospels the accounts contain the same sequence of events but different details that emphasize different points to the readers.

Read More
680 Words | 3 Pages

Immediately students of the Gospels will recognize the wording has impressive similarities in three of the four Gospels. Thus they are called Synoptic (συνοπτική) meaning “seen together” Observing the exercise this week students will find particular likeness in the Gospels of Matthew 12:9-14, Mark 3:1-6, and Luke 6:6-11 which immediately causes them to take into consideration if each author of the Synoptic based there material from the same source. Moreover, did Luke and Mark gather their work form Matthew or did Matthew and Mark utilize Luke’s encounters for their writings.

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

Secondly, the literary issues in the gospel of John are that Fernado Segovia has written on the Entrée into Johannine Reality is that a close study of the opening narrative of the prologue of the gospel (John 1: 1 – 18) seems to identify the ideological thrust of the gospel and draw out ramification. He builds on a careful literary analysis; he sets out to read the prologue as an ideological product. He shows that prologue constructs two worlds, the “other-world” and “this-world.” The other-world belongs to foundational time and space and consists of two figures: “God” and the “world.” It is male dominated because these two figures are designated Father and Son.

Read More
165 Words | 1 Pages

The term "synoptic" is a cross of the prefix "syn" which means "one" and the word "optic" which refers to "seeing." In this sense the term "synoptic" means "together with one view.” They are called the synoptic gospels because of their similarities. They tell the story of Jesus life, death and resurrection. The

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

In his book “the Republic”, the Greek philosopher and mathematician Plato (348/347 BCE) attempts to define justice, the order and character of the just-state and the just man. In “the Republic”, Plato represents his thoughts along with the thoughts of various other Athenian philosophers; one of significance is his precursor and mentor the classical Greek philosopher Socrates. See figure 1. The book contains discussions concerning the meaning of justice and examinations in regards to the pursuit of goodness and weather or not the just man is happier than the unjust man.

Read More
1755 Words | 8 Pages

Therefore, the theory has to be expanded with an account of the double tradition, which proponents of the two-source theory explain by stating that Matthew and Luke used

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

Everyone knows the gospels are very important to the Catholic Church, But why? We read them at mass every Sunday so they must have a deeper meaning. Well that’s just it. They teach about Jesus’ life on earth, his death and resurrection. They might differ from each other but that is because they were written by four different authors.

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

I am aware of the gospels that we have which are Mark, Matthew, John, and Luke, but just like the manner of how God reveals himself in other religions outside Christianity, the other divisions of the gospels came across as a another shocker for me. Although I am aware of the Gnostic Gospel of Mary Magdalene, but that is merely because of the film The Da Vinci Code, and I did not really know the entire extent of the Gnostic Gospels, which further escalated my curiosity for this topic. Anyhow, I believe by having these kind of divisions for the Gospel is good, because it helps people know and understand the truth about our faith. The way I see it, if the Gnostic Gospels were not classified as it is then there would be disunity and confusion around us in our religion. If it were not for the Canonical Gospels, the official gospels of the bible as they were written out of devotional and evangelical purpose, no one would be then certain of what our faith is really about and who Jesus Christ truly is to us.

Read More

More about 'What Does The Term Synoptic Problem' Refer?

Related Topics

Open Document