what was revealed to Paul on the road to Damascus. DaVinci saw the image in the natural, not understanding the spiritual. Yes. Jesus’ marriage is already confirmed in heaven, but is still being processed as He waits for His wife to become His virgin bride.
Why they arrive at their irrelevant consensus:
1. The contention is based on the knowledge of who Christ really is: While it is true that Peter received the first part of the revelation: “Thou art the Christ, Son of the living God.”(Matt.16:16). Paul received the revelation of the mystery of the Christ more fully. Herbert Lockyer in His book “All the Apostles of the Bible” explains it this way: “He (Paul) learned all the suddenness of a surprising and blinding vision what his fellow apostles had learned with dull, reluctant and hesitating receptivity…with a quickness and breath of apprehension, which had not been given to the rest.”
The twelve apostles, who walked with Jesus in the early days of His ministry, knew who He was and were in a position to share their knowledge of Him with Paul who only knew Christ
…show more content…
The contention is, at this time the whole creation is being delivered, meaning that the curse is broken, but in Acts 3:21 Jesus is being held from coming to earth until the times of the restoration of all things. Before Jesus Christ the Lord makes His physical appearance something extraordinary and unparalleled has taken place, to usher in the release of Jesus in the flesh. It has to be a time of the restoration of all things. This looks like the event in Rev.14 where a company redeemed from among men has risen to God and the Lamb for the impartation of supernatural power. This is the only force that will be capable of defeating the enemy and taking the Kingdom other than God and the Lamb. Therefore the idea of the millennium birthing of the man-child cannot