ipl-logo

What Is Amia Srinivasan Utilitarianism

1097 Words5 Pages

Utilitarianism as an Unrealistic Utopia As an optimistic individual the concept of utilitarianism is one I support, however, I am not naive enough to believe it is a realistic possibility. The biggest criticism of utilitarianism is that it is very demanding of people, which is undoubtedly true as even the saintliest of us mortal beings cannot please the philosophy. Amia Srinivasan’s belief that utilitarianism asks of “the wrong things [...] that constitute us as humans” (Srinivasan 8) is a logical and sound objection, as often times, we humans tend to be unpredictable and selfish in our wants and needs. This is not to say that we do not all on some level wish for the ultimate happiness of everyone, but it does suggest that happiness for all is not a realistic possibility, as we do not live in a utopic world with perfect people. The whole point of utilitarianism is that our actions are meant to benefit the whole in a positive way; ideally in respect to happiness and quality of life. Srinivasan’s objection is representative of a flaw in the philosophy as it calls utilitarians out for their utopic ideas that have no accommodations for “personal attachments, loyalties and identifications” (Srinivasan 8) …show more content…

The fact that none of these are considered as factors that can influence one’s ability to conform to utilitarianism reveals a weakness in the logic and makes it impossible for any individual to obey and

Show More
Related
807 Words | 4 Pages

Williams reason in criticizing utilitarianism is because of their insensibility to recognize self-morality, self-dignity, personal commitment, and understanding the importance of integrity. One of the main leading factors in Williams disagreement towards the idea of

Read More
1325 Words | 6 Pages

The context of the paper is discussion of why utilitarianism is consistently appealing. As Foot

Read More
1217 Words | 5 Pages

Neither act or rule utilitarianism is broad enough to fit every moral decision into their theory. Consequently, utilitarianism in general is

Read More
1565 Words | 7 Pages

Bernard Williams’ essay, A Critique of Utilitarianism, launches a rather scathing criticism of J. J. C. Smart’s, An Outline of a System of Utilitarian ethics. Even though Williams claims his essay is not a direct response to Smart’s paper, the manner in which he constantly refers to Smart’s work indicates that Smart’s version of Utilitarianism, referred to as act-Utilitarianism, is the main focus of Williams’ critique. Smart illustrates the distinction between act-Utilitarianism and rule-Utilitarianism early on in his work. He says that act-Utilitarianism is the idea that the rightness of an action depends on the total goodness of an action’s consequences.

Read More
928 Words | 4 Pages

Utilitarianism is a framework that helps the individual in living a fulfilled and good life. The reason for this can be based on Aristotle’s theory of eudaimonia. He believed that, for an individual to achieve a good life, they must first be

Read More
1010 Words | 5 Pages

A number of problems surround the second question; the most obvious of which are limited time, the limited capacity of human foresight to calculate the maximum number of happiness, and the inability of the theory to advise on the time frame utilitarianism is to be applied to; how do you know the maximum number of happiness for the next 10 years doesn’t mean greater overall unhappiness in the next 50 years, so what time period should one keep in mind when considering an issue from a utilitarian stand point, 1 year, 5 years, 10, 20? This lack of clarity further adds to the impractical nature of the ideology. There are a myriad number of situations which seem very difficult to resolve without employing utilitarian principles and a very good example is the widespread use of utilitarian principles in bioethics. The best example here would obviously be the famous case of the conjoined twins Mary and Jodie. The facts in front of the court indicated that Mary was the parasitic twin who shared a heart with Jodie.

Read More
1218 Words | 5 Pages

The main principle of utilitarianism is happiness. People who follow this theory strive to fulfill the “ultimate good”. The “ultimate good” is defined as ultimate pleasure with out any pain. It is said that the pleasure can be of any quantity and any quality, but pleasures that are weighted more important are put at a higher level than others that are below it. This ethical theory also states that if society would fully embrace utilitarianism then people would naturally realize their moral standing in the

Read More
973 Words | 4 Pages

simply because we are all rational individuals capable of reasoning? Morality should not therefore be something we can calculate by merely weighing costs and benefits. An objection towards utilitarianism is therefore the failure to consider the separateness of persons thus individual rights. To utilitarians, the only importance of a person is the way that he can contribute towards achieving utility in a community. This means that utilitarianism fails to

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

To use preference utilitarianism to make ethical decisions, would require us to look at and weigh the preferences of all of these beings involved in the situation, not just our own personal interests. However,

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

A man by the name of John Stuart Mill seems to be able to give us some answers to these questions. Mill starts our inquiring journey with defining what utilitarianism stands for. In short he states that it is the construction of utility, which claims that the actions that stimulate happiness in is morally fit and vice versa to be unfit. Happiness is something that we want for

Read More
859 Words | 4 Pages

It cannot account for social justice and other human rights. Since utilitarianism

Read More
1564 Words | 7 Pages

Utilitarian suggest that we make our moral decisions from the position of a benevolent, disinterested spectator. Rather than thinking about

Read More
1711 Words | 7 Pages

Commonly, ethical systems are categorized into two major systems. The deontological approaches or normative ethical position which judges an action based on the adherence of the action to certain rules and the teleological approaches which judges primarily based on the consequences of an action (Hare, 1964). The Utilitarianism is assigned to the teleological approaches, as it does not evaluate an action by itself but by it’s

Read More
1515 Words | 7 Pages

Humans are rational beings by nature. However, in all reality, we are also selfish beings, where the majority of people want the most good for themselves and then later consider the needs of others. Utilitarianism involves a higher incidence of making circumstantial especially personal exemptions and a higher chance of promoting selfish gains. Often times, people use others merely as stepping stones, so that they can first succeed. Far too often the mentality of members of society stems from the idea of after I am personally successful, then I will donate to the poor and do more charitable deeds, yet at this current time I need to focus on myself, not others.

Read More
1239 Words | 5 Pages

The utilitarianism is common approach to make ethical decisions. The main point of this approach is that you have to make that decision which comes with the most utility. The utility in this approach can be described as „The good”, and the opposite of this is „the bad”. This means that in Computer Science you have to produce a computer programme or a hardware, which produces the largest amount of good , and during the producing phase, it makes the least amount of bad, for all who are affected: customers, employees, and even the enviroment. With the utilitarian viewpoint people can make right, and ethical decisions, for instance if you produce a programme which can make life easier for millions of people, you should not sell it for extremly

Read More

More about What Is Amia Srinivasan Utilitarianism

Related Topics

Open Document