ipl-logo

Civil War Dbq Essay

726 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Causes of the civil war essay free

The civil war was one of the most intense and destructive wars the U.S have ever experienced, the war left over 640,000 soldiers dead, 476,000 wounded and 400,000 missing, this resulting in about 2% of the population dead. Whilst the war brought violence and destruction it also resolved two important questions that were unable to be resolved by the revolution these include; weather the United States was going to be made up of many independent states or a united nation with an independent government, and weather the United States was going to remain as the largest slaveholding country. Before the war the division between the north and south was a rising problem, which reached its peak at the outbreak war, the division was based around the different …show more content…

Such collapse was due to the Kansas Nebraska act 1854 which was introduced by a democratic senator from Illinoi named Stephan A Douglas. The act was brought about due to The Missouri compromise 1820, the compromise was made to balance the number of free states and slave states, it allowed slavery in Missouri but made it off limits in the remaining federally administered Louisiana territory. In source 1.0 it shows how the states were divided, the green states are the free states, which were closed to slavery, and the orange states are the slave states, which were open to slavery. The Missouri compromise was considered inconvenient for Douglas, as an advocate of western expansion he wanted to build a transcontinental railroad. Going against the Missouri compromise he believed for the railroad to work, the territories in which the railroad passed through would have to be formally organised. Douglas also being a believer in popular sovereignty started arguing that residents rather than congress should decide the status of slavery in a territory. In order to fulfil his wishes he created the Kansas Nebraska act 1954, the act divided the large chuck of incorporated land into Nebraska and …show more content…

Northerners recognised the bill as the repeal of the 34 year old Missouri compromises and feared that the bills true intentions was to extend slavery to the entire nation. Congress was able to pass the Kansas Nebraska act but resulted in a severe division between the nation with 91% of the opposition coming from northerners, not only did it make the division bigger between the north and south but also caused the house of representatives to fight due to their different view points. Soon enough the issues revolving around the act and slavery divided the Whigs and democrats, with congressman from both parties acting for and against the act. An Illinoi Whig named Abraham Lincoln spoke out about how monstrous slavey was in an 1854 speech. By this time the Whigs ceased to exist due to them being split between their northern and southern factions. Soon after the republicans party was founded from the anti-slavery element from both the Whigs and democrats. The majority of the party was made up of northern Whigs and democrats; Abraham Lincoln was a key figure in the support of the republicans helping them find new members. The Kansas Nebraska act participated greatly in the lead up to war as it created disputes between parties as well as the ending of the Whigs, before the act Whigs and democrats united around various issues to come up with and outcome but the act forced the

Show More
Related
602 Words | 3 Pages

President Abraham Lincoln battled the Kansas- Nebraska Act. Many looked at slavery as cruel, sad, and unfair which was one of the reasons why people thought of the idea to get it abolished. People who hold a high political power up north was scared that the extension of slavery moving toward the west that the states would give the states down south influence in such areas. When Abraham Lincoln was elected to be the president of the United States the other eleven states came from the Union. Lincoln thought this was very unacceptable and he decided to declare war to preserve the

Read More
269 Words | 2 Pages

With the pressure following the passage of the Kansas Nebraska Act, many northerners opposed slavery and were concerned with the possibility of its expansion. In 1856, these northerners formed a new political party called the Republican Party. Once Abraham Lincoln was nominated as the Republican candidate, the South began making plans to secede from the union if Lincoln was elected as President of the United States. In the “South Carolina Declaration of Causes of Secession”, delegates state, “A geographical line has been drawn across the Union, and all the States north of that line have united in the election of a man to the high office of President of the United States, whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery. ”15

Read More
764 Words | 4 Pages

The Kansas-Nebraska Act would violate the Missouri Compromise, which had been keeping the union from falling apart for 34 years. Almost all of the Southern Whigs voted for the bill and all of the Northern Whigs opposed it. This caused there to be conflict and no agreement could be found, thus causing the Southern Whigs to be known as Democrats and the Northern Whigs to stay Whigs. It had split up the Whigs and Democrats to form a new party; the Republicans. They were anti-slavery.

Read More
446 Words | 2 Pages

This conflict between northern and southern Whig’s led to the end of the party. Additionally it disrupted the Democratic Party. The Democrats that opposed the act joined Free-Soilers and abolitionists to form what is now known as the Republican Party (Henretta, Edwards, & Self, 2012). This was key as Douglas faced off against Abraham Lincoln twice in elections. Once for the Senate, which he won and the other, the 1860 presidential election.

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

Prior to the Civil War, multiple compromises were made to try to keep civility. The problems that led to the Civil War and increased sectionalism were the Missouri Compromise, The Kansas-Nebraska Act, The Compromise of 1850, and The Caning of Senator Sumner. These compromises and acts had problems with them because they had too many flaws. Before the Missouri Compromise was written in 1820, complications began to rise between the North and South.

Read More
540 Words | 3 Pages

Southern slave owners were pleased with this, but northern abolitionists were greatly opposed to such actions. This fueling of tensions solidified the positions of pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions to the point that future attempts at compromise would be ineffective. As northern abolitionists gained support for their cause, the South began to fear northern dominance and aggression. Setting the stage to make things worse, the Compromise of 1850 influenced and led to events such as the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the Dredd Scott decision. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 allowed new territories to determine whether or not they would allow slavery via popular sovereignty.

Read More
881 Words | 4 Pages

Since the Kansas-Nebraska act let the Kansas and Nebraska territories vote for whether the were going to become a slave state or not, it really started the breakup of the Democratic Party. There were already some democrats who liked slavery and there were also some that would rather not have it. These people with different thoughts were starting to break apart already but the Kansas-Nebraska really drew the line. When the Act was passed the anti-slavery democrats were furious and split into the Republican Party. They were mad because it repealed the Missouri Compromise which was outlawing slavery above the 36*30’ line.

Read More
2217 Words | 9 Pages

The issue of popular sovereignty, rights of self-government, moral justification of slavery and economic freedom led to the emergence of Abraham Lincoln as an outspoken leader in the Republican Party. He began to be a larger voice to the spread of slavery in the West and other new territories. His skeptical belief in the Democrat’s justification of the spread of slavery led to his renewed interest in national

Read More
1266 Words | 6 Pages

The men doing so were Franklin Pierce, Senator Stephen A. Douglass, James Buchanan, and senator Lewis Cass, they were the main contributors to the problems in the Union. Created in 1856 Straightforward image An outbreak of conflict had emerged resulting from the passage of the Kansas Nebraska Act under the principle of popular sovereignty but the main issue of the doctrine was the faith of the outcome. In Kansas free-soilers prompted to control the government. John Brown a more violent abolitionist fought a war with pro-slavery forces.

Read More
803 Words | 4 Pages

Before the American Civil War, we struggled with the concept of slavery based on our economic and moral differences. People who lived in the North believed that slavery should be abolished since they did not grow crops that needed an abundance of slaves. Moreover, they thought that slaves should be treated like all human beings based on the constitution. On the other side, Americans who lived in the South thought slavery should not be abolished as their crops demanded twice as much work than the ones in the North; therefore, they needed much more workers working in their field and that’s where slaves came into view. They also thought that Africans were inferior because of their skin color and origin.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

In this election, Lincoln and Douglas had some series of debates over slavery. Although Lincoln never exactly stated that he wanted to abolish slavery, much of the South believed he was an Abolitionist. At his speech in 1858 in Springfield Illinois, Lincoln wanted the nation to be one thing or another, meaning all free or all slave, because it couldn’t keep going on how it was, else it would fall apart. In his speech, Lincoln said, “...but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other” (Doc G).

Read More
1069 Words | 5 Pages

Implemented in 1854, this revoked the Missouri Compromise of 1820 which forbade slavery in the North. Even though Kansas would not be considered as a Northern state, it became a place of bloodshed as pro- and anti-slavery aspects expanded into the territory, strengthening the rising tension that was already present between the two parties. Pieter Geyl confirms that the North and South were ‘divided by a moral issue of the first magnitude,’ with one party ‘detesting slavery and, the other glorifying it as the basis of its social system.’ ‘Bleeding Kansas’ was an important component in understanding that the different ideologies of slavery between the people of Kansas at this time, resulted in their inability to compensate personal values for communal peace. As this act was aimed to save the North, to unify rather than divide, the Kansas-Nebraska Act resulted in the opposing contention. Reporter William Russell from the London Times had additionally claimed that the ‘tone’ and ‘speech’ of Southerners when alluding to people from the North were said in spite and hostility.

Read More
868 Words | 4 Pages

Instead, the Act allowed the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide the issue of slavery through popular sovereignty. This decision backfired, sparking violence and bloodshed in Kansas in a period known as "Bleeding Kansas," as pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers clashed for control. The Kansas-Nebraska Act intensified the increasing divide and shattered the peace established by previous compromises. It also led to the formation of the Republican Party, which opposed the expansion of slavery and attracted a wide union of anti-slavery Northerners. In 1860, Abraham Lincoln was elected president, which became the final catalyst for Southern secession.

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

The two out four questions that I choose are to 1.) Discuss the causes of the civil war. Cite as many facts as possible to back up your analysis. And answer 2.) If the enduring vision of America is embodied in the Declaration of Independence's statements about equality and universal rights to justice, liberty, and self-fulfillment, how much progress toward those ideals had blacks and women made by 1877?

Read More
1299 Words | 6 Pages

During the mid-nineteenth century, the controversy over the morality of slavery and the rights of African Americans overshadowed America’s efforts of building a united nation. In fact, this controversy tore America apart. Abraham Lincoln was not only one of the leading anti-slavery advocates, but he also eventually became president during this tumultuous era. Many events occurred prior to the start of the Civil War that shaped Lincoln’s thinking and his approach to abolishing slavery. These events include the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, the Dred Scott decision of 1857, and Lincoln’s senate race against Stephen A. Douglas.

Read More

More about Civil War Dbq Essay

Related Topics

Open Document