ipl-logo

What Is The Law Code Of Hammurabi Dbq

477 Words2 Pages

The Document “The Law Code of Hammurabi” we are given a reading of a list of what laws were for Mesopotamians. The document informs us, the readers, know the two hundred and two seven written laws are consider as the most informative about life in Mesopotamia in regards of justice and social regulation concepts. According to the document The Law Code of Hammurabi basic principles of justice, punishment and compensation in Ancient Mesopotamia don’t act appropriate are most likely lead to be killed if they cannot prove their innocents. One example of how they handle common crimes is the first law “if a man accuses another man and charges him with homicide but cannot bring proof against him, his accuser shall be killed” (25). Not only can someone accuse you …show more content…

and how it involves their gods and beliefs. To my understanding as a reader in Mesopotamia the Hammurabi is the king and it’s up to him to make sure the gods are respected, to make justice prevail and abolish the wicked and the evil and among other things to make sure the sun god, Shamash, is above humankind. If one takes from the gods, the palace or disrespect those above them will be sentence to death and shall be killed. The sixth law, “if a man steals valuables belonging to the god or to the palace, that man shall be killed” (25) is an example of those who disrespect their higher being. It also makes it clear slaves are not to be pitied, if you are caught helping the slave escaping out of the main city gates you will be killed. There are many other familiar laws addressing slaves makes me believe slaves were property and it is looked as thievery. An example of this is the fifteenth law, “if a man should enable a palace slave, a palace slave woman, a commoner’s slave, or a comer’s slave woman to through the main city-gate, he shall be killed”

Show More
Related
841 Words | 4 Pages

My evidence is the law 's 23, 48, 53, and 54 from document d. Law 23 is : If the robber is not caught, the man who has been robbed shall formally declared whatever he has lost before a god, and the city and the mayor in whose territory or district the robbery has been committed shall replace for him whatever he has lost. This law is fair because nobody is willing to confess to what they did so they will all in a way be paying for the object (through taxes) it teaches the society that you are all one not an individual that controls the entire thing. Law 48 also proves that Hammurabi 's code was just. Law 48 is: If a man has borrowed money to plant his fields and a storm has flooded his field or carried away the crop,... in that year he does not have to pay his creditor. If you were to put the law into perspective such as that you lost all your money but you owed someone thousands of dollars, but how you lost the money couldn’t be controlled by you would you think it was fair if you had to pay the money back to the other person that year?

Read More
153 Words | 1 Pages

The Hebrew Law was based on commandments. While in the Hammurabi 's Code if they did not have money than you were just consider a slave. But both Hammurabi 's Code and the Hebrew Law dealt with the social

Read More
1138 Words | 5 Pages

The Judgments of Hammurabi are a set of laws that were written by a god. The laws were put in place “to promote the welfare of the people, to cause justice to prevail in the land, and so the strong might not oppress the weak.” The Tale of The Eloquent Peasant, depicts how a peasant has been robbed of his goods and how he eloquently appeals to the king for justice to be served. Both articles discuss; the division of a society’s social class, how gods/kings interpret justice and family relationships within the law. The Judgments of Hammurabi laid out the rules for Mesopotamian citizens.

Read More
103 Words | 1 Pages

These examples show that Hammurabi's code was unjust because this law was a very extreme law for just cheating on her husband. Instead what I think what should happen is that the man should just disinherit her instead of drowning her and the man she was cheating with.because what is happening you're just losing people and I don’t think want to join this empire if these laws are so extreme. And if your son hits you and get his chopped that is really extreme punishment but what if the son is just a little boy playing with his father or upset at him.

Read More
457 Words | 2 Pages

Here are some of the laws Hammurabi created. (“If the son has done some great evil to his father, his father must forgive him the first time. But if he has done something evil twice, his father can throw him out. If a man cuts down a tree on someone else 's land, he will pay for it. If a doctor operates on a patient and the patient dies, the doctor’s hand will be cut off.”)

Read More
642 Words | 3 Pages

HAMMURABI'S LAW CODE Paragraph 1- Intro “If a son has struck his father, his hands shall be cut off” Law 195. This is one of Hammurabi's laws, a Babylonian king from 4,000 years ago. Not only were his laws unfair, but they were violent and affected about 1,000,000 people. Hammurabi wrote these laws on a stone stele, there are 282 laws.

Read More
164 Words | 1 Pages

Fidelity was something Mesopotamians valued heavily in their culture. As such, Hammurabi’s Laws covers the act of infidelity, however it is clear that the laws favor men and implements harsh penalties for women. If a woman were caught being adulterous, then she and the man she slept with were both tied up and thrown into water to drown. In contrast to a woman, a man was only put to death if he is caught having violating a virgin who was betrothed to another man. Although Hammurabi’s stand against unfaithfulness can be seen commendable, the assigned punitive measures to those who commit adultery were prejudiced and biased.

Read More
1001 Words | 5 Pages

Before King Hammurabi implemented the code people there was never an idea on what was right or wrong to do in society. The morals that he was promoting were harsh. The death penalty is listed as a punishment at least 20 times if not more. The laws called for death, even for nonviolent crimes. Entirely innocent people were killed.

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

Hammurabi’s code was not just because the personal injury laws did not protect all people equally, property laws were harsh and not protecting people enough, and the Family laws should allow people to be with whoever they want to be with. Looking at the evidence from the Personal Injury Laws states that punishments towards slaves are

Read More
1627 Words | 7 Pages

The Code of Hammurabi were laws in ancient Mesopotamia, established by King Hammurabi during his reign between 1792-1750 B.C. The Mesopotamians believed the idea of divine kingship, in which kings were chosen by the gods to rule over the nation. Therefore, kings were high and superior in their eyes. Mesopotamians obeyed their rulers and their laws, including the Code of Hammurabi. These laws were considered divine order. The Code of Hammurabi showed the daily life of ancient

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

Hammurabi's code and the modern laws have several similarities and differences. For example, they are both intended to maintain order in society. However, Hammurabi’s code is far more violent than modern law. Also, they have different ways of handling things, different punishments, and different social structure. One way that Hammurabi’s Code and the Modern Laws are different is because Hammurabi’s Code is strictly based on social structure.

Read More
874 Words | 4 Pages

Funk and Wagnall New World Encyclopedia wrote, “The basis of criminal law is that of equal retaliation, comparable to the Semitic law of ‘an eye for an eye’”(“Hammurabi, Code of” 1). Hammurabi was the first to make the law code meaning he was the first to start the foundation for our law system today. He was the father of law and today his justice code is still apparent today. The code of Hammurabi was designed to protect the weak, which includes: women, children and slaves. Funk and Wagnall wrote, “It seeks to protect the weak and the poor, including women, children, and slaves, against injustice at the hands of the rich and powerful”(Hammurabi, Code of” 1).

Read More
495 Words | 2 Pages

Laws are always the core of a society and they often indicate a variety of lifestyle decisions made by those people. Hammurabi’s famous set of laws and Moses’ laws could be viewed as two completely distinct documents, yet both set of laws aide historians in revealing insight to the Hebrew and Mesopotamian people. In both societies, enforcing strict consequences that are equivalent to the crime is common. Hammurabi’s well known law states that, “if a man has put out an eye of a free man, they shall put out his eye.” Whereas, in the Hebrew laws, it states, “...if any harm follows, then you shall give life for life, eye for eye...”

Read More
407 Words | 2 Pages

How do you think Hammurabi’s Laws treated the people of

Read More
544 Words | 3 Pages

Laws in Hammurabi 's Code were divided into groups which addressed the same topic. One group described different types of crimes, in which crimes against property were the most harshly punished. Another was about witchcraft and how witches should be tried, judged, and punished accordingly. Other types included the different methods of appropriate punishment (sometimes harsh), the rules for trading, and laws about marriage, families, borrowing and lending, and about irrigating fields - basically every aspect of

Read More

More about What Is The Law Code Of Hammurabi Dbq

Related Topics

Open Document