ipl-logo

What Was Involved In The Case Of Graham V. Conner

568 Words3 Pages

In the Case of Graham V. Conner, Graham was an extreme diabetic. HE was starting to feel some of the onset of his insulin shot so he called one of his friends named Berry and asked him for a ride to the nearest convenience store. Graham was hoping to just go in and buy some orange juice. He has believed that some of the sugar in the orange juice would help balance his sugar levels. After Graham and his friend Berry had arrived at the convenience store, Graham had gotten out of the car and “hastily” went in. It turns out that the line at the convenience store was very long; Graham “hastily” went back to his car. He then told is friend Berry to drive him to another one of his friend’s house. Officer Conner was waiting outside the convenience …show more content…

Graham was not placed into the car gently. After Graham had regained consciousness, both men sat down with the officers and tried to explain that Graham was having a reaction to his insulin. The officers did not believe Graham and Berry. One officer even commented that he has witnessed many other insulin reactions and that not one of them acted the way that Graham did. In the officer’s opinions, they believed that Graham was just drunk. Officer Connor finally received back the report from the officer who had returned to the store. The report confirmed what Graham and Berry were saying the entire time. However, Graham had suffered cuts on his wrist, a bruised forehead, a broken bone in his foot, an injured shoulder, and persistent ringing in his ears. Graham later sued the police officers that worked his case, but the Fourth Circuit dismissed his case based on little evidence that shows the officers using excessive force. Graham had started petitioning for the Supreme Court to review his case under the “writ of certiorari.” The Supreme Court finally reversed the Fourth Circuit, and took Grahams case to trial. The Supreme Court later remanded Graham’s case back to the lower courts with orders to persecute the officers based on the Fourth Amendment’s “objective reasonableness

Open Document