Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Thesis statement regarding the kansas nebraska act
Thesis statement regarding the kansas nebraska act
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Compromise of 1850 was a series of five bills that were intended to delay territorial and slavery conflicts. It passed when fillmore was in presidency and the goal was to deal with slavery and to keep the north’s and south’s interests balanced. The five bills were, California entered as a free state, New Mexico and Utah were each allowed to use popular sovereignty to decide on the issue of slavery, the Republic of Texas gave up lands that it claimed in present day New Mexico and received $10 million to pay its debt to Mexico, the slave trade was abolished in D.C. but not slavery, and the fugitive slave act made any federal official who did not arrest a runaway slave liable to pay a fine. The Fugitive Slave Act was the most Conflicting part of The Compromise of 1850 and caused many abolitionist to increase the beliefs against slavery. According to Watson “This law, which authorized Southerners to recover run-away
The Big Compromises During the mid-1850’s there was this compromise called the Missouri compromise, which was something that led to temporarily ending the slave debate. Then there is the Kansas- Nebraska act. This allowed slavery in the Northern Territories. In the 1800’s there was this thing called the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850.
The Kansas- Nebraska Act allowed divided western land into the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to choose the issue of slavery by popular sovereignty. This increased sectional tensions because the South wanted to build a southern railroad, as it would increase economic growth. Also, the North was upset because of the possibility of the expansion of slavery into western territories. Also, on the day of voting, border ruffians came from Missouri to vote in support of slavery. This greatly upset the North, especially the free-soilers.
One of the very important items of the Compromise of 1850 was the provision for a stronger Fugitive Slave Law. With the Fugitive Slave Law, it made was federal crime to not return a runaway slave to the south. With this law any suspected runaway slave was to be tried by a single judge, but not by a jury. The judge was compensated by a system that would provide them with more money if they decide that the slave was guilty and not innocent. Obviously this law encouraged people not to harbor runaway slaves, but when the slaves were caught it provide the judge an incentive to have them returned to the south.
The book also stated that this led to a stronger slave law (Faragher, 363). The Fugitive Slave Law helped lead toward the civil war as well. This was because the law that was stated increased the power of slave owners to capture the escaped slaves (Faragher, 366). During this time the South was threatening to leave the Union due to
Many of the political events lead us into battles, like the Kansas-Nebraska Act during 1854. Senator Stephen Douglass, had thought that popular sovereignty seemed liked an excellent way to decide whether slavery would be allowed in Nebraska Territory. Douglas introduced a bill in congress on January 23, 1854 that would divide the area into two territories. Nebraska is in the north and Kansas is in the south, since the Kansas and Nebraska territory lay north of the Missouri Compromise line of 36°30’ and thereof it was legally closed to slavery. Kansas and Nebraska Act became a law in 1854.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed each territory to decide the issue of slavery on the basis of popular sovereignty. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri Compromise, which had kept the Union from falling apart for the last thirty-four years. The Kansas-Nebraska let to Bleeding Kansas. Monroe Doctrine 1823 which created separate spheres of European and American influence.
Douglas also being a believer in popular sovereignty started arguing that residents rather than congress should decide the status of slavery in a territory. In order to fulfil his wishes he created the Kansas Nebraska act 1954, the act divided the large chuck of incorporated land into Nebraska and
The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was a very controversial law that caused much resistance. The Fugitive Slave Act’s main purpose was to return escaped slaves to their owners, and additionally, they would penalize anyone who would help shelter the runaway slaves. There was tension between states; those who opposed slavery tried to provide a safe haven, while those who supported slavery agreed and supported the Fugitive Slave Act. This led to revolts and, therefore, sparked the beginning of the Civil War. The Fugitive Slave Act was a significant event that led to the Civil War because of the tensions rising in the states.
In 1854, Stephen Douglas introduced the Kansas-Nebraska Act to Congress in order to amend the issue of slavery among the states. He proposed that the territory of Nebraska be split into two separate states, the other becoming the state of Kansas. Nebraska would become a free state and Kansas would become a slave state. However, this caused tension with the North because they noted that this bill repealed the Missouri Compromise, allowing slavery into land above the thirty six thirty parallel. As the state continued to grow in population, the state began to resemble a miniature United States.
The government prohibited the slave trade in the District of Columbia. The Fugitive Slave Act was also a part of the Compromise of 1850. The Fugitive Slave Act required northerners to return runaway slaves to their owners in the South. The act extremely angered the North because they were required to take part in slavery. The South did not like the addition of California as a free state.
It prevented further territorial expansion of slavery while reinforcing the Fugitive Slave Act, which required people in the North to apprehend and return escaped slaves. While avoiding outright hostilities, the Compromise of 1850 only strengthened the underlying division of the nation, and brought the issue of slavery closer to home to the Northerners as they were forced to directly participate through Fugitive Slave Act. In 1852 a woman named Harriet Beecher Stowe published a fictional and highly romanticized work about the life of a slave called Uncle Tom’s Cabin. It became one of the top selling books in the U.S., second only to the Bible.
Due to the fact that the South had more of an agricultural economy, the Southerners thought that the states should have the right to decide whether residents could own slaves, rather than the federal government. In 1846 a congressman from Pennsylvania named David Wilmot introduced a bill to the House of Representatives called the Wilmot Proviso. This said slavery would not be allowed in any western territory acquired from Mexico. Of course most of the politicians from the North loved the idea, while the politicians from the South did not. The Missouri Compromise on March 3, 1820 (also called the Compromise of 1820) was the first major legislative compromise that was passed to draw a line between slave and free territory.
In addition, the South were afraid that the balance of power between the free and slave states would now shift toward free. To make matters worse, there was now discourse between the people in the North about the Fugitive Slave act, some believed, such as Daniel Webster in Document H, that “South is right and the North is wrong…” while others were strongly against it. The Kansas and Nebraska ask wanted to give more power to the people and allow them to decide on the implementation of slavery in their own states. However, in an attempt to affect the vote, abolitionists and pro-slavery people came to Kansas. This led to fighting and killing and the name “Bloody Kansas”.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was a very critical issue that helped divide the nation. At the center of this act was slavery. Under the Kansas and Nebraska Act, slavery was decided based on popular sovereignty. Northerners felt like this undermined the Missouri Compromise, further creating